Literature DB >> 2693078

Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients.

P J Hangartner1, R Münch, J Meier, R Ammann, H Bühler.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomized clinical trial, three colon cleansing methods for colonoscopy were compared with regard to a) side effects, b) patient acceptance, c) residual liquid and stool during colonoscopy, and d) quality of the examination. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups for colon preparation: Group 1 (n = 100) 4 liters of Golytely, group 2 (n = 102) 2 liters of Golytely combined with Cascara-Salax, and group 3 (n = 98) X-Prep (a Senna preparation) combined with an enema. X-Prep (group 3) caused significantly more abdominal cramps than 4 liters of Golytely (group 1) or 2 liters of Golytely with Cascara-Salax (group 2) (p less than 0.001). Vomiting was most frequent in group 1 (p less than 0.05 vs. group 3). The patients therefore preferred X-Prep to 4 liters of Golytely (p less than 0.01). The cleanest colon was obtained with 4 liters of Golytely, while 2 liters of Golytely with Cascara-Salax was least efficacious. The quality of the examination was equal in groups 1 and 3, and clearly better than in group 2 (p less than 0.01). We thus conclude that while 4 liters of Golytely and X-Prep plus enema have equivalent cleansing efficacy for colonoscopy, patients judged X-Prep to be less unpleasant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2693078     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1012967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

Review 1.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Comparative study of two bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution.

Authors:  Savit Kositchaiwat; Weerapat Suwanthanmma; Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul; Vaewvadee Tiewthanom; Prisna Rerkpatanakit; Chaowalitr Tinkornrusmee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  A review of current issues underlying colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; William T Depew; Stephen J Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Polyethylene glycol versus sodium picosulfalte bowel preparation in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Omar Kherad; Sophie Restellini; Myriam Martel; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-24

6.  The quest for a more acceptable bowel preparation: comparison of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution and a mannitol/Picolax mixture for colonoscopy.

Authors:  B P Saunders; T Masaki; M Fukumoto; S Halligan; C B Williams
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Functionalization of anthracene: A selective route to brominated 1,4-anthraquinones.

Authors:  Kiymet Berkil Akar; Osman Cakmak; Orhan Büyükgüngör; Ertan Sahin
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.883

8.  Two low-dose bowel-cleansing regimens: efficacy and safety of senna and sodium phosphorus solution for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Orhan Kursat Poyrazoglu; Mehmet Yalniz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.