Literature DB >> 26927430

Distal biceps tendon repair: comparison of clinical and radiological outcome between bioabsorbable and nonabsorbable screws.

Pieter Caekebeke1, Kristoff Corten2, Joris Duerinckx2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon repair to the radial tuberosity can be conducted by means of an interference screw in combination with a transosseous button. Bioabsorbable interference screws have been associated with complications such as severe osteolytic reactions. We questioned whether patients with a distal biceps tendon repair with bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) screws had different functional, clinical, and radiologic outcome than patients with nonabsorbable poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) screws.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 23 patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture were treated with reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon in a bone tunnel at the radial tuberosity through a single anterior incision using a transosseous button combined with an interference screw. A PLLA screw was used in 12 patients and a PEEK screw in 11 patients. All patients were retrospectively evaluated with a minimal follow-up of 1 year clinically and by means of the visual analog scale for pain, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure score. Bone tunnel volume was measured with computed tomography segmentation.
RESULTS: Elbow mobility and arm and forearm circumference were symmetric for all patients. The visual analog scale for pain was 0.2 in the PLLA group and 0.7 in the PEEK group. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 5.4 and 98.7 in the PLLA group vs. 3.1 and 95.9 in the PEEK group. Bone tunnel enlargement of 43% in the PLLA and 38% in the PEEK group was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and functional outcome at more than 1 year after distal biceps tendon repair was excellent in both groups. Bone tunnel widening occurred in all patients.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps tendon; PEEK; PLLA; interference; osteolysis; repair

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26927430     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Interference screw insertion angle has no effect on graft fixation strength for insertional Achilles tendon reconstruction.

Authors:  Ziying Wu; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen; Kui Ma; Shengkun Li; Peng Zhang; Yinghui Hua
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anatomical intramedullary distal biceps tendon fixation. Our first experience.

Authors:  Pieter Caekebeke; Laurens Van Melkebeke; Joris Duerinckx; Roger van Riet
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-14

3.  Efficacy of the "Salento technique", a modified two-incision approach in distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Surgical description and outcomes analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rollo; Luigi Meccariello; Roberto Rotini; Paolo Pichierri; Michele Bisaccia; Mattia Fortina
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-02-08

Review 4.  Operative Versus Nonoperative Management for Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Cuzzolin; Davide Secco; Enrico Guerra; Sante Alessandro Altamura; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.