Intravitreal ketorolac for the treatment of chronic cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To report two cases of chronic postoperative cystoid macular edema, resistant to topical therapy, treated with consecutive intravitreal injections of ketorolac tromethamine.
METHODS: Four daily intravitreal injections of 500 μg/0.05 mL of ketorolac were given to each patient. Complete clinical examination and OCT were performed before every injection, 1, 2, 3 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline examination, 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection.
RESULTS: In both cases, the edema regressed and visual acuity increased. At 6 months after the last injection, the leakage was significantly reduced at the fluorescein angiography. DISCUSSION: Both cases responded favorably to the consecutive intravitreal administration of ketorolac tromethamine. The long-lasting remission of the macular edema in these chronic cases underlines the therapeutic potential of these agents when delivered intravitreally.

Introduction

Postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME) represents a rare, self-limiting complication after intraocular surgery (< 1 % in uneventful operations), but sometimes it may become chronic (>6 months) and reduce the visual acuity (VA), especially in complicated cases.1

The treatment of postoperative CME remains problematic as well-designed large clinical trials with long-term follow-up are lacking.2 Topical nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have doubtful effect,3 while topical and intravitreal steroids have well-recognized side effects.

Due to their possible better safety profile, NSAIDs have recently attracted interest as alternative anti-inflammatory agents for intravitreal use. In clinical practice, intravitreal NSAIDs have been tested in most entities that result in macular edema such as Irvine-Gass syndrome,4–6 uveitic CME,7,8 and diabetic macular edema (DME).4,6,9,10

Ketorolac tromethamine is one of the NSAIDs that have been tested intravitreally and the agent that we have used in the present work. It is a nonselective COX-inhibitor and a small molecule (molecular weight: 255 Da) with a short clearance from the vitreous cavity (half-life ~3 hours after intravitreal administration in rabbits). It has a safe intravitreal toxicity profile 11–13 and in the past we were able to demonstrate a favorable effect after a single injection of ketorolac in patients with chronic postoperative CME; however, edema regression was observed usually some days after the injection.14

Hereby, we present two cases of chronic CME after complicated cataract surgery both patients were treated with consecutive daily intravitreal injections of ketorolac tromethamine (TORADOL® 30 mg/mL, Recordati, Italy). Both cases responded favorably in this modified administration protocol.

Case 1

An 81-year-old female, presented with decreased vision due to postoperative CME in the right eye. She had a history of complicated cataract surgery (posterior capsular rupture, anterior vitrectomy, and anterior segment intraocular lens insertion) 3 years before presentation. CME was diagnosed 7 months after the operation and showed no response to topical treatment (NSAID [ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% coll, qid] and corticosteroid drops [dexamethasone 0.3% coll, qid] for 6 months). No other ocular disease that predispose to the appearance of CME coexisted preoperatively. The patient was lost in follow-up with the persisting chronic CME, without any further ophthalmological consultation, to our knowledge. At presentation (3 years after the operation), the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/125 and the CME was detectable at biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT; Stratus OCT©, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA; Retinal camera TRC-50DX©, Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) (Figure 1A). After institutional approval was obtained from the University of Crete as well as written informed consent was signed, the patient received four consecutive intravitreal injections of ketorolac tromethamine (500 μg/0.05 mL per injection, one injection per day).

Figure 1

Case 1. (A) OCT and late phase FFA at B/L, before the first intravitreal injection of ketorolac tromethamine. (B) OCT 14 days post the fourth injection. (C) OCT and late phase FFA 30 days post the fourth injection. (D) OCT and late-phase FFA 6 months post the fourth injection.

Abbreviations: B/L, Baseline; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Complete ophthalmologic examination and OCT scans were performed at baseline (B/L), before every injection and at every follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks, 3, and 6 months after the last injection. Macular thickness was calculated, by the OCT scans, as the average retinal thickness of the nine Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study foveal map subfields and is reported as mean macular thickness (MMT). An FFA was performed at B/L, 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection.

At B/L, the CDVA was 20/125, the intraocular pressure (IOP) was 14 mmHg, and the MMT at OCT was 550 μm. At 2 weeks, the CDVA was 20/65, the IOP was 13 mmHg, and the MMT was 278 μm (Figure 1B). At 1 month, the CDVA was 20/50, the IOP was 14 mmHg, and the MMT was 200 μm, and the CME was significantly reduced in the FFA (Figure 1C). At 6 months, the CDVA was 20/30, the IOP was 13 mmHg, the MMT was 170 μm, while the CME remained significantly reduced in the FFA (Figure 1D).

Case 2

A 65-year-old female presented with decreased vision and chronic postoperative CME. She had a history of complicated cataract surgery in her right eye (posterior capsular rupture, posterior champer intraocular lens in the sulcus) 17 months before presentation. At the time, she had received a 4-month course with topical anti-inflammatory treatment, commencing with the CME diagnosis (2 weeks after the operation), but without success. The treatment included corticosteroid drops (dexamethasone 0.3% coll, 1 drop every 2 hours with weekly tapering), and an NSAID agent (ketorolac tromethamine coll 0.4%, qid). Meanwhile, the patient remained under observation, without any further anti-inflammatory treatment, until the time of presentation.

At presentation, the CDVA in the right eye was 20/65 and apart from the CME, minor retinal pigment epithelium changes at the macular area (mild age-related macular degeneration [AMD] according to the AREDS I study) were observed. No ocular disease that predispose for the appearance of CME coexisted preoperatively. The CME was detected in the OCT (Stratus OCT©, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and the MMT was calculated as described in the previous case and was found to be 545 μm (Figure 2A). FFA confirmed the diagnosis (Retinal camera TRC-50DX©, Topcon Corp.).

Figure 2

Case 2. (A) OCT and late-phase FFA at B/L, before the first intravitreal injection of ketorolac tromethamine. (B) OCT 14 days post the fourth injection. (C) OCT and late-phase FFA 30 days post the fourth injection. (D) OCT 90 days post fourth injection and late-phase FFA 90 days post the fourth injection. (E) OCT and late-phase FFA 6 months post the fourth injection.

Abbreviations: B/L, Baseline; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

After institutional approval was obtained and informed consent was signed, the patient received four consecutive intravitreal injections of ketorolac tromethamine, 500 μg/0.05 mL per injection, one injection per day.

Complete ophthalmologic examination and OCT scans were performed at B/L visit and at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks, 3, and 6 months visits, after the last injection. An FFA was performed at B/L, 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection.

At B/L, the CDVA was 20/65, the IOP was 12 mmHg, and the MMT in OCT was 540 μm (Figure 2A). At 2 weeks, the CDVA was 20/40, the IOP was 13 mmHg, and the MMT was 351 μm (Figure 2B). At the first month’s visit, the CDVA was 20/30, the IOP was 11 mmHg, the MMT in OCT was reduced to 347 μm, and the leakage in FFA was relatively reduced (Figure 2C). At 3 months, the CDVA was 20/30, the IOP was 12 mmHg, the MMT in OCT was 300 μm, and the leakage in FFA was significantly reduced (Figure 2D). At 6 months, the CDVA was further improved to 20/20−2, the IOP was 12 mmHg, the MMT in OCT was normalized to 250 μm, and the leakage in FFA was significantly reduced (Figure 2E).

Discussion

Both patients presented here had long-lasting chronic CME after complicated cataract surgery that responded to the administration of intravitreal ketorolac tromethamine. In both cases, the edema subsided for at least 6 months after treatment. No complications such as IOP increase, retinal detachment, or endophthalmitis were observed.

Till today, there is no gold standard treatment for postoperative CME. Topical NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or their combinations are applied in uneventful and complicated cases.15 Intravitreal corticosteroids are preferred for complicated CME cases, but their side effects (IOP increase) limit their use.

During the last years, the intravitreal use of NSAIDs for the treatment of macular edema has received significant attention. Ketorolac tromethamine was the first NSAID delivered intravitreally in patients with macular edema of various etiologies with no topical or systemic complications.6 Since then, several NSAIDs (ketorolac, diclofenac) have been tested intravitreally for such entities as uveitic CME,7,8 DME4,6,9,10 as well as choroidal neovascularization.16 Interestingly, in some cases their therapeutic results are comparable with triamcinolone (eg, in DME).17,18 The use of intravitreal NSAIDs in postoperative CME, however, is reported scarcely.4,5

Our cases were chronic CME cases that exhibited regression as well as a significant increase in the visual acuity, shortly after four consecutive injections of 500 μg/0.05 mL of ketorolac tromethamine (1–2 weeks). At the end of the 6 months follow-up, both patients had improved VA (20/30 and 20/20−2).

Intravitreal ketorolac has a safe retinal toxicity profile13 even in high dosage.11,12 Histological evaluation after intravitreal administration of the commercially available ketorolac did not reveal any toxic effect at the retinal level.11,12 Moreover, clinical use of a dose higher than the one used in our patients (3 mg compared to 2 mg) was found to be safe without any sign of toxicity.

In the present work, we have chosen to administrate ketorolac due to the well-established kinetic and toxicity data that already exist in the literature, as mentioned earlier. Moreover, in the past we were able to demonstrate some effect after a single injection of ketorolac in patients with chronic postoperative CME.14 These results were in line with the hypothesis that the pathophysiologic mechanism of postoperative CME lies mainly on the prostaglandins’ pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism and as such is expected to respond to COX-inhibitors. Ketorolac is a small molecule (molecular weight: 255 Da) and its clearance from the vitreous cavity is very short (half-life ~3 hours after intravitreal administration in rabbits). We speculated that this could be the reason for the short duration of the effect that we had observed after the administration of a single injection in the past.12 In the patients presented here, we adopted a therapeutic scheme of four consecutive daily injections in an effort to extend the presence of the drug in the vitreous cavity and thus maximize its therapeutic effect. The dosage was four injections of 500 μg/day. Both patients showed decrease of the edema after 1–2 weeks and regression after 1 month follow-up, without recurrence at 6 months. A possible explanation for the latent effect of the molecule might be related with the kinetics of the substance within the ocular tissues. While published studies related to clearance of ketorolac from the vitreous cavity are available, its bioavailability in the retina and the rest ocular tissues is substantially unknown. The delay of the metabolism of the anti-inflammatory agent and its metabolites within the retina and retinal pigment epithelium could give a potential explanation to our findings and demands further research.

Based on the findings of this work, we think that prolongation of the presence of ketorolac in the vitreous cavity can lead to considerable augmentation of its therapeutic action. In its current pharmacotechnical form, multiple daily injections are necessary to extend its presence in the target tissues. The development of an extended release formulation of ketorolac or some other NSAID may present a very appealing solution for this limitation.

Conclusion

We presented here a favorable effect of intravitreal ketorolac in two patients with chronic post-cataract CME using an intensified scheme of four daily injections. Our findings are promising for the possible therapeutic role of intravitreal NSAIDs in complicated chronic CME cases persistent to conventional treatment. The development of long-acting NSAIDs formulations for intravitreal administration may have the potential to augment the therapeutic effect of these drugs for inflammatory macular edema.