Literature DB >> 26929270

Importance of selection and duration of antibiotic regimen in prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention.

Eduard Tornero1, Laura Morata2, Juan C Martínez-Pastor3, Silvia Angulo3, Andreu Combalia3, Guillem Bori3, Sebastián García-Ramiro3, Jordi Bosch4, Josep Mensa2, Alex Soriano2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are managed with debridement, implant retention and antibiotics (DAIR). Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for failure after stopping antibiotic treatment.
METHODS: From 1999 to 2013, early PJIs managed with DAIR were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The main variables potentially associated with outcome were gathered, and the minimum follow-up was 2 years. For the present study, only patients who were in remission after one debridement and without long-term antibiotic suppression were included. The primary endpoint was implant removal or the need to reintroduce antibiotic treatment due to failure.
RESULTS: One-hundred-and-forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The failure rate after a median duration of oral antibiotic treatment of 69 days (IQR 45-95 days) was 11.8%. In 92 cases, PJI was due to Gram-positive microorganisms, in 21 cases PJI was due to Gram-negative microorganisms and in 30 cases PJI was due to a polymicrobial infection with both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. In Gram-positive infections, rifampicin administered in combination with linezolid, co-trimoxazole or clindamycin was associated with a higher failure rate (27.8%, P = 0.026) than that in patients receiving a combination of rifampicin with levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin (8.3%) or monotherapy with linezolid or co-trimoxazole (0%). Among patients with a Gram-negative infection, the use of fluoroquinolones was associated with a lower failure rate (7.1% versus 37.5%, P = 0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: The only factor associated with failure was the oral antibiotic selection, not the duration of treatment. Linezolid, co-trimoxazole and clindamycin, but not levofloxacin, serum concentrations are reduced by rifampicin; a fact that could explain our findings. Further studies monitoring serum concentration could help to improve the efficacy of these antibiotics when administered in combination with rifampicin.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929270     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  23 in total

1.  Exploring the pharmacodynamic interactions between tedizolid and other orally bioavailable antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Brian J Werth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  CORR Insights®: Late Reinfection May Recur More Than 5 Years After Reimplantation of THA and TKA: Analysis of Pathogen Factors.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Evidence of anti-infection strategies in trauma surgery].

Authors:  G Walter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Prolonged Use of Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections.

Authors:  L Morata; J Cobo; M Fernández-Sampedro; P Guisado Vasco; E Ruano; J Lora-Tamayo; M Sánchez Somolinos; P González Ruano; A Rico Nieto; A Arnaiz; M Estébanez Muñoz; M E Jiménez-Mejías; A B Lozano Serrano; E Múñez; D Rodriguez-Pardo; R Argelich; A Arroyo; J M Barbero; F Cuadra; A Del Arco; M D Del Toro; L Guio; D Jimenez-Beatty; N Lois; O Martin; R M Martínez Alvarez; F J Martinez-Marcos; L Porras; M Ramírez; J Vergas García; A Soriano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Epidemiology and microbiology of prosthetic joint infections: a nine-year, single-center experience in Pavia, Northern Italy.

Authors:  M Mussa; T Manciulli; M Corbella; B Mariani; P Cambieri; N Gipsz; L Scudeller; D M Abbott; E Brunetti; M Mosconi; F Benazzo; P Orsolini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 6.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  State-of-the-art diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pablo A Slullitel; José I Oñativia; Martin A Buttaro; Marisa L Sánchez; Fernando Comba; Gerardo Zanotti; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-07-17

8.  Evaluation One Year after DAIR Treatment in 91 Suspected Early Prosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anouk M E Jacobs; Lucia J J Valkering; Menno Bénard; Jacques F Meis; Jon H M Goosen
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 9.  Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Debridement, Antibiotics and Irrigation with Implant Retention - a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ricardo Sousa; Miguel Araújo Abreu
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Linezolid versus daptomycin treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masahiro Sawada; Kenichi Oe; Masayuki Hirata; Hiroshi Kawamura; Narumi Ueda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Hirokazu Iida; Takanori Saito
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.