Literature DB >> 26929199

Phosphorylation-Dependent Regulation of the DNA Damage Response of Adaptor Protein KIBRA in Cancer Cells.

Jayadev Mavuluri1, Swarnalatha Beesetti1, Rohan Surabhi2, Joachim Kremerskothen3, Ganesh Venkatraman4, Suresh K Rayala5.   

Abstract

Multifunctional adaptor proteins encompassing various protein-protein interaction domains play a central role in the DNA damage response pathway. In this report, we show that KIBRA is a physiologically interacting reversible substrate of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. We identified the site of phosphorylation in KIBRA as threonine 1006, which is embedded within the serine/threonine (S/T) Q consensus motif, by site-directed mutagenesis, and we further confirmed the same with a phospho-(S/T) Q motif-specific antibody. Results from DNA repair functional assays such as the γ-H2AX assay, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Comet assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and clonogenic cell survival assay using stable overexpression clones of wild-type (wt.) KIBRA and active (T1006E) and inactive (T1006A) KIBRA phosphorylation mutants showed that T1006 phosphorylation on KIBRA is essential for optimal DNA double-strand break repair in cancer cells. Further, results from stable retroviral short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown (KD) clones of KIBRA and KIBRA knockout (KO) model cells generated by a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 system showed that depleting KIBRA levels compromised the DNA repair functions in cancer cells upon inducing DNA damage. All these phenotypic events were reversed upon reconstitution of KIBRA into cells lacking KIBRA knock-in (KI) model cells. All these results point to the fact that phosphorylated KIBRA might be functioning as a scaffolding protein/adaptor protein facilitating the platform for further recruitment of other DNA damage response factors. In summary, these data demonstrate the imperative functional role of KIBRAper se(KIBRA phosphorylation at T1006 site as a molecular switch that regulates the DNA damage response, possibly via the nonhomologous end joining [NHEJ] pathway), suggesting that KIBRA could be a potential therapeutic target for modulating chemoresistance in cancer cells.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929199      PMCID: PMC4836221          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01004-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  35 in total

1.  Characterization of KIBRA, a novel WW domain-containing protein.

Authors:  Joachim Kremerskothen; Christian Plaas; Katrin Büther; Indra Finger; Stefan Veltel; Theodoros Matanis; Thomas Liedtke; Angelika Barnekow
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  KIBRA modulates directional migration of podocytes.

Authors:  Kerstin Duning; Eva-Maria Schurek; Marc Schlüter; Michael Bayer; Hans-Christian Reinhardt; Albrecht Schwab; Liliana Schaefer; Thomas Benzing; Bernhard Schermer; Moin A Saleem; Tobias B Huber; Sebastian Bachmann; Joachim Kremerskothen; Thomas Weide; Hermann Pavenstädt
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  D Cortez; Y Wang; J Qin; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Activation of p53 transcriptional activity requires ATM's kinase domain and multiple N-terminal serine residues of p53.

Authors:  G A Turenne; P Paul; L Laflair; B D Price
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; G Rotman; A Ogawa; Y Shiloh; K Tamai; S J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Arkady Celeste; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Michael J Kruhlak; Duane R Pilch; David W Staudt; Alicia Lee; Robert F Bonner; William M Bonner; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Kibra functions as a tumor suppressor protein that regulates Hippo signaling in conjunction with Merlin and Expanded.

Authors:  Jianzhong Yu; Yonggang Zheng; Jixin Dong; Stephen Klusza; Wu-Min Deng; Duojia Pan
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  KIBRA: A New Gateway to Learning and Memory?

Authors:  Armin Schneider; Matthew J Huentelman; Joachim Kremerskothen; Kerstin Duning; Robert Spoelgen; Karoly Nikolich
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Phosphorylation of KIBRA by the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) cascade modulates cell proliferation and migration.

Authors:  Shuping Yang; Ming Ji; Lin Zhang; Yuanhong Chen; Dirk Oliver Wennmann; Joachim Kremerskothen; Jixin Dong
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 10.  Therapeutic opportunities within the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Laurence H Pearl; Amanda C Schierz; Simon E Ward; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Frances M G Pearl
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Regulatory Role of KIBRA and PTPN14 in Hippo Signaling and Beyond.

Authors:  Kayla E Wilson; Nuo Yang; Ashley L Mussell; Jianmin Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  KIBRA attains oncogenic activity by repressing RASSF1A.

Authors:  Lakshmi Arivazhagan; Rohan Prasad Surabhi; Archana Kanakarajan; Sandhya Sundaram; Ravi Shankar Pitani; Lakmini Mudduwa; Joachim Kremerskothen; Ganesh Venkatraman; Suresh K Rayala
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  KIBRA; a novel biomarker predicting recurrence free survival of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Lakmini Mudduwa; Harshini Peiris; Shania Gunasekara; Deepthika Abeysiriwardhana; Nimsha Liyanage; Suresh K Rayala; Thusharie Liyanage
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Exosomes impact survival to radiation exposure in cell line models of nervous system cancer.

Authors:  Oliver D Mrowczynski; Achuthamangalam B Madhankumar; Jeffrey M Sundstrom; Yuanjun Zhao; Yuka Imamura Kawasawa; Becky Slagle-Webb; Christine Mau; Russell A Payne; Elias B Rizk; Brad E Zacharia; James R Connor
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-11-16

5.  Identifying and analyzing different cancer subtypes using RNA-seq data of blood platelets.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Zhang; Tao Huang; Lei Chen; YaoChen Xu; Yu Hu; Lan-Dian Hu; Yudong Cai; Xiangyin Kong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 6.  The Hippo Signaling Pathway in Cancer: A Cell Cycle Perspective.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Jixin Dong
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.