| Literature DB >> 26929604 |
Zhengrong Mao1, Haifeng Wang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of Xuanbai Chengqi decoction on lung compliance for patients with exogenous pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients with exogenous pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome, who were admitted to the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2009 to February 2013, were selected. They were randomly divided into the treatment group (25 cases) and the control group (28 cases). Both the groups were treated with conventional treatment and lung-protective ventilation strategy; apart from these, enema therapy with Xuanbai Chengqi decoction was given to the treatment group. Meanwhile, static lung compliance, dynamic lung compliance, peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for patients in both the groups were observed and recorded at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the drug was used. Moreover, variations in the duration of parenteral nutrition, incidence rate of complications, and case fatality rate in patients after treatment were recorded.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic lung compliance; enema; exogenous pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome; parenteral nutrition duration; static lung compliance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26929604 PMCID: PMC4767063 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S93165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Comparisons of blood gas analysis, respiratory mechanics parameters, and pathogenesis of patients enrolled in the two groups (mean ± standard deviation)
| Items | Treatment group (n=25) | Control group (n=28) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.5±14.6 | 58.8±16.8 |
| APACHE II score | 18.8±4.8 | 19.2±4.2 |
| PaO2/FiO2 | 148±47 | 150±8 |
| Vt (mL/kg) | 6.9±0.6 | 6.6±1.3 |
| Plateau pressure (cm H2O) | 27.61±4.5 | 26.63±5.7 |
| Peak airway pressure (cm H2O) | 37.62±6.5 | 36.53±7.4 |
| PEEP (cm H2O) | 12.6±3.7 | 12.5±3.5 |
Abbreviations: APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; FiO2, fraction of inspired O2; PaO2, arterial oxygen pressure; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; Vt, tidal volume.
Comparisons of relevant indexes of mechanical ventilation for patients in two groups before and after treatment (mean ± standard deviation)
| Groups | Time | Cases | Static lung compliance (mL/cm H2O) | Dynamic lung compliance (mL/cm H2O) | Plateau pressure (mmHg) | Peak airway pressure (mmHg) | PEEP (cm H2O) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Before treatment | 25 | 23.46±6.5 | 22.71±5.7 | 26.61±4.5 | 35.62±6.5 | 10.6±3.7 |
| 24 h after treatment | 25 | 25.29±4.7 | 24.53±4.5 | 23.18±5.4 | 33.58±5.1 | 8.7±3.6 | |
| 48 h after treatment | 25 | 29.66±6.3 | 28.87±5.1 | 21.89±4.3 | 30.47±5.4 | 6.8±3.1 | |
| 72 h after treatment | 25 | 32.71±5.8 | 31.36±4.2 | 20.69±4.9 | 28.78±5.0 | 4.5±2.3 | |
| Control group | Before treatment | 28 | 22.87±7.1 | 22.82±4.8 | 25.83±5.7 | 34.53±7.4 | 10.5±3.5 |
| 24 h after treatment | 28 | 24.18±5.2 | 23.68±5.1 | 24.64±4.6 | 33.82±4.3 | 8.9±3.2 | |
| 48 h after treatment | 28 | 26.29±5.1 | 25.14±5.2 | 23.49±4.8 | 32.71±5.0 | 7.8±2.7 | |
| 72 h after treatment | 28 | 28.38±4.8 | 26.41±3.6 | 22.82±4.1 | 31.66±3.6 | 7.1±2.1 |
Notes: Comparing the same time points in the control group,
P<0.05; comparing with the same group before treatment,
P<0.05.
Abbreviations: PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; h, hours.
Comparisons of the days of abdominal distension and parenteral nutrition for patients in the two groups (mean ± standard deviation)
| Groups | Cases | Parenteral nutrition, days |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 25 | 2.2±1.2 |
| Control group | 28 | 4.3±2.1 |
Note: Comparing with the control group,
P<0.05.
Comparisons of mechanical ventilation complication and fatality for patients in the two groups (cases [%])
| Groups | Cases | Abdominal distension | Ventilator-associated pneumonia | Fatality in 28 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 25 | 3 (12) | 8 (32) | 5 (20) |
| Control group | 28 | 19 (67.8) | 16 (57.1) | 12 (42.8) |
Note: Comparing with the control group,
P<0.05.