Literature DB >> 26930271

An ex Vivo Model for Evaluating Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, Efflux, and Drug Metabolism.

Karin Hellman1, Peter Aadal Nielsen2, Fredrik Ek1, Roger Olsson1.   

Abstract

The metabolism of drugs in the brain is difficult to study in most species because of enzymatic instability in vitro and interference from peripheral metabolism in vivo. A locust ex vivo model that combines brain barrier penetration, efflux, metabolism, and analysis of the unbound fraction in intact brains was evaluated using known drugs. Clozapine was analyzed, and its major metabolites, clozapine N-oxide (CNO) and N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), were identified and quantified. The back-transformation of CNO into clozapine observed in humans was also observed in locusts. In addition, risperidone, citalopram, fluoxetine, and haloperidol were studied, and one preselected metabolite for each drug was analyzed, identified, and quantified. Metabolite identification studies of clozapine and midazolam showed that the locust brain was highly metabolically active, and 18 and 14 metabolites, respectively, were identified. The unbound drug fraction of clozapine, NDMC, carbamazepine, and risperidone was analyzed. In addition, coadministration of drugs with verapamil or fluvoxamine was performed to evaluate drug-drug interactions in all setups. All findings correlated well with the data in the literature for mammals except for the stated fact that CNO is a highly blood-brain barrier permeant compound. Overall, the experiments indicated that invertebrates might be useful for screening of blood-brain barrier permeation, efflux, metabolism, and analysis of the unbound fraction of drugs in the brain in early drug discovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Locust; blood−brain barrier; brain; drug metabolism; drug−drug interactions; efflux

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26930271     DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  7 in total

1.  CNO Evil? Considerations for the Use of DREADDs in Behavioral Neuroscience.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Metabolism and Distribution of Clozapine-N-oxide: Implications for Nonhuman Primate Chemogenetics.

Authors:  Jessica Raper; Ryan D Morrison; J Scott Daniels; Leonard Howell; Jocelyne Bachevalier; Thomas Wichmann; Adriana Galvan
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 3.  Optogenetics and pharmacogenetics: principles and applications.

Authors:  Jingwei Jiang; Huxing Cui; Kamal Rahmouni
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Development of an a priori computational approach for brain uptake of compounds in an insect model system.

Authors:  Werner J Geldenhuys; Jeffrey R Bloomquist
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  DREADD Agonist 21 Is an Effective Agonist for Muscarinic-Based DREADDs in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Karen J Thompson; Elham Khajehali; Sophie J Bradley; Jovana S Navarrete; Xi Ping Huang; Samuel Slocum; Jian Jin; Jing Liu; Yan Xiong; Reid H J Olsen; Jeffrey F Diberto; Kristen M Boyt; Melanie M Pina; Dipanwita Pati; Colin Molloy; Christoffer Bundgaard; Patrick M Sexton; Thomas L Kash; Michael J Krashes; Arthur Christopoulos; Bryan L Roth; Andrew B Tobin
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 6.  Looking at Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing from the Perspective of an Invertebrate Embryo.

Authors:  Gerd Bicker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  DREADDs in Epilepsy Research: Network-Based Review.

Authors:  John-Sebastian Mueller; Fabio Cesar Tescarollo; Hai Sun
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.261

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.