Literature DB >> 26928775

Long-Term Follow-Up of Transgender Women After Secondary Intestinal Vaginoplasty.

Wouter B van der Sluis1, Mark-Bram Bouman2, Nanne K H de Boer3, Marlon E Buncamper2, Adriaan A van Bodegraven4, E Andra Neefjes-Borst5, Baudewijntje P C Kreukels6, Wilhelmus J H J Meijerink7, Margriet G Mullender2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intestinal vaginoplasty with a sigmoid colon or ileal segment is an established surgical technique for vaginal reconstruction. Little has been reported on long-term (functional) outcome and postoperative quality of life. AIMS: To assess the surgical and long-term psychological outcomes of secondary intestinal vaginoplasty performed from 1970 through 2000 in transgender women.
METHODS: Transgender women who underwent intestinal vaginoplasty from 1970 through 2000 were identified from our hospital registry. Demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Traceable women were invited to fill out a set of questionnaires (quality-of-life questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index, Amsterdam Hyperactive Pelvic Floor Scale for Women, Female Genital Self-Imaging Scale, and self-evaluation of vaginoplasty questionnaire) and attend the outpatient clinic for physical, endoscopic, and histologic examination of the neovagina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were complications, reoperations, self-perceived quality of life, and functional and esthetic self-evaluation.
RESULTS: Twenty-four transgender women were identified who underwent intestinal vaginoplasty as a secondary procedure from 1970 through 2000. There were no intraoperative complications. Three intestinal neovaginas were surgically removed because of postoperative complications. Nineteen women (79%) underwent at least one genital reoperation, most commonly introitus plasty (n = 13, 54%). Five women were deceased at time of analysis. Nine women consented to partake in the study (median age = 58 years, range = 50-73; median postoperative time = 29.6 years, range = 17.2-34.3). They were generally satisfied with life and scored 5.9 of 7 on a subjective happiness scale. Neovaginal functionality was rated as 7.3 and appearance as 7.4 of 10.
CONCLUSION: In our institution, intestinal vaginoplasty before 2000 was always performed as a revision procedure after a previous vaginoplasty had failed. Although surgical corrections were frequently necessary, women reported satisfaction with the surgical outcome and with life in general.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender Affirming Surgery; Gender Dysphoria; Intestinal Vaginoplasty; Quality of Life; Sex Reassignment Surgery; Surgery; Transgendered Persons; Vaginoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928775     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Gender confirming surgery : Female-to-male and male-to-female].

Authors:  M Sohn; U M Rieger; J Heß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Surgical satisfaction and quality of life outcomes reported by transgender men and women at least one year post gender-affirming surgery: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christienne Javier; Charlie R Crimston; Fiona Kate Barlow
Journal:  Int J Transgend Health       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Gender Dysphoria and Its Non-Surgical and Surgical Treatments.

Authors:  Danyon Anderson; Himasa Wijetunge; Peyton Moore; Daniel Provenzano; Nathan Li; Jamal Hasoon; Omar Viswanath; Alan D Kaye; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 4.  Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  N Nassiri; M Maas; M Basin; G E Cacciamani; L R Doumanian
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  The assessment of sexual wellbeing in treatment-seeking transgender individuals: a systematic review of the medical literature.

Authors:  M Özer; S Poor Toulabi; L Gijs; B P C Kreukels; M G Mullender
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Updates in penile prosthesis infections.

Authors:  Amanda R Swanton; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes in Transfemale Vaginoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samyd S Bustos; Valeria P Bustos; Andres Mascaro; Pedro Ciudad; Antonio J Forte; Gabriel Del Corral; Oscar Javier Manrique
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 8.  ESSM Position Statement "Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery".

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Sahaand Poor Toulabi; Alessandra D Fisher; Guy T'Sjoen; Marlon E Buncamper; Stan Monstrey; Marta R Bizic; Miroslav Djordjevic; Marco Falcone; Nim A Christopher; Daniel Simon; Luis Capitán; Joz Motmans
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 9.  Primary Sigmoid Vaginoplasty in Transwomen: Technique and Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J Salgado; Ajani Nugent; Joseph Kuhn; Meghan Janette; Heidi Bahna
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Masculinizing genital gender-affirming surgery: metoidioplasty and urethral lengthening.

Authors:  Ervin Kocjancic; Omer Acar; Susan Talamini; Loren Schechter
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.