Literature DB >> 2692962

A multicentred phase III comparative study of two hormonal contraceptive preparations given once-a-month by intramuscular injection. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns. World Health Organization Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation.

.   

Abstract

A multicentred Phase III clinical trial was conducted in 12 countries to compare HRP112 (depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, 25 mg and estradiol cypionate, 5 mg) and HRP102 (norethisterone enantate, 50 mg and estradiol valerate, 5 mg) given every 28 days. Contraceptive efficacy and side-effects of both regimens were reported previously. Their effect on vaginal bleeding patterns is the object of this paper. A total of 2320 women were randomly assigned to each drug and 2000 of them provided a menstrual diary. The comparison of the bleeding patterns is made using a 90-day reference period approach and following the guidelines published by WHO. The analysis failed to identify any major difference in the vaginal bleeding patterns induced by both contraceptive preparations. For both drugs, the first bleeding episode following the first injection occurs early. For 70% of users, this is followed by a regular vaginal bleeding pattern similar to an untreated pattern. Others experience irregular bleeding and a few have either infrequent or frequent bleeding. The extremes of amenorrhea and prolonged bleeding are rare. There are no major trends in vaginal bleeding patterns with prolonged use of either preparation. Women with the worst vaginal bleeding patterns discontinue early in the clinical trial and the last three months of experience have the most influence in their decision to stop using the contraceptive method. The analysis suggests how the life-table analysis of discontinuation reasons underestimates the true incidence of vaginal bleeding irregularities in a clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2692962     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90126-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Eleanor A Drey; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Combination injectable contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  A prospective, open-label, single arm, multicentre study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of pericoital oral contraception using levonorgestrel 1.5 mg.

Authors:  Mario P R Festin; Luis Bahamondes; Thi My Huong Nguyen; Ndema Habib; Manopchai Thamkhantho; Kuldip Singh; Arundhati Gosavi; Gyorgy Bartfai; Tamas Bito; M Valeria Bahamondes; Nathalie Kapp
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.