| Literature DB >> 26927135 |
Rita S W Yam1, Yen-Tzu Fan2, Tzu-Ting Wang3.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: apple snails; aquatic plants; growth; herbivory; invasive species control; palatability; reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26927135 PMCID: PMC4808911 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Physical and chemical characteristics of the five study macrophyte species.
| Macrophyte | Type | N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin | Toughness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 4.28 ± 0.91 A | 0.70 ± 0.17 A | 0.22 ± 0.01 C | 8.60 ± 1.39 C | 1.75 ± 0.90 BC | 58.86 ± 16.63 D | |
| E | 3.72 ± 0.19 AB | 0.75 ± 0.03 A | 1.89 ± 1.26 B | 15.34 ± 1.27 B | 2.17 ± 0.07 B | 79.54 ± 11.35 C | |
| FL | 3.23 ± 0.34 B | 0.45 ± 0.04 B | 2.57 ± 0.05 AB | 21.13 ± 1.19 AB | 1.13 ± 0.39 C | 116.41 ± 20.57 B | |
| E | 2.18± 0.10 C | 0.36 ± 0.06 B | 3.08 ± 0.07 A | 22.11 ± 1.18 A | 1.11 ± 0.58 C | 176.65 ± 25.44 A | |
| E | 2.38 ± 0.30 C | 0.34 ± 0.05 B | 0.30 ± 0.01 C | 24.85 ± 1.09 A | 6.64 ± 0.57 A | 237.69 ± 38.57 A |
Unit for N, P, phenolics, cellulose and lignin = percentage with respect to the dry weight of leaf sample; unit for toughness = g. All macrophyte traits were significantly different among the five species (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.01). The superscript A, B, C and D represented significant groupings under post hoc Tukey comparisons.
Mean values (±SD) of percentage plant consumption and percentage SH-growth of Pomacea canaliculata fed with each of the five macrophyte species during the study period.
| Macrophyte | Plant Consumption | SH-Growth | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean % Feeding | Mean % SH-Growth | |||
| 57.18 ± 27.25 | 147.78 *** | 29.82 ± 8.61 | 78.41 *** | |
| 25.17 ± 8.58 | 249.76 *** | 17.43 ± 3.78 | 72.56 *** | |
| 48.15 ± 18.83 | 189.65 *** | 14.53 ± 5.16 | 62.23 *** | |
| 2.66 ± 1.07 | 177.31 *** | 1.46 ± 0.92 | 1.56 NS | |
| 1.33 ± 0.79 | 82.49 *** | 0.75 ± 0.55 | 0.55 NS | |
*** p < 0.001; NS no significance.
Figure 1Mean (+ SD) of different responses of Pomacea canaliculata upon fed with the five study macrophyte species: (a) feeding rate; (b) SH-growth; (c) DM-growth; (d) Number of clutches produced per female; (e) Clutch size; (f) DM-egg; (g) Egg hatching success; (h) DM-neonate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, NS no significance.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the macrophyte traits of the five study species.
| Macrophyte Trait | N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 0.831 | ||||
| Phenolics | −0.603 | NS | |||
| Cellulose | −0.715 | −0.418 | 0.541 | ||
| Lignin | −0.387 | −0.513 | −0.564 | NS | |
| Toughness | −0.690 | −0.705 | NS | 0.555 | 0.749 |
NS = No significance.
Summary statistics from analysis of best-subset regression comparing each attributes of the life-history traits of Pomacea canaliculata to macrophyte characteristics.
| Snail Life-History Trait | Constant | Nutrients | Defensive Traits | Adj. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | Phenolics | Cellulose | Lignin | Toughness | |||
| Feeding rate | 0.359 | 0.364 | −0.081 | −0.008 | 0.78 | |||
| SH-growth | 0.080 | 0.018 | −0.002 | −0.001 | 0.84 | |||
| DM-growth | 2.268 | 0.520 | −0.006 | −0.012 | 0.76 | |||
| No. of clutches per female | 4.870 | 0.127 | −0.211 | −0.181 | 0.41 | |||
| Clutch size | 71.429 | 66.814 | −12.914 | −1.664 | 0.60 | |||
| Egg hatching success | 67.449 | −11.821 | −2.410 | 0.23 | ||||
No macrophyte characteristic selected as predictor in the regression model of DM-egg and DM-neonate.