Keith M Kerr1, Marianne C Nicolson. 1. From the Department of Pathology, Aberdeen University School of Medicine (Dr Kerr), and the Department of Oncology (Dr Nicolson), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although most primary cancers of the lung carry a heavy mutational load and will potentially present many "nonself" antigens to the immune system, there are a wide range of possible mechanisms for tumors to avoid so-called immune surveillance. One such mechanism is the adoption of immune checkpoints to inhibit the host immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors show great promise in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the possibility of biomarker selection of patients for these therapies. This is becoming a much debated issue, and the immunohistochemical detection of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1), the ligand for the inhibitory Programmed Death receptor 1 (PD-1) checkpoint, is one possible biomarker. Data so far available show some conflicting results, but PD-L1 immunohistochemistry looks likely to be introduced into clinical use for selecting patients for treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapies. Given that there are 4 such drugs rapidly approaching regulatory approval, each with its own independent PD-L1 immunohistochemistry biomarker test, both oncologists and pathologists face some significant challenges. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed literature and meeting proceedings, especially during the last 12 months, were used. CONCLUSIONS: The biology of PD-1/PD-L1 is complex, the clinical data for these drugs show considerable variation, the selection performance of the PD-L1 biomarker test is not perfect, and the existence of 4 drug/test combinations adds significantly to the problems faced. This article addresses some of the background to this therapeutic problem and discusses some of the issues ahead.
CONTEXT: Although most primary cancers of the lung carry a heavy mutational load and will potentially present many "nonself" antigens to the immune system, there are a wide range of possible mechanisms for tumors to avoid so-called immune surveillance. One such mechanism is the adoption of immune checkpoints to inhibit the host immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors show great promise in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the possibility of biomarker selection of patients for these therapies. This is becoming a much debated issue, and the immunohistochemical detection of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1), the ligand for the inhibitory Programmed Death receptor 1 (PD-1) checkpoint, is one possible biomarker. Data so far available show some conflicting results, but PD-L1 immunohistochemistry looks likely to be introduced into clinical use for selecting patients for treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapies. Given that there are 4 such drugs rapidly approaching regulatory approval, each with its own independent PD-L1 immunohistochemistry biomarker test, both oncologists and pathologists face some significant challenges. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed literature and meeting proceedings, especially during the last 12 months, were used. CONCLUSIONS: The biology of PD-1/PD-L1 is complex, the clinical data for these drugs show considerable variation, the selection performance of the PD-L1 biomarker test is not perfect, and the existence of 4 drug/test combinations adds significantly to the problems faced. This article addresses some of the background to this therapeutic problem and discusses some of the issues ahead.
Authors: Emily B Tsai; Kelsey Pomykala; Kathleen Ruchalski; Scott Genshaft; Fereidoun Abtin; Antonio Gutierrez; Hyun J Kim; Alice Li; Carlos Adame; Ashkan Jalalian; Brian Wolf; Edward B Garon; Jonathan W Goldman; Robert Suh Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lívia Rojkó; Lilla Reiniger; Vanda Téglási; Katalin Fábián; Orsolya Pipek; Attila Vágvölgyi; László Agócs; János Fillinger; Zita Kajdácsi; József Tímár; Balázs Döme; Zoltán Szállási; Judit Moldvay Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Manuel D Keller; Christina Neppl; Yasin Irmak; Sean R Hall; Ralph A Schmid; Rupert Langer; Sabina Berezowska Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 7.842