Literature DB >> 26928152

Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study.

Erica Ginström Ernstad1, Christina Bergh1, Ali Khatibi1, Karin B M Källén2, Göran Westlander3, Staffan Nilsson4, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a higher risk of birth defects and preterm birth (PTB) in singletons born after blastocyst transfer as compared to singletons born after cleavage-stage transfer. Few studies have investigated the maternal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer (day 5-6) compared to transfer of cleavage-stage embryos (day 2-3) and spontaneous conception. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective registry study including all singleton deliveries after blastocyst transfer in Sweden from 2002 through 2013. The in vitro fertilization register was cross-linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Register of Birth Defects, and the National Patient Register. Deliveries after blastocyst transfer were compared with deliveries after cleavage-stage transfer and deliveries after spontaneous conception. Outcome measures included birth defects, PTB, low birthweight, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, perinatal mortality, placenta previa, placental abruption, and preeclampsia. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Adjustment was made for year of birth of child, maternal age, parity, smoking, body mass index, years of involuntary childlessness, and child's sex and, for cleavage stage, also for number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and fresh/frozen embryo transfer.
RESULTS: There were 4819 singletons born after blastocyst transfer, 25,747 after cleavage-stage transfer, and 1,196,394 after spontaneous conception. Singletons born after blastocyst transfer had no increased risk of birth defects compared to singletons born after cleavage-stage transfer (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13) or spontaneous conception (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92-1.28). Perinatal mortality was higher in the blastocyst vs the cleavage-stage group (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.29). When comparing singletons born after blastocyst transfer to singletons born after spontaneous conception, a higher risk of PTB (<37 weeks) was seen (AOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.31). Singletons born after blastocyst transfer had a lower rate of low birthweight (AOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97) as compared to cleavage-stage transfer. The rate of being small for gestational age was lower in singletons born after blastocyst transfer as compared to both cleavage-stage and spontaneous conception (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88 and AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87, respectively). The risk of placenta previa and placental abruption was higher in pregnancies after blastocyst transfer as compared to pregnancies after cleavage-stage (AOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.70-2.55 and AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15-2.29, respectively) and spontaneous conception (AOR, 6.38; 95% CI, 5.31-7.66 and AOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.70-3.13, respectively).
CONCLUSION: No increased risk of birth defects was found in singletons born after blastocyst transfer. Perinatal mortality and risk of placental complications were higher in the blastocyst group as compared to the cleavage-stage group, observations that need further investigations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technology; birth defects; congenital anomalies; malformations; placenta previa; preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928152     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  22 in total

1.  Birthweight of singletons born after blastocyst-stage or cleavage-stage transfer: analysis of a data set from three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anick De Vos; Samuel Dos Santos-Ribeiro; Herman Tournaye; Greta Verheyen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Child Health: Is It Really Assisted Reproductive Technology that We Need to Be Concerned About?

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Keewan Kim; Alexandra Purdue-Smithe; Griffith Bell; Jessica Zolton; Akhgar Ghassabian; Yassaman Vafai; Sonia L Robinson; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  FIGO good practice recommendations on reduction of preterm birth in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Ben W Mol; Bo Jacobsson; William A Grobman; Kelle Moley
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

4.  Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 6.  Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingling Wang; Mingze Du; Yichun Guan; Bijun Wang; Junwei Zhang; Zihua Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Clinical and neonatal outcomes of patients of different ages following transfer of thawed cleavage embryos and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Qin-Wei Zhou; Shuang Jing; Li Xu; Hui Guo; Chang-Fu Lu; Fei Gong; Guang-Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Yi-Fan Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Perinatal Outcomes Following Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Parimala Chinta; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

9.  Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.

Authors:  Zoha Saket; Karin Källén; Kersti Lundin; Åsa Magnusson; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Identifying a possible factor for the increased newborn size in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology using cryopreserved embryos, in comparison with fresh embryos.

Authors:  Rena Ishii; Akiko Shoda; Michiyo Kubo; Satiko Okazaki; Minori Suzuki; Riho Okawa; Megumi Enomoto; Manami Shitanaka; Yoko Fujita; Kazuki Nakao; Nobutaka Shimada; Michiharu Horikawa; Hiroaki Negishi; Yuji Taketani
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.