Literature DB >> 26931813

Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing.

Guangting Mai1, James W Minett2, William S-Y Wang3.   

Abstract

A growing number of studies indicate that multiple ranges of brain oscillations, especially the delta (δ, <4Hz), theta (θ, 4-8Hz), beta (β, 13-30Hz), and gamma (γ, 30-50Hz) bands, are engaged in speech and language processing. It is not clear, however, how these oscillations relate to functional processing at different linguistic hierarchical levels. Using scalp electroencephalography (EEG), the current study tested the hypothesis that phonological and the higher-level linguistic (semantic/syntactic) organizations during auditory sentence processing are indexed by distinct EEG signatures derived from the δ, θ, β, and γ oscillations. We analyzed specific EEG signatures while subjects listened to Mandarin speech stimuli in three different conditions in order to dissociate phonological and semantic/syntactic processing: (1) sentences comprising valid disyllabic words assembled in a valid syntactic structure (real-word condition); (2) utterances with morphologically valid syllables, but not constituting valid disyllabic words (pseudo-word condition); and (3) backward versions of the real-word and pseudo-word conditions. We tested four signatures: band power, EEG-acoustic entrainment (EAE), cross-frequency coupling (CFC), and inter-electrode renormalized partial directed coherence (rPDC). The results show significant effects of band power and EAE of δ and θ oscillations for phonological, rather than semantic/syntactic processing, indicating the importance of tracking δ- and θ-rate phonetic patterns during phonological analysis. We also found significant β-related effects, suggesting tracking of EEG to the acoustic stimulus (high-β EAE), memory processing (θ-low-β CFC), and auditory-motor interactions (20-Hz rPDC) during phonological analysis. For semantic/syntactic processing, we obtained a significant effect of γ power, suggesting lexical memory retrieval or processing grammatical word categories. Based on these findings, we confirm that scalp EEG signatures relevant to δ, θ, β, and γ oscillations can index phonological and semantic/syntactic organizations separately in auditory sentence processing, compatible with the view that phonological and higher-level linguistic processing engage distinct neural networks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory sentence; Brain oscillations; EEG; Phonological processing; Semantic processing; Syntactic processing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26931813     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Scale-Free Amplitude Modulation of Neuronal Oscillations Tracks Comprehension of Accelerated Speech.

Authors:  Ana Filipa Teixeira Borges; Anne-Lise Giraud; Huibert D Mansvelder; Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Chronic ambulatory electrocorticography from human speech cortex.

Authors:  Vikram R Rao; Matthew K Leonard; Jonathan K Kleen; Ben A Lucas; Emily A Mirro; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The relationship between entrainment dynamics and reading fluency assessed by sensorimotor perturbation.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Roeland Hancock; Jennifer Mozeiko; Edward W Large
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Left Motor δ Oscillations Reflect Asynchrony Detection in Multisensory Speech Perception.

Authors:  Emmanuel Biau; Benjamin G Schultz; Thomas C Gunter; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Bridging the Gap between Genes and Language Deficits in Schizophrenia: An Oscillopathic Approach.

Authors:  Elliot Murphy; Antonio Benítez-Burraco
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation and Incremental Sentence Comprehension: Computational Dependencies during Language Learning as Revealed by Neuronal Oscillations.

Authors:  Zachariah R Cross; Mark J Kohler; Matthias Schlesewsky; M G Gaskell; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Lower Beta: A Central Coordinator of Temporal Prediction in Multimodal Speech.

Authors:  Emmanuel Biau; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Early Interactive Acoustic Experience with Non-speech Generalizes to Speech and Confers a Syllabic Processing Advantage at 9 Months.

Authors:  Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla; Teresa Realpe-Bonilla; April A Benasich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Human EEG and Recurrent Neural Networks Exhibit Common Temporal Dynamics During Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Saeedeh Hashemnia; Lukas Grasse; Shweta Soni; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.