Literature DB >> 2692961

Barrier methods of contraception and the risk of cervical neoplasia.

F Parazzini1, E Negri, C La Vecchia, L Fedele.   

Abstract

The relationship between the use of barrier contraception methods and the risk of cervical neoplasia was analyzed using data from a case-control study conducted in the greater Milan area, northern Italy. A total of 367 cases of invasive cancer under 60 years of age were compared with 323 subjects in hospital for acute conditions unrelated to any of the established or suspected risk factors for cervical cancer, and 316 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were compared with 258 outpatient controls. Ever-use of barrier methods (condom and diaphragm) was reported by 6% of the cases of invasive cancer and 12% of hospital controls. Corresponding values for intraepithelial neoplasia were 16% for cases and 22% for outpatient controls. Considering the total use of barrier methods, compared to never use, the relative risk of invasive cervical cancer was 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9) and decreased with duration of use (chi 2(1), trend = 5.18, p = 0.02). Likewise, use of barrier methods lowered the risk of intraepithelial neoplasia; the estimated relative risks were 0.9 in users for less than two years and 0.6 for two or more (chi 2(1), trend = 4.61, p = 0.03). Although the protection for invasive cancer appeared to be greater at older ages and in multiparous women, the relative risks were not significantly heterogeneous in various strata of parity, number of sexual partners, oral contraceptive use and history of Pap smears.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Barrier Methods; Biology; Cancer; Cervical Cancer; Comparative Studies; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Correlation Studies; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Europe; Family Planning; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Italy; Mediterranean Countries; Neoplasms; Parity; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Southern Europe; Statistical Studies; Studies; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginal Diaphragm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2692961     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90125-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

1.  Condom and oral contraceptive use and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Australian women.

Authors:  Hui Jun Chih; Andy H Lee; Linda Colville; Daniel Xu; Colin W Binns
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer--further findings from the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study.

Authors:  K T Zondervan; L M Carpenter; R Painter; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.