Literature DB >> 26933124

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies Frequent Drug-Sensitive EGFR Exon 19 Deletions in NSCLC not Identified by Prior Molecular Testing.

Alexa B Schrock1, Garrett M Frampton1, Dana Herndon2, Joel R Greenbowe1, Kai Wang1, Doron Lipson1, Roman Yelensky1, Zachary R Chalmers1, Juliann Chmielecki1, Julia A Elvin1, Mira Wollner3, Addie Dvir4, Lior Soussan -Gutman4, Rodolfo Bordoni5, Nir Peled6, Fadi Braiteh7, Luis Raez8, Rachel Erlich1, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou9, Mohamed Mohamed2, Jeffrey S Ross10, Philip J Stephens1, Siraj M Ali11, Vincent A Miller11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reliable detection of drug-sensitive activating EGFR mutations is critical in the care of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but such testing is commonly performed using a wide variety of platforms, many of which lack rigorous analytic validation. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A large pool of NSCLC cases was assayed with well-validated, hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians in the course of clinical care for the purpose of making therapy decisions. From these, 400 cases harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions (Δex19) were identified, and available clinical history was reviewed.
RESULTS: Pathology reports were available for 250 consecutive cases with classical EGFR Δex19 (amino acids 743-754) and were reviewed to assess previous non-hybrid capture-based EGFR testing. Twelve of 71 (17%) cases with EGFR testing results available were negative by previous testing, including 8 of 46 (17%) cases for which the same biopsy was analyzed. Independently, five of six (83%) cases harboring C-helical EGFR Δex19 were previously negative. In a subset of these patients with available clinical outcome information, robust benefit from treatment with EGFR inhibitors was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: CGP identifies drug-sensitive EGFR Δex19 in NSCLC cases that have undergone prior EGFR testing and returned negative results. Given the proven benefit in progression-free survival conferred by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with these alterations, CGP should be considered in the initial presentation of advanced NSCLC and when previous testing for EGFR mutations or other driver alterations is negative. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3281-5. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26933124     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

1.  Liquid biopsy in the practice of neo-oncology.

Authors:  Smadar Geva; Laila C Roisman; Nir Peled
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Facilitates Implementation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing and Identifies Patients Who May Benefit From Enrollment in Mechanism-Driven Clinical Trials.

Authors:  James H Suh; Adrienne Johnson; Lee Albacker; Kai Wang; Juliann Chmielecki; Garrett Frampton; Laurie Gay; Julia A Elvin; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Siraj Ali; Vincent A Miller; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  Hybrid Capture-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies Lung Cancer Patients with Well-Characterized Sensitizing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Point Mutations That Were Not Detected by Standard of Care Testing.

Authors:  James H Suh; Alexa B Schrock; Adrienne Johnson; Doron Lipson; Laurie M Gay; Shakti Ramkissoon; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Julia A Elvin; Abdur Shakir; Peter Ruehlman; Karen L Reckamp; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Siraj M Ali
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-03-14

4.  Hybrid Capture-Based Genomic Profiling Identifies BRAF V600 and Non-V600 Alterations in Melanoma Samples Negative by Prior Testing.

Authors:  Lise Boussemart; Annie Nelson; Michael Wong; Jeffrey S Ross; Jeffrey Sosman; Janice Mehnert; Gregory Daniels; Kari Kendra; Siraj Mahamed Ali; Vincent A Miller; Alexa B Schrock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 5.  Profile of rociletinib and its potential in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Phu N Tran; Samuel J Klempner
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-05-18

6.  Cryptotanshinone Suppresses Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer via microRNA-146a-5p/EGFR Axis.

Authors:  Pengfei Qi; Yanli Li; Xiaomin Liu; Fatemeh A Jafari; Xinju Zhang; Qiangling Sun; Zhongliang Ma
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Molecular Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of EGFR Exon 19 C-Helix Deletion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Response to EGFR TKIs.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Xu; Lei Lei; Wen-Xian Wang; Li Lin; You-Cai Zhu; Hong Wang; Li-Yun Miao; Li-Ping Wang; Wu Zhuang; Mei-Yu Fang; Tang-Feng Lv; Yong Song
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Mutation and drug-specific intracellular accumulation of EGFR predict clinical responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Maurice de Wit; Ya Gao; Darlene Mercieca; Iris de Heer; Bart Valkenburg; Martin E van Royen; Joachim Aerts; Peter Sillevis Smitt; Pim French
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Structural variation and its potential impact on genome instability: Novel discoveries in the EGFR landscape by long-read sequencing.

Authors:  George W Cook; Michael G Benton; Wallace Akerley; George F Mayhew; Cynthia Moehlenkamp; Denise Raterman; Daniel L Burgess; William J Rowell; Christine Lambert; Kevin Eng; Jenny Gu; Primo Baybayan; John T Fussell; Heath D Herbold; John M O'Shea; Thomas K Varghese; Lyska L Emerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [Chinese Expert Consensus on Next Generation Sequencing Diagnosis 
for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (2020 Edition)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2020-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.