Literature DB >> 26928255

Multiple classifier systems for automatic sleep scoring in mice.

Vance Gao1, Fred Turek2, Martha Vitaterna2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) recordings are often used in rodents to study sleep architecture and sleep-associated neural activity. These recordings must be scored to designate what sleep/wake state the animal is in at each time point. Manual sleep-scoring is very time-consuming, so machine-learning classifier algorithms have been used to automate scoring. NEW
METHOD: Instead of using single classifiers, we implement a multiple classifier system. The multiple classifier is built from six base classifiers: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, support vector machine, neural net, and linear discriminant analysis. Decision tree and k-nearest neighbors were improved into ensemble classifiers by using bagging and random subspace. Confidence scores from each classifier were combined to determine the final classification. Ambiguous epochs can be rejected and left for a human to classify.
RESULTS: Support vector machine was the most accurate base classifier, and had error rate of 0.054. The multiple classifier system reduced the error rate to 0.049, which was not significantly different from a second human scorer. When 10% of epochs were rejected, the remaining epochs' error rate dropped to 0.018. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Compared with the most accurate single classifier (support vector machine), the multiple classifier reduced errors by 9.4%. The multiple classifier surpassed the accuracy of a second human scorer after rejecting only 2% of epochs.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple classifier systems are an effective way to increase automated sleep scoring accuracy. Improvements in autoscoring will allow sleep researchers to increase sample sizes and recording lengths, opening new experimental possibilities.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoscoring; Electroencephalogram; Machine learning; Mouse; Multiple classifier system; Sleep; Sleep scoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928255      PMCID: PMC4833589          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  13 in total

Review 1.  Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future.

Authors:  Mikhail A Lebedev; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: from brain-computer interfacing to mental state monitoring.

Authors:  Klaus-Robert Müller; Michael Tangermann; Guido Dornhege; Matthias Krauledat; Gabriel Curio; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Automated sleep scoring in rats and mice using the naive Bayes classifier.

Authors:  Kirsi-Marja Rytkönen; Jukka Zitting; Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  EEG gamma frequency and sleep-wake scoring in mice: comparing two types of supervised classifiers.

Authors:  Jurij Brankack; Valeriy I Kukushka; Alexei L Vyssotski; Andreas Draguhn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  A multiple classifier system for early melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Andrea Sboner; Claudio Eccher; Enrico Blanzieri; Paolo Bauer; Mario Cristofolini; Giuseppe Zumiani; Stefano Forti
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Digital computer classifications of EEG sleep stages.

Authors:  T M Itil; D M Shapiro; M Fink; D Kassebaum
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07

7.  Sleep-stage scoring in the rat using a support vector machine.

Authors:  Shelly Crisler; Michael J Morrissey; A Michael Anch; David W Barnett
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Neuronal activity of orexin and non-orexin waking-active neurons during wake-sleep states in the mouse.

Authors:  K Takahashi; J-S Lin; K Sakai
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  FASTER: an unsupervised fully automated sleep staging method for mice.

Authors:  Genshiro A Sunagawa; Hiroyoshi Séi; Shigeki Shimba; Yoshihiro Urade; Hiroki R Ueda
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Uncovering the genetic landscape for multiple sleep-wake traits.

Authors:  Christopher J Winrow; Deanna L Williams; Andrew Kasarskis; Joshua Millstein; Aaron D Laposky; He S Yang; Karrie Mrazek; Lili Zhou; Joseph R Owens; Daniel Radzicki; Fabian Preuss; Eric E Schadt; Kazuhiro Shimomura; Martha H Vitaterna; Chunsheng Zhang; Kenneth S Koblan; John J Renger; Fred W Turek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reconfigurable 3D-Printed headplates for reproducible and rapid implantation of EEG, EMG and depth electrodes in mice.

Authors:  Katherine J Zhu; Lauren M Aiani; Nigel P Pedersen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Supervised and unsupervised machine learning for automated scoring of sleep-wake and cataplexy in a mouse model of narcolepsy.

Authors:  Ioannis Exarchos; Anna A Rogers; Lauren M Aiani; Robert E Gross; Gari D Clifford; Nigel P Pedersen; Jon T Willie
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  A Prebiotic Diet Alters the Fecal Microbiome and Improves Sleep in Response to Sleep Disruption in Rats.

Authors:  Samuel J Bowers; Keith C Summa; Robert S Thompson; Antonio González; Fernando Vargas; Christopher Olker; Peng Jiang; Christopher A Lowry; Pieter C Dorrestein; Rob Knight; Kenneth P Wright; Monika Fleshner; Fred W Turek; Martha H Vitaterna
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Immunization with a heat-killed bacterium, Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659, prevents the development of cortical hyperarousal and a PTSD-like sleep phenotype after sleep disruption and acute stress in mice.

Authors:  Samuel J Bowers; Sophie Lambert; Shannon He; Christopher A Lowry; Monika Fleshner; Kenneth P Wright; Fred W Turek; Martha H Vitaterna
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Distinct ipRGC subpopulations mediate light's acute and circadian effects on body temperature and sleep.

Authors:  Alan C Rupp; Michelle Ren; Cara M Altimus; Diego C Fernandez; Melissa Richardson; Fred Turek; Samer Hattar; Tiffany M Schmidt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Repeated sleep disruption in mice leads to persistent shifts in the fecal microbiome and metabolome.

Authors:  Samuel J Bowers; Fernando Vargas; Antonio González; Shannon He; Peng Jiang; Pieter C Dorrestein; Rob Knight; Kenneth P Wright; Christopher A Lowry; Monika Fleshner; Martha H Vitaterna; Fred W Turek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  NMDAR activation regulates the daily rhythms of sleep and mood.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Burgdorf; Martha H Vitaterna; Christopher J Olker; Eun Joo Song; Edward P Christian; Laurits Sørensen; Fred W Turek; Torsten M Madsen; M Amin Khan; Roger A Kroes; Joseph R Moskal
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Functional Divergence of Mammalian TFAP2a and TFAP2b Transcription Factors for Bidirectional Sleep Control.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Alejandra Korovaichuk; Mariana Astiz; Henning Schroeder; Rezaul Islam; Jon Barrenetxea; Andre Fischer; Henrik Oster; Henrik Bringmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.