Tera L Fazzino1, Nora J Sporn2,3, Christie A Befort2,3. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. tfazzino@kumc.edu. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Obesity is prevalent in breast cancer survivors and is a significant risk factor for recurrence and mortality. Weight management interventions for survivors have been diverse in design (in-person vs. phone-based, group vs. individual) and yielded varying weight loss results. Given these issues, participants themselves may provide insight into treatment-based factors that contributed to their weight loss outcomes. Here, we report qualitative results from interviews with survivors in a group phone-based weight loss intervention, with the objective of identifying mechanisms that facilitated or hindered adherence and weight loss. We explored interest in paying for continued treatment as an indicator of dissemination potential. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with 186 rural, obese breast cancer survivors upon completion of a 6-month weight loss intervention that produced clinically meaningful weight loss (>5 %) in 91 % of participants. A thematic analysis of the interview data was performed. RESULTS: Five themes were identified as impacting adherence and success: (1) accountability; (2) importance of the group, with varying levels of connectedness; (3) dietary convenience; (4) difficulty maintaining intervention components that required more effort; and (5) importance of internal motivation to attributions of physical activity success or failure. Most were interested in paying to continue the program if it were extended beyond the study. CONCLUSIONS: Key intervention components that participants attributed to their success included supportive group processes and convenience. Results highlight the group phone-based approach as a potential venue for disseminating an effective weight loss program for breast cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01441011.
PURPOSE:Obesity is prevalent in breast cancer survivors and is a significant risk factor for recurrence and mortality. Weight management interventions for survivors have been diverse in design (in-person vs. phone-based, group vs. individual) and yielded varying weight loss results. Given these issues, participants themselves may provide insight into treatment-based factors that contributed to their weight loss outcomes. Here, we report qualitative results from interviews with survivors in a group phone-based weight loss intervention, with the objective of identifying mechanisms that facilitated or hindered adherence and weight loss. We explored interest in paying for continued treatment as an indicator of dissemination potential. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with 186 rural, obese breast cancer survivors upon completion of a 6-month weight loss intervention that produced clinically meaningful weight loss (>5 %) in 91 % of participants. A thematic analysis of the interview data was performed. RESULTS: Five themes were identified as impacting adherence and success: (1) accountability; (2) importance of the group, with varying levels of connectedness; (3) dietary convenience; (4) difficulty maintaining intervention components that required more effort; and (5) importance of internal motivation to attributions of physical activity success or failure. Most were interested in paying to continue the program if it were extended beyond the study. CONCLUSIONS: Key intervention components that participants attributed to their success included supportive group processes and convenience. Results highlight the group phone-based approach as a potential venue for disseminating an effective weight loss program for breast cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01441011.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Cancer survivorship; Qualitative evaluation; Weight loss
Authors: Lisa M Nackers; Pamela J Dubyak; Xiaomin Lu; Stephen D Anton; Gareth R Dutton; Michael G Perri Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Christie A Befort; Jennifer R Klemp; Heather L Austin; Michael G Perri; Kathryn H Schmitz; Debra K Sullivan; Carol J Fabian Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-12-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Zora Djuric; Josephine Mirasolo; LaVern Kimbrough; Diane R Brown; Lance K Heilbrun; Lisa Canar; Raghu Venkatranamamoorthy; Michael S Simon Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth C Clipp; Isaac M Lipkus; David Lobach; Denise Clutter Snyder; Richard Sloane; Bercedis Peterson; Jennifer M Macri; Cheryl L Rock; Colleen M McBride; William E Kraus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah J Hardcastle; Maddison Galliott; Brigid M Lynch; Nga H Nguyen; Paul A Cohen; Ganendra Raj Mohan; Niloufer J Johansen; Christobel Saunders Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2019-10
Authors: Caroline O Terranova; Sheleigh P Lawler; Kym Spathonis; Elizabeth G Eakin; Marina M Reeves Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Chloé Maxwell-Smith; Paul A Cohen; Cameron Platell; Jason Tan; Christobel Saunders; Sophie Nightingale; Craig Lynch; Frank Sardelic; Jacob McCormick; Sarah J Hardcastle Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ashlea Braun; James Portner; Elizabeth M Grainger; Emily B Hill; Gregory S Young; Steven K Clinton; Colleen K Spees Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano; Jennifer R Bail; Pamela J Goodwin; Cynthia A Thomson; Don W Bradley; Kerry S Courneya; Christie A Befort; Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; William H Dietz; Melinda R Stolley; Melinda L Irwin; Marcas M Bamman; Caroline M Apovian; Bernardine M Pinto; Kathleen Y Wolin; Rachel M Ballard; Andrew J Dannenberg; Elizabeth G Eakin; Matt M Longjohn; Susan D Raffa; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Joanne S Buzaglo; Sharyl J Nass; Greta M Massetti; Erin P Balogh; Elizabeth S Kraft; Anand K Parekh; Darshak M Sanghavi; G Stephen Morris; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 508.702