| Literature DB >> 26927135 |
Rita S W Yam1, Yen-Tzu Fan2, Tzu-Ting Wang3.
Abstract
Pomacea canaliculata (Ampullariidae) has extensively invaded most Asian constructed wetlands and its massive herbivory of macrophytes has become a major cause of ecosystem dysfunctioning of these restored habitats. We conducted non-choice laboratory feeding experiments of P. canaliculata using five common macrophyte species in constructed wetlands including Ipomoea aquatica, Commelina communis, Nymphoides coreana, Acorus calamus and Phragmites australis. Effects of macrophytes on snail feeding, growth and fecundity responses were evaluated. Results indicated that P. canaliculata reared on Ipomoea had the highest feeding and growth rates with highest reproductive output, but all individuals fed with Phragmites showed lowest feeding rates and little growth with poorest reproductive output. Plant N and P contents were important for enhancing palatability, supporting growth and offspring quantity of P. canaliculata, whilst toughness, cellulose and phenolics had critically deterrent effects on various life-history traits. Although snail offspring quality was generally consistent regardless of maternal feeding conditions, the reduced growth and offspring quantity of the poorly-fed snails in constructed wetlands dominated by the less-palatable macrophytes could limit the invasive success of P. canaliculata. Effective bottom-up control of P. canaliculata in constructed wetlands should involve selective planting strategy using macrophytes with low nutrient and high toughness, cellulose and phenolic contents.Entities:
Keywords: apple snails; aquatic plants; growth; herbivory; invasive species control; palatability; reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26927135 PMCID: PMC4808911 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Physical and chemical characteristics of the five study macrophyte species.
| Macrophyte | Type | N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin | Toughness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 4.28 ± 0.91 A | 0.70 ± 0.17 A | 0.22 ± 0.01 C | 8.60 ± 1.39 C | 1.75 ± 0.90 BC | 58.86 ± 16.63 D | |
| E | 3.72 ± 0.19 AB | 0.75 ± 0.03 A | 1.89 ± 1.26 B | 15.34 ± 1.27 B | 2.17 ± 0.07 B | 79.54 ± 11.35 C | |
| FL | 3.23 ± 0.34 B | 0.45 ± 0.04 B | 2.57 ± 0.05 AB | 21.13 ± 1.19 AB | 1.13 ± 0.39 C | 116.41 ± 20.57 B | |
| E | 2.18± 0.10 C | 0.36 ± 0.06 B | 3.08 ± 0.07 A | 22.11 ± 1.18 A | 1.11 ± 0.58 C | 176.65 ± 25.44 A | |
| E | 2.38 ± 0.30 C | 0.34 ± 0.05 B | 0.30 ± 0.01 C | 24.85 ± 1.09 A | 6.64 ± 0.57 A | 237.69 ± 38.57 A |
Unit for N, P, phenolics, cellulose and lignin = percentage with respect to the dry weight of leaf sample; unit for toughness = g. All macrophyte traits were significantly different among the five species (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.01). The superscript A, B, C and D represented significant groupings under post hoc Tukey comparisons.
Mean values (±SD) of percentage plant consumption and percentage SH-growth of Pomacea canaliculata fed with each of the five macrophyte species during the study period.
| Macrophyte | Plant Consumption | SH-Growth | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean % Feeding | Mean % SH-Growth | |||
| 57.18 ± 27.25 | 147.78 *** | 29.82 ± 8.61 | 78.41 *** | |
| 25.17 ± 8.58 | 249.76 *** | 17.43 ± 3.78 | 72.56 *** | |
| 48.15 ± 18.83 | 189.65 *** | 14.53 ± 5.16 | 62.23 *** | |
| 2.66 ± 1.07 | 177.31 *** | 1.46 ± 0.92 | 1.56 NS | |
| 1.33 ± 0.79 | 82.49 *** | 0.75 ± 0.55 | 0.55 NS | |
*** p < 0.001; NS no significance.
Figure 1Mean (+ SD) of different responses of Pomacea canaliculata upon fed with the five study macrophyte species: (a) feeding rate; (b) SH-growth; (c) DM-growth; (d) Number of clutches produced per female; (e) Clutch size; (f) DM-egg; (g) Egg hatching success; (h) DM-neonate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, NS no significance.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the macrophyte traits of the five study species.
| Macrophyte Trait | N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 0.831 | ||||
| Phenolics | −0.603 | NS | |||
| Cellulose | −0.715 | −0.418 | 0.541 | ||
| Lignin | −0.387 | −0.513 | −0.564 | NS | |
| Toughness | −0.690 | −0.705 | NS | 0.555 | 0.749 |
NS = No significance.
Summary statistics from analysis of best-subset regression comparing each attributes of the life-history traits of Pomacea canaliculata to macrophyte characteristics.
| Snail Life-History Trait | Constant | Nutrients | Defensive Traits | Adj. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin | Toughness | |||
| Feeding rate | 0.359 | 0.364 | −0.081 | −0.008 | 0.78 | |||
| SH-growth | 0.080 | 0.018 | −0.002 | −0.001 | 0.84 | |||
| DM-growth | 2.268 | 0.520 | −0.006 | −0.012 | 0.76 | |||
| No. of clutches per female | 4.870 | 0.127 | −0.211 | −0.181 | 0.41 | |||
| Clutch size | 71.429 | 66.814 | −12.914 | −1.664 | 0.60 | |||
| Egg hatching success | 67.449 | −11.821 | −2.410 | 0.23 | ||||
No macrophyte characteristic selected as predictor in the regression model of DM-egg and DM-neonate.