Literature DB >> 26929149

Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes.

Rodney A Green1, Laura Y Whitburn2.   

Abstract

Blended learning has become increasingly common, in a variety of disciplines, to take advantage of new technology and potentially increase the efficiency and flexibility of delivery. This study aimed to describe blended delivery of a gross anatomy course and to evaluate the effectiveness of the delivery in terms of student outcomes. A gross anatomy course for second-year physiotherapy students across two campuses was delivered in traditional face-to-face teaching mode in 2013 (n = 150 students), some online content was introduced in 2014 (n = 160) and the subject was fully blended in 2015 (n = 151). The final 'blend' consisted of one lecture per week with most content delivered using online video resources (prepared by staff using a structured peer-reviewed process) and retention of face-to-face practical classes. Outcomes evaluated included student grades, student engagement with content through online discussion forums and student feedback using both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Grades were higher in 2014 and 2015 than in 2013 (P < 0.01). There were no differences in student engagement with online discussion forums. Student feedback identified some negative comments and lower levels of intellectual stimulation (P < 0.05) with the initial introduction of online content in 2014. The fully blended version in 2015 resulted in more balanced comments about online content but higher perceived workload (P < 0.05). All cohorts listed practical classes as a major factor contributing to learning. Blended learning appears to be well-suited to gross anatomy teaching on the proviso that face-to-face practical classes are maintained, but may result in higher perceived workloads. Anat Sci Educ 9: 422-430.
© 2016 American Association of Anatomists. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  blended learning; discussion forums; gross anatomy education; student feedback; student grades; students' performance; undergraduate education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929149     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  10 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Medical Students' Experiences and Satisfaction with Blended Integrated E-Learning.

Authors:  Shashidhar Venkatesh; Yeshwanth K Rao; Haleagrahara Nagaraja; Torres Woolley; Faith O Alele; Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  A survey study on distance anatomy education: challenges unique to anatomy.

Authors:  Abdullah Ortadeveci; Merve Nur Ermez; Semih Oz; Hilmi Ozden
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  An Adaptive Blended Learning Model for the Implementation of an Integrated Medical Neuroscience Course During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Thomas I Nathaniel; Richard L Goodwin; Lauren Fowler; Brooks McPhail; Asa C Black
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 6.652

4.  Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Georga J Longhurst; Danya M Stone; Kate Dulohery; Deirdre Scully; Thomas Campbell; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Opinions of South African physiotherapists on gross anatomy education for physiotherapy students.

Authors:  Dorothy Shead; Ronel Roos; Benita Olivier; Amadi O Ihunwo
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2019-07-30

6.  Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nalini Pather; Phil Blyth; Jamie A Chapman; Manisha R Dayal; Natasha A M S Flack; Quentin A Fogg; Rodney A Green; Anneliese K Hulme; Ian P Johnson; Amanda J Meyer; John W Morley; Peter J Shortland; Goran Štrkalj; Mirjana Štrkalj; Krisztina Valter; Alexandra L Webb; Stephanie J Woodley; Michelle D Lazarus
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina Bjerketveit Ødegaard; Hilde Tinderholt Myrhaug; Tone Dahl-Michelsen; Yngve Røe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Assessment of the effectiveness of BOPPPS-based hybrid teaching model in physiology education.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Liu; Chunmei Lu; Hui Zhu; Xiaoran Wang; Shuwei Jia; Ying Zhang; Haixia Wen; Yu-Feng Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Learning anatomy before and during COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perceptions and exam performance.

Authors:  B K Potu; H Atwa; W A Nasr El-Din; M A Othman; N A Sarwani; A Fatima; A Deifalla; R A Fadel
Journal:  Morphologie       Date:  2021-07-29

10.  Responding to Covid-19: A thematic analysis of students' perspectives on modified learning activities during an emergency transition to remote human anatomy education.

Authors:  Sean C McWatt
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 5.958

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.