Literature DB >> 26931387

Innate and adaptive immune responses to tick-borne flavivirus infection in sheep.

Karen L Mansfield1, Nicholas Johnson2, Ashley C Banyard2, Alejandro Núñez3, Matthew Baylis4, Tom Solomon5, Anthony R Fooks6.   

Abstract

The flaviviruses tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and louping ill virus (LIV) are closely-related genetically and antigenically, have broadly similar host ranges that include rodents and other mammals (including sheep), and are both transmitted by the same tick species, Ixodes ricinus. Although human infection with TBEV results in a febrile illness followed in some cases by encephalitis, humans appear to be much less susceptible to infection with LIV. However, these viruses demonstrate different susceptibilities in sheep; LIV infection causes encephalitic disease, whereas TBEV infection generally does not. To investigate the role of the immune response in this mixed outcome, groups of sheep were inoculated with either virus, or with a primary inoculation with one virus and secondary inoculation with the other. Markers of both adaptive and innate immune responses were measured. In each group studied, infection resulted in seroconversion, demonstrated by the detection of virus specific neutralising antibodies. This appeared to control infection with TBEV but not LIV, which progressed to a febrile infection, with transient viraemia and elevated levels of serum interferon. This was followed by neuroinvasion, leading to up-regulation of innate immune transcripts in discrete areas of the brain, including interferon inducible genes and chemokines. Prior inoculation with TBEV did not prevent infection with LIV, but did appear to reduce disease severity and viraemia. We postulate that LIV has adapted to replicate efficiently in sheep cells, and disseminate rapidly following infection. By contrast, TBEV fails to disseminate in sheep and is controlled by the immune response. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive; Immune; Innate; Sheep; Tick-borne virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26931387     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  3 in total

1.  Experimental infection of lambs with tick-borne encephalitis virus and co-infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

Authors:  Katrine M Paulsen; Erik G Granquist; Wenche Okstad; Rose Vikse; Karin Stiasny; Åshild K Andreassen; Snorre Stuen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Tick-Pathogen Interactions and Vector Competence: Identification of Molecular Drivers for Tick-Borne Diseases.

Authors:  José de la Fuente; Sandra Antunes; Sarah Bonnet; Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; Ana G Domingos; Agustín Estrada-Peña; Nicholas Johnson; Katherine M Kocan; Karen L Mansfield; Ard M Nijhof; Anna Papa; Nataliia Rudenko; Margarita Villar; Pilar Alberdi; Alessandra Torina; Nieves Ayllón; Marie Vancova; Maryna Golovchenko; Libor Grubhoffer; Santo Caracappa; Anthony R Fooks; Christian Gortazar; Ryan O M Rego
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 3.  Tick-Borne Flaviviruses and the Type I Interferon Response.

Authors:  Richard Lindqvist; Arunkumar Upadhyay; Anna K Överby
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.