Literature DB >> 26927958

Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.

Nathan A Bowling1, Jason L Huang2, Caleb B Bragg3, Steve Khazon4, Mengqiao Liu4, Caitlin E Blackmore4.   

Abstract

Insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys, which occurs when respondents fail to carefully read questionnaire instructions or item content, has recently gained attention as a source of inaccuracy in self-report data (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Maniaci & Rogge, 2014; Meade & Craig, 2012). Whereas previous studies have focused on IER as a methodological nuisance, the current studies examined IER as a substantive variable. Specifically, we hypothesized that IER is a reflection of enduring individual differences. In Study 1, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency over the course of 13 months; in Studies 2 and 3, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency across multiple research situations; in Study 4, we found that acquaintance-reported conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability were each negatively related to IER; and in Study 5, we found that IER was related to college grade point average and class absences. Together, these 5 studies suggest that IER is in part a manifestation of enduring individual differences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26927958     DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  9 in total

1.  Can intelligent agents improve data quality in online questiosnnaires? A pilot study.

Authors:  Arne Söderström; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-05

2.  Quality of Survey Responses at Older Ages Predicts Cognitive Decline and Mortality Risk.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Erik Meijer; Elizabeth M Zelinski; Haomiao Jin; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Marcella May; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.

Authors:  Esther Ulitzsch; Steffi Pohl; Lale Khorramdel; Ulf Kroehne; Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 5.  Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Melissa G Keith; Louis Tay; Peter D Harms
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  The Relationship of Insufficient Effort Responding and Response Styles: An Online Experiment.

Authors:  Gene M Alarcon; Michael A Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-12

7.  Zero party data between hype and hope.

Authors:  Andrea Polonioli
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-08-30

8.  Development of the short Creative Expression Interest Scale based on item response theory.

Authors:  Peng Juan Zhao; Xu Liang Gao; Nan Zhao; Zhao Sheng Luo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-22

9.  Empirical Tryout of a New Statistic for Detecting Temporally Inconsistent Responders.

Authors:  Matthew J Kerry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.