Literature DB >> 26928338

Incidence of and Factors Associated With the Decision to Undergo Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 1 to 10 Years After Injury.

Thomas L Sanders1, Hilal Maradit Kremers2, Andrew J Bryan3, Walter K Kremers4, Bruce A Levy3, Diane L Dahm3, Michael J Stuart3, Aaron J Krych3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients treated nonoperatively for 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption, little is known about the frequency of ACL reconstruction within the first year of injury and the effect of age range, sex, and meniscal tears on the incidence of ACL reconstruction between 1 and 10 years after injury.
PURPOSE: To (1) define the rate of delayed ACL reconstruction (between 1 and 10 years after injury) in a population-based cohort of isolated ACL tears and (2) evaluate predictive factors associated with delayed reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The study included a population-based cohort of 1841 patients with new-onset, isolated ACL tears that occurred between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2010. The complete medical records were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and collect data on clinical characteristics and details of subsequent ACL surgery. To evaluate the incidence of ACL reconstruction between 1 and 10 years after injury, landmark survival analysis was performed with a landmark set at 1 year after injury. Early and late predictors of ACL reconstruction were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: A total of 661 patients were treated nonoperatively for the first year after ACL tears. Over a mean 10 years of follow-up, 213 patients (32%) underwent ACL reconstruction between 1 and 10 years after injury. Young age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 per decade increase in age; 95% CI, 0.48-0.62) and meniscal tear at injury (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.95) were significant predictors of undergoing delayed reconstruction. The rate of delayed ACL reconstruction decreased significantly over the study period (P < .03). There was no association between sex (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16) and delayed ACL reconstruction. Among patients who had delayed ACL reconstruction, 40% experienced a secondary meniscal tear before surgery.
CONCLUSION: In this study population of 1841 patients, 62% of patients received ACL reconstruction within 1 year of injury. Of patients treated nonoperatively for 1 year after ACL tears, 32% underwent delayed ACL reconstruction. Predictors of reconstruction beyond 1 year were young age (50% reduction in reconstruction per decade increased age) and baseline meniscal tear. Sex was not predictive for reconstruction beyond 1 year from injury.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL injury; ACL reconstruction; delayed ACL reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928338     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516630751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  10 in total

1.  The Effects of Injury Prevention Programs on the Biomechanics of Landing Tasks: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thiago Jambo Alves Lopes; Milena Simic; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Intraarticular injection of relaxin-2 alleviates shoulder arthrofibrosis.

Authors:  William A Blessing; Stephen M Okajima; M Belen Cubria; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Patrick M Williamson; Angie N Sabogal; Sebastian Suarez; Lay-Hong Ang; Suzanne White; Evelyn Flynn; Edward K Rodriguez; Mark W Grinstaff; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Low Rates of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis 5 Years After ACL Reconstruction or Rehabilitation Alone: The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marie Pedersen; Hege Grindem; Bjørnar Berg; Ragnhild Gunderson; Lars Engebretsen; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-17

4.  Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation.

Authors:  David Y Ding; Richard N Chang; Sachin Allahabadi; Monica J Coughlan; Heather A Prentice; Gregory B Maletis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament tear without reconstruction: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Konrads; Stephan Reppenhagen; Daniel Belder; Sascha Goebel; Maximilian Rudert; Thomas Barthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  The Prognosis of Arthrofibroses: Prevalence, Clinical Shortcomings, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  William A Blessing; Amanda K Williamson; Jack R Kirsch; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  Clinical, Functional, and Physical Activity Outcomes 5 Years Following the Treatment Algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marie Pedersen; Hege Grindem; Jessica L Johnson; Lars Engebretsen; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.558

8.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury-Who Succeeds Without Reconstructive Surgery? The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Mathew Failla; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-23

9.  Quadriceps Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunnicutt; Chris M Gregory; Michelle M McLeod; Shane K Woolf; Russell W Chapin; Harris S Slone
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-24

10.  Meniscus or Cartilage Injury at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Is Associated With Worse Prognosis for Patient-Reported Outcome 2 to 10 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Pedersen; Jessica L Johnson; Hege Grindem; Karin Magnusson; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.