Literature DB >> 26928465

Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): III. Accurate Preoperative Prediction of 8 Adverse Outcomes Using 8 Predictor Variables.

Robert A Meguid1, Michael R Bronsert, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Karl E Hammermeister, William G Henderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop accurate preoperative risk prediction models for multiple adverse postoperative outcomes applicable to a broad surgical population using a parsimonious common set of risk variables and outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, preoperative assessment of surgical risk is largely based on subjective clinician experience. We propose a paradigm shift from the current postoperative risk adjustment for cross-hospital comparison to patient-centered quantitative risk assessment during the preoperative evaluation.
METHODS: We identify the most common and important predictor variables of postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, and 6 complication clusters from previously published prediction analyses that used forward selection stepwise logistic regression. We then refit the prediction models using only the 8 most common and important predictor variables, and compare the discrimination and calibration of these models to the original full-variable models using the c-index, Hosmer-Lemeshow analysis, and Brier scores.
RESULTS: Accurate risk models for 30-day outcomes of mortality, overall morbidity, and 6 clusters of complications were developed using a set of 8 preoperative risk variables. C-indexes of the 8 variable models are between 97.9% and 99.2% of those of the full models containing up to 28 variables, indicating excellent discrimination using fewer predictor variables. Hosmer-Lemeshow analyses showed observed to expected event rates to be nearly identical between parsimonious models and full models, both showing good calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate preoperative risk assessment of postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, and 6 complication clusters in a broad surgical population can be achieved with as few as 8 preoperative predictor variables, improving feasibility of routine preoperative risk assessment for surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928465     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Frailty as a Risk Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality Following Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Marcelo Cerullo; Neda Amini; Stefan Buettner; Georgios A Margonis; Kazunari Sasaki; Yuhree Kim; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Can Machine Learning Methods Produce Accurate and Easy-to-use Prediction Models of 30-day Complications and Mortality After Knee or Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Alfred C Kuo; Yingjie Weng; Amber W Trickey; Thomas Bowe; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The independent effect of cancer on outcomes: a potential limitation of surgical risk prediction.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Joseph K Canner; Jonathan E Efron; Nita Ahuja; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth C Wick; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Implementation of a machine learning application in preoperative risk assessment for hip repair surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Li; Jhi-Joung Wang; Sheng-Han Huang; Chi-Lin Kuo; Jen-Yin Chen; Chung-Feng Liu; Chin-Chen Chu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.376

5.  Use of the consolidated framework for implementation research to guide dissemination and implementation of new technologies in surgery.

Authors:  Anne C Lambert-Kerzner; Davis M Aasen; Douglas M Overbey; Laura J Damschroder; William G Henderson; Karl E Hammermeister; Michael R Bronsert; Robert A Meguid
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Risk Prediction in Clinical Practice: A Practical Guide for Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Amelia Maiga; Farhood Farjah; Jeffrey Blume; Stephen Deppen; Valerie F Welty; Richard S D'Agostino; Graham A Colditz; Benjamin D Kozower; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Performance Comparison Between SURPAS and ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Pulmonary Resection.

Authors:  Neel P Chudgar; Shi Yan; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Katherine D Gray; Daniela Molena; Tamar Nobel; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; James Huang; Bernard J Park; Gaetano Rocco; Valerie W Rusch; Smita Sihag; David R Jones; James M Isbell
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  External Validation of Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System in Pulmonary Resection.

Authors:  Neel P Chudgar; Shi Yan; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Katherine D Gray; Tamar Nobel; Daniela Molena; Smita Sihag; Matthew Bott; David R Jones; Valerie W Rusch; Gaetano Rocco; James M Isbell
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 5.102

Review 9.  Multiobjective optimization challenges in perioperative anesthesia: A review.

Authors:  Meghan Brennan; Jack D Hagan; Chris Giordano; Tyler J Loftus; Catherine E Price; Haldun Aytug; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.348

10.  Clinical utility of the platelet-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy for clinical T2-4 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Inaoka; Mitsuro Kanda; Hiroaki Uda; Yuri Tanaka; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Hideki Takami; Naoki Iwata; Masamichi Hayashi; Yukiko Niwa; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Kenta Murotani; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.