Literature DB >> 26929779

The safety and efficacy of single balloon enteroscopy in the elderly.

Ashley H Davis-Yadley1, Seth Lipka2, Andrea C Rodriguez3, Kirbylee K Nelson3, Vignesh Doraiswamy4, Roshanak Rabbanifard2, Ambuj Kumar5, Patrick G Brady2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) is an important tool in the management of small bowel disease with limited data available on its performance in the elderly. We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of SBE in the elderly.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 366 patients undergoing 428 SBEs from 2010 to 2014. Patients were divided into different age groups: control <55, 55-64, 65-74 and ⩾75 years. Data on comorbidities, complications, findings, diagnostic and therapeutic yield were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Anterograde and retrograde SBE were performed in 340 and 49 patients, respectively, with 63 patients requiring more than 1 procedure. Diagnostic yield was significantly higher for age ⩾75 years compared with <55, 66.3% versus 50%, odds ratio (OR) 1.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-3.41]. Therapeutic yield was significantly higher in all three older age groups compared with <55 years, 20.3%: 55-64 years, 44.4%, OR 3.13(95% CI 1.7-5.78); 65-74 years, 42%, OR 2.84 (95% CI 1.59-5.06); and >75 years, 47.5%, OR 3.55 (95% CI 1.96-6.43). No significant difference was seen between age groups in complications or failures. Our overall complication rate was 2.3% with 5 minor and 5 major complications. There was a higher yield of angioectasias in the elderly. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and multipolar electrocoagulation were used more often in older age groups.
CONCLUSION: SBE is safe in elderly patients and delivers higher diagnostic and therapeutic yields compared to younger patients. The elderly are more likely to have angioectasias and undergo APC and electrocoagulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficacy; elderly; safety; single balloon enteroscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929779      PMCID: PMC4749853          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X15614517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  27 in total

1.  Safety of single-balloon enteroscopy: our experience of 72 procedures.

Authors:  M Manno; C Barbera; E Dabizzi; A Mussetto; R Conigliaro
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Complications of single-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures.

Authors:  H Aktas; L de Ridder; J Haringsma; E J Kuipers; P B Mensink
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.

Authors:  Andrea May; Lars Nachbar; Jürgen Pohl; Christian Ell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Reasons for and outcome of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 85 years or more: retrospective study.

Authors:  L Seinelä; J Ahvenainen; J Rönneikkö; M Haavisto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-29

5.  Long-term outcomes after single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Michael Tang; Johnathan Goodwin; Thomas G Hollander; Christine E Hovis; Faris M Murad; Daniel K Mullady; Riad R Azar; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda; Dayna S Early; Steven A Edmundowiz; Chien-Huan Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; George Paroutoglou; Jannis Kountouras; Christos Zavos; Athanasios Beltsis; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Double-balloon enteroscopy in the elderly: safety, findings, and diagnostic and therapeutic success.

Authors:  Sanjay R Hegde; Kevan Iffrig; Tianyu Li; Sharon Downey; Stephen J Heller; Jeffrey L Tokar; Oleh Haluszka
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Kenjiro Yasuda; Kiyohito Tanaka; Koji Uno; Moose Ueda; Kasumi Sanada; Masatsugu Nakajima
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Arteriovenous malformations of the bowel: an analysis of 22 cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  C T Meyer; F J Troncale; S Galloway; D G Sheahan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.

Authors:  P B F Mensink; J Haringsma; T Kucharzik; C Cellier; E Pérez-Cuadrado; K Mönkemüller; A Gasbarrini; A J Kaffes; K Nakamura; H H Yen; H Yamamoto
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Enteroscopy in the Elderly: Review of Procedural Aspects, Indications, Yield, and Safety.

Authors:  Ana Catarina Ribeiro Gomes; Rolando Pinho; Adélia Rodrigues; Ana Ponte; João Carvalho
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Technical and Clinical Aspects of Diagnostic Single-Balloon Enteroscopy in the First Decade of Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ye Gao; Lei Xin; Yi-Tong Zhang; Xiao-Rong Guo; Qian-Qian Meng; Zhao-Shen Li; Zhuan Liao
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.