Literature DB >> 26929108

The utility of pulmonary function testing in predicting outcomes following liver transplantation.

Leila Kia1, Michael J Cuttica2, Amy Yang3, Erica N Donnan4, Maureen Whitsett4, Ajay Singhvi4, Alexander Lemmer4, Josh Levitsky1,5.   

Abstract

Although pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are routinely performed in patients during the evaluation period before liver transplantation (LT), their utility in predicting post-LT mortality and morbidity outcomes is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of obstructive and/or restrictive lung disease on post-LT outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had pre-LT PFTs and underwent a subsequent LT (2007-2013). We used statistical analyses to determine independent associations between PFT parameters and outcomes (graft/patient survival, time on ventilator, and hospital/intensive care unit [ICU] length of stay [LOS]). A total of 415 LT recipients with available PFT data were included: 65% of patients had normal PFTs; 8% had obstructive lung disease; and 27% had restrictive lung disease. There was no difference in patient and graft survival between patients with normal, obstructive, and restrictive lung disease. However, restrictive lung disease was associated with longer post-LT time on ventilator and both ICU and hospital LOS (P < 0.05). More specific PFT parameters (diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, total lung capacity, and residual volume) were all significant predictors of ventilator time and both ICU and hospital LOS (P < 0.05). Although pre-LT PFT parameters may not predict post-LT mortality, restrictive abnormalities correlate with prolonged post-LT ventilation and LOS. Efforts to identify and minimize the impact of restrictive abnormalities on PFTs might improve such outcomes. Liver Transplantation 22 805-811 2016 AASLD.
© 2016 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26929108     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hospice care for end stage liver disease in the United States.

Authors:  Eric S Orman; Amy W Johnson; Marwan Ghabril; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.095

2.  Understanding the Impact of Pneumonia and Other Complications in Elderly Liver Transplant Recipients: An Analysis of NSQIP Transplant.

Authors:  Gabriel T Schnickel; Stuart Greenstein; Jennifer A Berumen; Nahel Elias; Debra L Sudan; Kendra D Conzen; Kristin L Mekeel; David P Foley; Ryutaro Hirose; Justin R Parekh
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Striking the Right Note: Assessing the Recipient for Liver Transplantation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Muhammad Irfan Ul Haq; Malika Hameed; Bruce Duncan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-02

4.  Prevalence and Impact of Restrictive Lung Disease in Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Hilary M DuBrock; Michael J Krowka; Karen Krok; Kimberly Forde; Carl Mottram; Paul Scanlon; Nadine Al-Naamani; Mamta Patel; Amber McCormick; Michael B Fallon; Steven M Kawut
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Tracheostomy Post Liver Transplant: Predictors, Complications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan C Graham; Weston J Bush; Jeffrey S Mella; Jonathan A Fridell; Burcin Ekser; Plamen Mihaylov; Chandrashekhar A Kubal; Richard S Mangus
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 1.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.