Suzanne M Peters1, Ilona J Pinter2, Helen H J Pothuizen3, Raymond C de Heer2, Johanneke E van der Harst2, Berry M Spruijt4. 1. Delta Phenomics B.V., Nistelrooisebaan 3, NL-5374 RE Schaijk, The Netherlands; Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.m.peters@uu.nl. 2. Delta Phenomics B.V., Nistelrooisebaan 3, NL-5374 RE Schaijk, The Netherlands; Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Delta Phenomics B.V., Nistelrooisebaan 3, NL-5374 RE Schaijk, The Netherlands. 4. Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.m.spruijt@uu.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the past, studies in behavioral neuroscience and drug development have relied on simple and quick readout parameters of animal behavior to assess treatment efficacy or to understand underlying brain mechanisms. The predominant use of classical behavioral tests has been repeatedly criticized during the last decades because of their poor reproducibility, poor translational value and the limited explanatory power in functional terms. NEW METHOD: We present a new method to monitor social behavior of rats using automated video tracking. The velocity of moving and the distance between two rats were plotted in frequency distributions. In addition, behavior was manually annotated and related to the automatically obtained parameters for a validated interpretation. RESULTS: Inter-individual distance in combination with velocity of movement provided specific behavioral classes, such as moving with high velocity when "in contact" or "in proximity". Human observations showed that these classes coincide with following (chasing) behavior. In addition, when animals are "in contact", but at low velocity, behaviors such as allogrooming and social investigation were observed. Also, low dose treatment with morphine and short isolation increased the time animals spent in contact or in proximity at high velocity. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Current methods that involve the investigation of social rat behavior are mostly limited to short and relatively simple manual observations. CONCLUSION: A new and automated method for analyzing social behavior in a social interaction test is presented here and shows to be sensitive to drug treatment and housing conditions known to influence social behavior in rats.
BACKGROUND: In the past, studies in behavioral neuroscience and drug development have relied on simple and quick readout parameters of animal behavior to assess treatment efficacy or to understand underlying brain mechanisms. The predominant use of classical behavioral tests has been repeatedly criticized during the last decades because of their poor reproducibility, poor translational value and the limited explanatory power in functional terms. NEW METHOD: We present a new method to monitor social behavior of rats using automated video tracking. The velocity of moving and the distance between two rats were plotted in frequency distributions. In addition, behavior was manually annotated and related to the automatically obtained parameters for a validated interpretation. RESULTS: Inter-individual distance in combination with velocity of movement provided specific behavioral classes, such as moving with high velocity when "in contact" or "in proximity". Human observations showed that these classes coincide with following (chasing) behavior. In addition, when animals are "in contact", but at low velocity, behaviors such as allogrooming and social investigation were observed. Also, low dose treatment with morphine and short isolation increased the time animals spent in contact or in proximity at high velocity. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Current methods that involve the investigation of social rat behavior are mostly limited to short and relatively simple manual observations. CONCLUSION: A new and automated method for analyzing social behavior in a social interaction test is presented here and shows to be sensitive to drug treatment and housing conditions known to influence social behavior in rats.
Authors: Giuseppe Manfré; Arianna Novati; Ilaria Faccini; Andrea C Rossetti; Kari Bosch; Raffaella Molteni; Marco A Riva; Johanneke E Van der Harst; Huu Phuc Nguyen; Judith R Homberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240