Literature DB >> 26931478

Adverse obstetric symptoms and rural-urban difference in cesarean delivery in Rupandehi district, Western Nepal: a cohort study.

Vishnu Khanal1, Rajendra Karkee2, Andy H Lee3, Colin W Binns4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The burden of maternal morbidity is high in developing countries including Nepal. This study investigated obstetric complications and rural-urban difference in cesarean delivery rate in Western Nepal.
METHODS: A community-based cohort study was conducted in the Rupandehi district of Western Nepal during January-October, 2014, by interviewing 735 mothers within one month postpartum. The prevalence of obstetric complications was reported via frequency distribution, while factors associated with cesarean delivery were assessed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The prevalence of adverse obstetric symptoms during antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods were 19.7%, 27.8% and 21.6%, respectively. In total, 81 (11.0%) mothers reported having stillbirths. The cesarean delivery rate was 14.1% overall but was four times higher in the urban (23.0%) than in the rural areas (5.8%). Prolonged labor (19.0%) and heavy bleeding (16.7%) were common among rural women. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that cesarean section was more likely for mothers residing in urban areas than in rural areas (adjusted odds ratio 3.41; 95 % confidence interval 2.01 to 5.78).
CONCLUSIONS: About one in five mothers reported some adverse obstetric symptoms. Obstetric problems were more common in the rural areas, whereas cesarean delivery rate was much higher in the urban areas. Further investigations are required to determine whether these cesarean sections are medically warranted or provider induced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26931478      PMCID: PMC4774033          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


Background

Worldwide, maternal mortality has fallen substantially at an annual rate of 1.3 % since 1990 [1]. In developing countries, the maternal mortality ratio was 283.2 per 100,000 live births in 1990 and decreased to 209.1 in 2013 [1]. Despite such progress, about 15 % of women suffer obstetric complications every year [2], while the burden of maternal morbidity remains high in developing countries, the consequences of which include infertility, psychological effects, disability, and loss of quality of life [3]. Nepal has achieved great success in reducing maternal mortality since 1990, notwithstanding severe political unrest, unstable economy and poor health infrastructure [4]. The maternal mortality ratio was 850 per 100,000 live births in 1990, reduced to 281 in 2005, and 170 by 2013 [5]. However, a recent survey in 2009 reported that 41 % of maternal deaths occurred in health facilities and 40 % at the home, suggesting that early notification and response to danger signs in these settings are essential to save the lives of Nepalese mothers [6]. With increasing health facility deliveries, the cesarean section rates in Nepal are also rising. There is some concern that the increase could be due to more planned or provider initiated operations rather than medically indicated [7]. In resource poor settings such as Nepal, provider-induced cesarean sections are likely to exert additional pressure on the already stretched health system. Therefore, monitoring of the cesarean delivery rate is important to ensure health equity particularly for disadvantaged populations and vulnerable groups, and that maternity services are being provided thoughtfully. It has been reported that 40 % of women experienced a serious illness during pregnancy and childbirth [8], while 21.1 %, 24.4 %, and 10.2 % of mothers had suffered from obstetric problems related to childbirth during the antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods, respectively [7]. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of obstetric complications and to investigate the rural–urban difference in cesarean delivery in Western Nepal. In view of the recent major earthquake which has destroyed infrastructure and many health facilities across the country [9, 10], our results are particularly timely and important to arouse worldwide attention to the problem.

Methods

Study setting

The Rupandehi district lies in south-western Nepal, with relatively good access to hospitals and other health facilities in the region. The district has three referral hospitals and one district hospital in urban areas, and five primary health care centers, six health posts and 58 sub-health posts in rural areas, providing services to its population of 880,196 (432,193 males, 448,003 females) [11, 12]. According to the 2009 Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Survey, the Rupandehi district has a higher maternal mortality (274 per 100,000 live births) than the national average (229 per 100,000 live births) [6]. The district is predominantly ‘rural’ consisting of village development committees, whereas ‘urban’ is defined as municipalities. While each village development committee has at least one government facility, health posts and sub-health posts do not have doctors and nurses stationed to provide full maternity services. Similarly, primary health care centers are not equipped to perform cesarean sections, unlike urban hospitals. Most rural areas are linked to the cities by gravel roads. Public transport is often irregular and non-functional during the rainy season due to road blockades, and therefore cannot be relied upon for medical emergencies. When public transport runs smoothly, it takes one-day travel to reach the nearby city from some of the rural areas for referral services.

Participants and procedure

A cohort study was conducted in the Rupandehi district during January-October, 2014. Fig. 1 explains the process of recruitment of participants [13]. Briefly, the total population of expected infants (<1 year) was 20,061 in 2014 [Source: District Public Health Office, Rupandehi, Annual Target 2013/2014]. A total of 735 mother-infant pairs (rural 378, urban 357) were recruited from 15 randomly selected village development committees and 12 communities of two municipalities. A few urban women (n = 18) declined to be interviewed whereas all women participated in the rural areas [14]. Lists of eligible mothers were compiled in the selected areas with the help of local female community volunteers. Recruitment from each community was proportionate to its number of expected infants per month. The inclusion criteria were: singleton birth; age of infant <30 days; resident of the community; and the child was alive at the time of recruitment.
Fig. 1

Study flow chart

Study flow chart Face-to-face interviews were conducted by trained female enumerators using questions adapted from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey [15] and a previous questionnaire validated in central Nepal [7]. To obtain information on obstetric complications, common symptoms were read to mothers so that they could respond ‘yes’ or ‘no’ [16]. The list included: (1) antenatal: heavy bleeding (soaked clothes/bed/floor), swollen hands, fits or loss of consciousness, blurred vision, severe headache, severe fever, severe abdominal pain, and severe vomiting; (2) intranatal: heavy bleeding(soaked clothes/bed/floor), prolonged labor (12 hours or more), retained placenta (placenta not delivered within 30 minutes), swollen hands, and fits or loss of consciousness; (3) postnatal: heavy bleeding (soaked clothes/bed/floor), severe fever, foul smelling watery discharge, swollen hands, and fits or loss of consciousness. The choice was spontaneous and also kept as open ended to allow the recording of signs and symptoms not captured by our questionnaire. However, confirmation of obstetric morbidities through clinical audit was not feasible. Ethics approval of the study protocol was obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council (773/2014) and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Curtin University (approval number HR184/2013). Mothers provided consent for themselves. Personal identifiers were removed from the dataset before statistical analyses and only aggregated data were reported.

Definitions and variables

The outcome variables were complications during pregnancy and childbirth. The method of delivery was either cesarean or vaginal. Stillbirth was specified as death of a fetus after 28 weeks of gestation [17] and recorded for the previous birth only. Prolonged labor was defined as lasting12 hours or more. Heavy bleeding was defined as bleeding that soaked clothes, bed or floor of the room [7]. Independent variables were identified based on literature review. We recoded maternal age (years) as: 15–19, 20–29, and 30–45; maternal education as: ‘no education’ , ‘primary/lower secondary’ (up to grade 8), ‘secondary’ (grade 9–10) and ‘higher’ (grade 11–12 and university degree). Paternal occupation was classified as: ‘employed’ (salaried job), ‘semi-employed’ (labor, business and foreign labor), and ‘unemployed’ (no paid job, and unpaid subsistent agriculture). Household assets (water source, toilet facility, types of cooking fuel, separate kitchen, floor material, electricity, radio, television, mobile phones and cupboard) were assigned scores using principal component analysis to generate a wealth index, which was then categorized into the lowest (poorest) to the highest (richest) quintile [16] and further re-grouped into three levels to facilitate analysis: ‘poor’ (lowest 40 %), ‘middle’ (middle 40 %) and ‘rich’ (upper 20 %) [18].

Statistical analysis

The prevalence of obstetric complications, stillbirth and cesarean delivery were reported as the proportion of participants in this study. The rural–urban difference in cesarean section rate was confirmed by a multivariable logistic regression model with the backward stepwise method to control for confounding variables. All data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM, SPSS version 20).

Results

A total of 735 participants were enrolled in the study, whose characteristics are presented in Table 1. The average age was 24.6 (SD 4.6) years, with the majority (74.8 %) within the 20–25 years age group. About a quarter (26.0 %) of the women had no formal education. Most of their partners (70.0 %) were semi-employed, and one-fifth of participants (19.8 %) came from rich families. In terms of antenatal care, the great majority (76.2 %) of mothers paid four or more visits. In total, 314 (42.8 %) of them were primiparous and 88.2 % delivered in a health facility.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants, Nepal (n = 735)

CharacteristicsFrequencyPercentage
Maternal agea
 15–19 years999.0
 20–29 years54974.8
 30–45 years11916.2
Maternal education
 No education19226.0
 Primary to lower secondary24333.1
 Secondary and above30040.8
Paternal occupation
 Employed10213.9
 Semi-employed51670.2
 Unemployed11715.9
Place of residence
 Rural37851.4
 Urban35748.6
Wealth status
 Poor29540.1
 Middle29540.1
 Rich14519.8
Maternal heighta
 <150 cm25434.9
 ≥150 cm47465.1
Frequency of antenatal care
 No visit172.3
 1 to 3 visits15721.4
 4 or more visits55876.2
Paritya
 Primiparous31442.8
 Multiparous42057.2

aMissing data present

Characteristics of participants, Nepal (n = 735) aMissing data present Table 2 lists the adverse obstetric symptoms as reported by our participants. In the antenatal period, 145 mothers (19.7 %) reported complications, compared to 204 (27.8 %) in the intranatal and 159 (21.6 %) in the postnatal period. During the antenatal period, foul smelling vaginal discharge (6.5 %), and swelling of hands (6.1 %) were the most common symptoms. During the intranatal period, prolonged labor (11.3 %), heavy bleeding (10.1 %) and swelling of hands (7.5 %) were commonly reported. During the postnatal period, swelling of hands (7.8 %) and high fever (4.2 %) were the main problems experienced by the mothers. No significant difference in the reported morbidities was found between primi-parous and multiparous woman.
Table 2

Adverse obstetric symptoms during antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods

ProblemsFrequencyPercentage
Antenatal14519.7
 Some bleeding638.5
 Heavy bleeding101.3
 High fever304.0
 Foul smelling vaginal discharge486.5
 Swelling of hands456.1
 Fits or loss of consciousness121.6
Intranatal20427.8
 Heavy bleeding7410.1
 Prolonged labor:12 to 23 hours8311.3
 Prolonged labor: 24 to 47 hours202.7
 Prolonged labor: 48 hours or more131.8
 Retained placenta: 30 min to <1 hour243.3
 Retained placenta:1 hour or more10.1
 Swelling of hands557.5
 Fits or loss of consciousness141.9
Postnatal15921.6
 Heavy bleeding121.6
 High fever314.2
 Foul smelling discharge263.5
 Swelling of hands577.8
 Fits or loss of consciousness121.6
Adverse obstetric symptoms during antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods A total of 81 (11.0 %) mothers reported a stillbirth previously, and 104 (14.1 %) mothers had cesarean section. There was a significant difference in cesarean delivery prevalence by location (p <0.001), with only 22 (5.8 %) of the 378 rural women had cesarean section compared to 82 (23.0 %) of the 357 urban women. On the other hand, prolonged labor (>12 hours) and heavy bleeding appeared to be more common in rural areas, where 72 (19.0 %) rural mothers reported having a prolonged labor as compared to 40 (11.2 %) urban mothers (p = 0.03). Similarly, 63 (16.7 %) rural mothers mentioned the signs of heavy bleeding during the intranatal period, as contrasted to only 11 (3.1 %) mothers residing in urban areas (p < 0.001). As shown in Table 3, logistic regression analysis confirmed the higher risk of incurring a cesarean delivery for these urban women relative to their rural counterparts (adjusted odds ratio 3.41, 95 % confidence interval 2.01 to 5.78).
Table 3

Factors associated with cesarean delivery in Western Nepal

FactorsAdjusted odds ratioa P
Place of residence<0.001
 Rural1.00
 Urban3.41 (2.01, 5.78)
Maternal education<0.001
 No education1.00
 Primary to lower secondary0.83 (0.38, 1.83)
 Secondary and above2.56 (1.28, 5.14)
Parity0.010
 Multiparous1.00
 Primiparous1.85 (1.16, 2.95)

aIndependent variables excluded from the stepwise logistic regression model were paternal occupation, wealth status, maternal age, frequency of antenatal care, and maternal height

Factors associated with cesarean delivery in Western Nepal aIndependent variables excluded from the stepwise logistic regression model were paternal occupation, wealth status, maternal age, frequency of antenatal care, and maternal height

Discussion

An important finding is the unequal distribution of cesarean delivery across rural and urban areas. Rural mothers suffered more from adverse obstetric symptoms during the intranatal period. While the overall cesarean section rate of 14.1 % was within the World Health Organization’s recommended rate of 5 % to 15 % [19], a significantly higher rate of 23 % was evident in urban areas. Our result was consistent with previous studies conducted in South Asia [7, 20]. After a major reform in 2005, the Nepal health care system provides maternity services including cesarean delivery to its citizens free of charge at public facilities [21], and pays an allowance to cover travel expenses of the mother. With such initiatives, facility delivery rate has been successfully increased from 9 % in 2001 [22] to 35.3 % in 2011 [15], and especially high (73.1 %) in some accessible areas of Nepal [23]. Moreover, many public and private hospitals can now perform cesarean sections. Under these circumstances, the higher cesarean delivery rate in urban areas might merely reflect ‘on-demand’ or ‘provider initiated’ without a medical indication. Similar trends have been witnessed in South Asia and elsewhere [20]. Our findings on the rural–urban differentials in cesarean delivery rate and obstetric complications also reflect an uneven distribution of health services in Nepal. Provider-induced cesarean sections have potential adverse consequences, in terms of increasing the health care costs, and unnecessary occupation of hospital beds leading to overcrowding in tertiary hospitals. Further investigations would confirm whether those cesarean sections performed were indeed medically warranted. Stillbirth is another problem for intervention that has received relatively little attention so far. Our observed prevalence of 11 % in Western Nepal was higher than the previous reported rate of 3.13 % in the Dhanusha district [24] but comparable with another hospital-based estimate of 13.3 % [25]. Recently, a verbal autopsy study to ascertain the causes of neonatal death in 2013 revealed that 37.9 % of the 551 deceased newborns were stillbirths, and fresh stillbirths accounted for 72.7 % of these cases [26]. Such in-depth assessment suggested the necessity to improve quality of care during childbirth, since 45 % of stillbirths could be averted by existing interventions [27]. This has important implications for Nepal because fresh stillbirths remain a major problem yet the quality of care is low during the intranatal period [28]. About one in five mothers reported adverse obstetric symptoms during the antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods. Our result was similar to that of a previous study conducted in the Kaski district of central Nepal [7], but substantially lower than the 42.9 % postnatal morbidity incidence reported in Gadchiroli, India [29]. It should be remarked that the underlying settings were quite different, especially in terms of place of delivery. While the home delivery rate was only 11.8 % in the present study, it was 94.9 % in Gadchiroli, India. In light of the recent earthquakes, where more than 126,000 pregnant women were adversely affected or displaced, cesarean delivery services have not been restored in most of the earthquake affected districts, while two-third of birth centers were either destroyed or non-functional [30, 31], the progress made in maternal health since the 1990’s may be reversed so that urgent attention is required. Heavy bleeding and prolonged labor are found to be common obstetric problems, both of which signal an immediate need for emergency obstetric care from skilled birth attendant and possible cesarean section. Although urban hospitals are capable to provide cesarean section and manage obstetric complications, such facilities and services are still lacking in the rural and remote mountainous areas of Nepal. Antenatal screening and early referral of rural mothers at risk would prevent maternal mortality and minimize the severe consequences of maternal morbidity. However, since some of the adverse maternal outcomes such as postpartum hemorrhage and sepsis cannot be predicted by screening alone, provision of emergency obstetric care within reach of the local community is important to save the lives of mothers. Since 2008/2009, the Ministry of Health and Population of Nepal has started allocating special funds for comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care to cover the cost of equipment and health workforce for cesarean delivery [32]. It is still unknown whether this government initiative can reduce the burden of severe intranatal obstetric morbidity. A major strength of the current study was the short recall time for the obstetric events since all interviews were conducted within 30 days postpartum. It also highlights the rural–urban difference in cesarean delivery rate and the prevalent obstetric complications in the Rupandehi district of Western Nepal, where maternal mortality was significantly higher than the national average [6]. Nevertheless, the self-reporting of signs and symptoms posed as the main limitation. In Nepal where the health information system is poorly maintained, information retrieved from hospital and government databases is unlikely to be accurate and reliable, even though record reviews have been cited as an important data source [33]. Therefore, self-reporting has been commonly relied upon in poor resource settings [7, 29, 34], despite the difficulty to obtain obstetric details from the mothers due to stigma, social and cultural reasons. In this study, the mothers were prompted with a comprehensive list of signs and symptoms that could occur during the antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods, so that the reported prevalence of such events would reflect the true community situation. Another limitation concerns the lack of data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth, pre-term birth and early neonatal deaths, without verbal autopsy, clinical audit and access to hospital records. Similarly, detailed investigation of the birth process, including treatment and medication used to augment labor, was not feasible given our budget constraint and available resources. Further studies are recommended to examine these issues especially stillbirths [35] and to confirm the impact of government incentives on cesarean rates.

Conclusion

This study found that about one in five mothers had obstetric complications in Western Nepal. Furthermore, 11 % of mothers reported having a stillbirth, and 14 % of them underwent cesarean section. While prolonged labor and heavy bleeding were more common among rural mothers, the rate of cesarean section was more than four times higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Future public health interventions should focus on increasing access to obstetric services in rural areas, and the prevention of stillbirths through the provision of quality maternity care. Further investigations are also required to determine whether the cesarean sections conducted in urban areas are medically warranted or provider induced.

Details of ethics approval

Nepal Health Research Council (773/2014) and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Curtin University (approval number HR184/2013).
  18 in total

1.  Maternal morbidity during labour and the puerperium in rural homes and the need for medical attention: A prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India.

Authors:  Rani A Bang; Abhay T Bang; M Hanimi Reddy; Mahesh D Deshmukh; Sanjay B Baitule; Veronique Filippi
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Risk factors associated with still births.

Authors:  S R Shrestha; B K Yadav
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.406

3.  Sustaining progress in maternal and child health in Nepal.

Authors:  Vishnu Khanal; Pratik Khanal; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Obstetric complications and cesarean delivery in Nepal.

Authors:  Rajendra Karkee; Andy H Lee; Vishnu Khanal; Paras K Pokharel; Colin W Binns
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Birth preparedness and skilled attendance at birth in Nepal: implications for achieving millennium development goal 5.

Authors:  Rajendra Karkee; Andy H Lee; Colin W Binns
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Bypassing birth centres for childbirth: an analysis of data from a community-based prospective cohort study in Nepal.

Authors:  Rajendra Karkee; Andy H Lee; Colin W Binns
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.344

7.  Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kassebaum; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Megan S Coggeshall; Katya A Shackelford; Caitlyn Steiner; Kyle R Heuton; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Ryan Barber; Chantal Huynh; Daniel Dicker; Tara Templin; Timothy M Wolock; Ayse Abbasoglu Ozgoren; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw Ferede Abera; Ibrahim Abubakar; Tom Achoki; Ademola Adelekan; Zanfina Ademi; Arsène Kouablan Adou; José C Adsuar; Emilie E Agardh; Dickens Akena; Deena Alasfoor; Zewdie Aderaw Alemu; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Samia Alhabib; Raghib Ali; Mazin J Al Kahbouri; François Alla; Peter J Allen; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ubai Alsharif; Elena Alvarez; Nelson Alvis-Guzmán; Adansi A Amankwaa; Azmeraw T Amare; Hassan Amini; Walid Ammar; Carl A T Antonio; Palwasha Anwari; Johan Arnlöv; Valentina S Arsic Arsenijevic; Ali Artaman; Majed Masoud Asad; Rana J Asghar; Reza Assadi; Lydia S Atkins; Alaa Badawi; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Arindam Basu; Sanjay Basu; Justin Beardsley; Neeraj Bedi; Tolesa Bekele; Michelle L Bell; Eduardo Bernabe; Tariku J Beyene; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Jed D Blore; Berrak Bora Basara; Dipan Bose; Nicholas Breitborde; Rosario Cárdenas; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Ruben Estanislao Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Alanur Cavlin; Jung-Chen Chang; Xuan Che; Costas A Christophi; Sumeet S Chugh; Massimo Cirillo; Samantha M Colquhoun; Leslie Trumbull Cooper; Cyrus Cooper; Iuri da Costa Leite; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Louisa Degenhardt; Diego De Leo; Borja del Pozo-Cruz; Kebede Deribe; Muluken Dessalegn; Gabrielle A deVeber; Samath D Dharmaratne; Uğur Dilmen; Eric L Ding; Rob E Dorrington; Tim R Driscoll; Sergei Petrovich Ermakov; Alireza Esteghamati; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Farshad Farzadfar; Manuela Mendonca Felicio; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Graça Maria Ferreira de Lima; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Elisabeth B França; Lynne Gaffikin; Ketevan Gambashidze; Fortuné Gbètoho Gankpé; Ana C Garcia; Johanna M Geleijnse; Katherine B Gibney; Maurice Giroud; Elizabeth L Glaser; Ketevan Goginashvili; Philimon Gona; Dinorah González-Castell; Atsushi Goto; Hebe N Gouda; Harish Chander Gugnani; Rahul Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Mouhanad Hammami; Graeme J Hankey; Hilda L Harb; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Ileana B Heredia Pi; Hans W Hoek; H Dean Hosgood; Damian G Hoy; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Kaire Innos; Manami Inoue; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Eiman Jahangir; Sun Ha Jee; Paul N Jensen; Vivekanand Jha; Guohong Jiang; Jost B Jonas; Knud Juel; Edmond Kato Kabagambe; Haidong Kan; Nadim E Karam; André Karch; Corine Kakizi Karema; Anil Kaul; Norito Kawakami; Konstantin Kazanjan; Dhruv S Kazi; Andrew H Kemp; Andre Pascal Kengne; Maia Kereselidze; Yousef Saleh Khader; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Ejaz Ahmed Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Luke Knibbs; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; Chanda Kulkarni; Veena S Kulkarni; G Anil Kumar; Kaushalendra Kumar; Ravi B Kumar; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Ratilal Lalloo; Hilton Lam; Van C Lansingh; Anders Larsson; Jong-Tae Lee; James Leigh; Mall Leinsalu; Ricky Leung; Xiaohong Li; Yichong Li; Yongmei Li; Juan Liang; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Hsien-Ho Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Shiwei Liu; Yang Liu; Belinda K Lloyd; Stephanie J London; Paulo A Lotufo; Jixiang Ma; Stefan Ma; Vasco Manuel Pedro Machado; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; Marek Majdan; Christopher Chabila Mapoma; Wagner Marcenes; Melvin Barrientos Marzan; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Man Mohan Mehndiratta; Fabiola Mejia-Rodriguez; Ziad A Memish; Walter Mendoza; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Ali H Mokdad; Glen Liddell Mola; Lorenzo Monasta; Jonathan de la Cruz Monis; Julio Cesar Montañez Hernandez; Ami R Moore; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Rintaro Mori; Ulrich O Mueller; Mitsuru Mukaigawara; Aliya Naheed; Kovin S Naidoo; Devina Nand; Vinay Nangia; Denis Nash; Chakib Nejjari; Robert G Nelson; Sudan Prasad Neupane; Charles R Newton; Marie Ng; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Sandra Nolte; Ole F Norheim; Luke Nyakarahuka; In-Hwan Oh; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Bolajoko O Olusanya; Saad B Omer; John Nelson Opio; Orish Ebere Orisakwe; Jeyaraj D Pandian; Christina Papachristou; Jae-Hyun Park; Angel J Paternina Caicedo; Scott B Patten; Vinod K Paul; Boris Igor Pavlin; Neil Pearce; David M Pereira; Konrad Pesudovs; Max Petzold; Dan Poenaru; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; Dan Pope; Farshad Pourmalek; Dima Qato; D Alex Quistberg; Anwar Rafay; Kazem Rahimi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Sajjad ur Rahman; Murugesan Raju; Saleem M Rana; Amany Refaat; Luca Ronfani; Nobhojit Roy; Tania Georgina Sánchez Pimienta; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Felix Sayinzoga; Ione J C Schneider; Austin Schumacher; David C Schwebel; Soraya Seedat; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Edson E Servan-Mori; Marina Shakh-Nazarova; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Kenji Shibuya; Hwashin Hyun Shin; Ivy Shiue; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Donald H Silberberg; Andrea P Silva; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Karen Sliwa; Sergey S Soshnikov; Luciano A Sposato; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Roberto Tchio Talongwa; Feng Tan; Carolina Maria Teixeira; Eric Yeboah Tenkorang; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi; Andrew L Thorne-Lyman; David L Tirschwell; Jeffrey A Towbin; Bach X Tran; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris; Uche S Uchendu; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Eduardo A Undurraga; Selen Begüm Uzun; Andrew J Vallely; Coen H van Gool; Tommi J Vasankari; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Salvador Villalpando; Francesco S Violante; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Theo Vos; Stephen Waller; Haidong Wang; Linhong Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Yanping Wang; Scott Weichenthal; Elisabete Weiderpass; Robert G Weintraub; Ronny Westerman; James D Wilkinson; Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes; John Q Wong; Muluemebet Abera Wordofa; Gelin Xu; Yang C Yang; Yuichiro Yano; Gokalp Kadri Yentur; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Seok-Jun Yoon; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Kim Yun Jin; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Yong Zhao; Yingfeng Zheng; Maigeng Zhou; Jun Zhu; Xiao Nong Zou; Alan D Lopez; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher J L Murray; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kingsley E Agho; Michael J Dibley; Justice I Odiase; Sunday M Ogbonmwan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.

Authors:  Melissa Neuman; Glyn Alcock; Kishwar Azad; Abdul Kuddus; David Osrin; Neena Shah More; Nirmala Nair; Prasanta Tripathy; Catherine Sikorski; Naomi Saville; Aman Sen; Tim Colbourn; Tanja A J Houweling; Nadine Seward; Dharma S Manandhar; Bhim P Shrestha; Anthony Costello; Audrey Prost
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A community-based prospective cohort study of exclusive breastfeeding in central Nepal.

Authors:  Rajendra Karkee; Andy H Lee; Vishnu Khanal; Colin W Binns
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of maternal height on the risk of caesarean section in singleton births: evidence from a large-scale survey in India.

Authors:  Strong P Marbaniang; Hemkhothang Lhungdim; Himanshu Chaurasia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006-2016.

Authors:  Kiran Acharya; Yuba Raj Paudel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Rates, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries: A comparison of tribal and non-tribal women in Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Gayatri Desai; Ankit Anand; Dhiren Modi; Shobha Shah; Kalpana Shah; Ajay Shah; Shrey Desai; Pankaj Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Disclosing suboptimal indications for emergency caesarean sections due to fetal distress and prolonged labor: a multicenter cross-sectional study at 12 public hospitals in Nepal.

Authors:  Helena Litorp; Rejina Gurung; Mats Målqvist; Ashish Kc
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Trends in national and subnational wealth related inequalities in use of maternal health care services in Nepal: an analysis using demographic and health surveys (2001-2016).

Authors:  Vishnu Prasad Sapkota; Umesh Prasad Bhusal; Kiran Acharya
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Prevalence and Factors Associated With Caesarean Delivery in Nepal: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Sample.

Authors:  Pranta Das; Nandeeta Samad; Ashmita Sapkota; Hasan Al-Banna; Nor Azlina A Rahman; Rahnuma Ahmad; Mainul Haque; Brian Godman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-10

7.  Hukou-based rural-urban disparities in maternal health service utilization and delivery modes in two Chinese cities in Guangdong Province.

Authors:  Menghan Shen; Yushan Wu; Xin Xiang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-06-22

8.  Patterns of caesarean section in HIV infected and non-infected women in Malawi: is caesarean section used for PMTCT?

Authors:  Lyson Tenthani; Joep J van Oosterhout; Andreas D Haas; Malango Msukwa; Nozgechi Phiri; Frank Chimbwandira; Kali Tal; Karoline Aebi-Popp; Janne Estill; Olivia Keiser
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.

Authors:  Priyanka Singh; Gulfam Hashmi; Prafulla Kumar Swain
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Comparison of Different Blood Transfusion Methods in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Fei Guo; Heshan Tang; Xiaoqiang Wei
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.