Literature DB >> 26932550

Tips and tricks to avoid bile duct injury in SILC: an experience of 500 cases.

Tony Li1, Guowei Kim2, Stephen Chang3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstones. Surgeons have attempted to minimize the number of incisions via single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), which offers benefits including improved cosmesis, possibly less postoperative pain, and improved patient satisfaction. However, studies show that there is an increased risk of operative complications-in particular bile duct injuries. We report 500 consecutive cases of SILC performed without bile duct injury.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 500 continuous cases of SILC performed by the same surgeon at a single institution was conducted. Data on patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. Detailed analysis of surgical techniques specifically to reduce bile duct injury was performed and described in this study.
RESULTS: In total, 500 patients underwent SILC during the study period. Eight patients needed additional ports to complete the surgery, while one was converted to an open surgery. No serious intraoperative complications, such as bile duct injury, were encountered.
CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that with due care and caution during SILC, with particular attention towards achieving the critical view of safety and a standardized technique, bile duct injury in SILC can be avoided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26932550     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4802-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Early experience in single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stephen Kin Yong Chang; Shaun Shi Yan Tan; Yee Onn Kok
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 2.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Nikhil Ladwa; Lorain Kalra; Kristian K Hutson; Krishna K Singh; Mazin Sayegh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Tips for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Noriaki Kameyama; Ryohei Miyata; Masato Tomita; Hiroaki Mitsuhashi; Shigeaki Baba; Shunichi Imai
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante; Ivo Giovannini; Francesco Ardito; Fabrizio D'Acapito; Maria Vellone; Marino Murazio; Giovanni Capelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-10

9.  Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Derek E Moore; Irene D Feurer; Michael D Holzman; Leonard J Wudel; Carolyn Strickland; D Lee Gorden; Ravi Chari; J Kelly Wright; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05

10.  Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  J C Russell; S J Walsh; A S Mattie; J T Lynch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Advantages of the glove port docking technique in robotic single-site cholecystectomy: comparison with the conventional silicone port.

Authors:  Ji Wool Ko; Jin Woo Lee; Sung Won Kwon; Sung Hoon Choi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-21

2.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases.

Authors:  Ye-Ji Lee; Ju Ik Moon; In-Seok Choi; Sang-Eok Lee; Nak-Song Sung; Seong-Wook Kwon; Dae-Sung Yoon; Won-Jun Choi; Si-Min Park
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  Enabling single-site laparoscopy: the SPORT platform.

Authors:  Barbara Seeliger; Michele Diana; Jelle P Ruurda; Konstantinos M Konstantinidis; Jacques Marescaux; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Klein; Atakan Görkem Barutcu; Dino Kröll; Maik Kilian; Johann Pratschke; Roland Raakow; Jonas Raakow
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.445

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.