Literature DB >> 26930478

Subject-specific geometrical detail rather than cost function formulation affects hip loading calculation.

Mariska Wesseling1, Friedl De Groote1, Lode Bosmans1, Ward Bartels2,3, Christophe Meyer4, Kaat Desloovere4, Ilse Jonkers1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the relative importance of introducing an increasing level of medical image-based subject-specific detail in bone and muscle geometry in the musculoskeletal model, on calculated hip contact forces during gait. These forces were compared to introducing minimization of hip contact forces in the optimization criterion. With an increasing level of subject-specific detail, specifically MRI-based geometry and wrapping surfaces representing the hip capsule, hip contact forces decreased and were more comparable to contact forces measured using instrumented prostheses (average difference of 0.69 BW at the first peak compared to 1.04 BW for the generic model). Inclusion of subject-specific wrapping surfaces in the model had a greater effect than altering the cost function definition.

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal modeling; imaging; optimization criterion; subject-specific

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26930478     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1154547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  8 in total

1.  Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait.

Authors:  Ke Song; Brecca M M Gaffney; Kevin B Shelburne; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Femoral version deformities alter joint reaction forces in dysplastic hips during gait.

Authors:  Molly C Shepherd; Brecca M M Gaffney; Ke Song; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Bioinspired Technologies to Connect Musculoskeletal Mechanobiology to the Person for Training and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; David G Lloyd; Rod S Barrett; Jill L Cook; Ming H Zheng; Thor F Besier; David J Saxby
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Influence of musculotendon geometry variability in muscle forces and hip bone-on-bone forces during walking.

Authors:  E Martín-Sosa; J Martínez-Reina; J Mayo; J Ojeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Systematic Review of the Associations Between Inverse Dynamics and Musculoskeletal Modeling to Investigate Joint Loading in a Clinical Environment.

Authors:  Jana Holder; Ursula Trinler; Andrea Meurer; Felix Stief
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  MRI-based anatomical characterisation of lower-limb muscles in older women.

Authors:  Erica Montefiori; Barbara M Kalkman; William H Henson; Margaret A Paggiosi; Eugene V McCloskey; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Advancing quantitative techniques to improve understanding of the skeletal structure-function relationship.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Elizabeth L Brainerd; Karen L Troy; Sandra J Shefelbine; Janet L Ronsky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Refining muscle geometry and wrapping in the TLEM 2 model for improved hip contact force prediction.

Authors:  Enrico De Pieri; Morten E Lund; Anantharaman Gopalakrishnan; Kasper P Rasmussen; David E Lunn; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.