Oleg Zaslavsky1, Rod L Walker2, Paul K Crane3, Shelly L Gray4, Eric B Larson3. 1. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle. ozasl@uw.edu. 2. Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Washington, Seattle. 3. Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Washington, Seattle. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. 4. School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between glucose levels and incident frailty in older persons remains unclear. We examined the extent to which higher glucose levels in older adults with and without diabetes are related to risk of frailty. METHODS: The data are from the Adult Changes in Thought study. We identified 1,848 individuals aged 65+ without dementia for whom glucose levels from laboratory measurements of glucose and glycated hemoglobin were available. Physical frailty using modified Fried's criteria was determined from biennial assessments. Frailty hazard was modeled as a function of time-varying measures of diabetes and average glucose levels using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 578 incident frailty cases (94 with diabetes, 484 without) occurred during a median follow-up of 4.8 years. The adjusted hazard ratio for frailty comparing those with and without diabetes was 1.52 (95% confidence interval = 1.19-1.94). In participants without diabetes, modeling suggested elevated frailty risk with greater average glucose levels (p = .019); for example, a glucose level of 110mg/dL compared with 100mg/dL yielded a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% confidence interval = 1.09-1.59). In participants with diabetes, glucose levels less than 160mg/dL and greater than 180mg/dL were related to increased risk of frailty (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Higher glucose levels may be a risk factor for frailty in older adults without diabetes. The apparent U-shape association between glucose levels and frailty in people with diabetes is consistent with the literature on glycemia and mortality and deserves further examination.
BACKGROUND: The association between glucose levels and incident frailty in older persons remains unclear. We examined the extent to which higher glucose levels in older adults with and without diabetes are related to risk of frailty. METHODS: The data are from the Adult Changes in Thought study. We identified 1,848 individuals aged 65+ without dementia for whom glucose levels from laboratory measurements of glucose and glycated hemoglobin were available. Physical frailty using modified Fried's criteria was determined from biennial assessments. Frailty hazard was modeled as a function of time-varying measures of diabetes and average glucose levels using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 578 incident frailty cases (94 with diabetes, 484 without) occurred during a median follow-up of 4.8 years. The adjusted hazard ratio for frailty comparing those with and without diabetes was 1.52 (95% confidence interval = 1.19-1.94). In participants without diabetes, modeling suggested elevated frailty risk with greater average glucose levels (p = .019); for example, a glucose level of 110mg/dL compared with 100mg/dL yielded a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% confidence interval = 1.09-1.59). In participants with diabetes, glucose levels less than 160mg/dL and greater than 180mg/dL were related to increased risk of frailty (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Higher glucose levels may be a risk factor for frailty in older adults without diabetes. The apparent U-shape association between glucose levels and frailty in people with diabetes is consistent with the literature on glycemia and mortality and deserves further examination.
Authors: Jeremy Walston; Evan C Hadley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski; William B Ershler; Tamara Harris; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Michael W Steffes; Hong Zhu; Kunihiro Matsushita; Lynne Wagenknecht; James Pankow; Josef Coresh; Frederick L Brancati Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rita R Kalyani; Jing Tian; Qian-Li Xue; Jeremy Walston; Anne R Cappola; Linda P Fried; Frederick L Brancati; Caroline S Blaum Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Paul K Crane; Rod Walker; Rebecca A Hubbard; Ge Li; David M Nathan; Hui Zheng; Sebastien Haneuse; Suzanne Craft; Thomas J Montine; Steven E Kahn; Wayne McCormick; Susan M McCurry; James D Bowen; Eric B Larson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sari Stenholm; Timo E Strandberg; Kaisu Pitkälä; Päivi Sainio; Markku Heliövaara; Seppo Koskinen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; Yuan Lu; Gitanjali M Singh; Melanie J Cowan; Christopher J Paciorek; John K Lin; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Gretchen A Stevens; Mayuree Rao; Mohammed K Ali; Leanne M Riley; Carolyn A Robinson; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Oleg Zaslavsky; Onchee Yu; Rod L Walker; Paul K Crane; Shelly L Gray; Tatiana Sadak; Soo Borson; Eric B Larson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Helen P Hazuda; Qing Pan; Hermes Florez; José A Luchsinger; Jill P Crandall; Elizabeth M Venditti; Sherita H Golden; Andrea M Kriska; George A Bray Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 6.053