| Literature DB >> 26926947 |
R W Lamont1, G C Conroy1, P Reddell2, S M Ogbourne3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fontainea picrosperma, a subcanopy tree endemic to the rainforests of northeastern Australia, is of medicinal significance following the discovery of the novel anti-cancer natural product, EBC-46. Laboratory synthesis of EBC-46 is unlikely to be commercially feasible and consequently production of the molecule is via isolation from F. picrosperma grown in plantations. Successful domestication and plantation production requires an intimate knowledge of a taxon's life-history attributes and genetic architecture, not only to ensure the maximum capture of genetic diversity from wild source populations, but also to minimise the risk of a detrimental loss in genetic diversity via founder effects during subsequent breeding programs designed to enhance commercially significant agronomic traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26926947 PMCID: PMC4772518 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0743-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Characterization of eleven microsatellite loci isolated from 218 individuals of Fontainea picrosperma
| Locus GenBank | Repeat motif | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Size range (bp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP21 | (TA)13 | F: TCACTGAATTCGCTTGGTTG | 194–204 | 0.596 | 6 | 0.532 | 0.664 | 0.000 |
| FP32 | (GT)8 | F: CTGGCTTGCATTTGCTTGTA | 190–192 | 0.329 | 2 | 0.339 | 0.416 | −0.034 |
| FP39 | (GA)15 | F: CTGCACGACAAGAAAACTCG | 203–213 | 0.293 | 3 | 0.280 | 0.325 | −0.004 |
| FP40 | (TG)16 | F: TTCTCGTCCTCTACTGGGCT | 134–152 | 0.455 | 6 | 0.550 | 0.551 | −0.096 |
| FP44 | (AT)7 | F: TGAAGCTAATTGCTTGATCTTCC | 112–122 | 0.390 | 5 | 0.459 | 0.505 | −0.117 |
| FP47 | (TC)7 | F: CCTAAAAGTGCCCTTTGGCTA | 238–242 | 0.284 | 3 | 0.307 | 0.338 | −0.192 |
| FP49 | (GA)8 | F: TTTATACAACCACCAGTCGCC R: CACCTTCACTGAAATTCTCTTCTTC | 171–175 | 0.479 | 3 | 0.468 | 0.537 | 0.013 |
| FP56 | (TA)14 | F: CAGGGCTTAGAATCGGGTGT R: TCACATCCTAGGTCCGTTCAC | 258–270 | 0.776 | 7 | 0.391 | 0.806 | 0.390 |
| FP59 | (AT)11 | F: TCCCTCCTGTTAAGACTGTTACA R: CCTTCACCATCAATCAGCCG | 210–218 | 0.163 | 2 | 0.143 | 0.179 | 0.128 |
| FP62 | (TC)11 | F: TGAAAATGCTGACCAAATATGTGA R: AGTTTCCCAGGATCCCACAT | 271–273 | 0.375 | 2 | 0.468 | 0.501 | −0.086 |
| FP64 | (GAC)11 | F: ACGGTGAAGACGATGATGGT R: CGTGTGTTACCTCTTCTTCAGC | 108–129 | 0.581 | 6 | 0.385 | 0.631 | 0.075 |
| Mean | 0.429 | 4.1 | 0.393 | 0.496 | 0.007 |
Samples were collected from the Atherton Tablelands, Australia from seven locations shown in Fig. 1. PIC polymorphic information content; N number of alleles; H observed heterozygosity; H expected heterozygosity; F inbreeding coefficient
Summary of genetic measures for the 218 individuals sampled from seven populations of F. picrosperma
| Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evelyn Highlands | 68 | 5 | 15 | 3.182 | 2.580 | 0.060 | 0.350 | 0.432 | 0.149 |
| Boonjie | 45 | 19 | 9 | 3.545 | 2.840 | 0.120 | 0.459 | 0.507 | 0.066 |
| East Barron | 26 | 3 | 12 | 2.909 | 2.440 | 0.180 | 0.374 | 0.410 | 0.078 |
| Malanda | 17 | 10 | 1 | 2.636 | 2.500 | 0.050 | 0.487 | 0.447 | −0.115 |
| Topaz | 22 | 11 | 5 | 3.000 | 2.650 | 0.110 | 0.417 | 0.415 | 0.015 |
| Gadgarra | 18 | 4 | 5 | 2.182 | 1.980 | 0.000 | 0.298 | 0.264 | −0.139 |
| Towalla | 22 | 3 | 8 | 2.364 | 2.240 | 0.000 | 0.397 | 0.372 | −0.093 |
| Mean | 31.03 (1.974) | 55 | 55 | 2.831 (0.142) | 2.480 (0.108) | 0.076 (0.026) | 0.397 (0.023) | 0.407 (0.022) | −0.003 (0.030) |
n, number of plants sampled per population; n♀, number of female plants sampled per population; n♂, number of male plants sampled per population; A, mean number of alleles per locus; A , allelic richness (based on a minimal sample size of 17); PA , private allelic richness; H mean observed heterozygosity; H mean expected heterozygosity; F fixation index. Standard errors in parenthesis
Fig. 1Map of sampling locations for F. picrosperma genetic variation study. Each sampling area is represented by a yellow circle or oval
Pairwise population F (below diagonal) and N (above diagonal) values
| Evelyn Highlands | Boonjie | East Barron | Malanda | Topaz | Gadgarra | Towalla | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evelyn Highlands | 0.000 |
| 0.850 |
|
| 0.956 |
|
| Boonjie | 0.105 | 0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| East Barron | 0.227 | 0.155 | 0.000 | 0.979 | 0.786 | 0.579 | 0.812 |
| Malanda | 0.085 | 0.105 | 0.203 | 0.000 |
| 0.682 |
|
| Topaz | 0.112 | 0.079 | 0.241 | 0.064 | 0.000 | 0.834 |
|
| Gadgarra | 0.207 | 0.136 | 0.302 | 0.268 | 0.231 | 0.000 | 0.745 |
| Towalla | 0.162 | 0.119 | 0.235 | 0.075 | 0.035 | 0.251 | 0.000 |
Mean F = 0.153. Mean N = 1.382. Effective levels of past gene flow among the seven populations of F. picrosperma assessed are indicated in bold type. Values based on 999 permutations
Fig. 2UPGMA cluster analysis of the seven populations of F. picrosperma. Genetic distances were calculated using pairwise F [58] measures of genetic distance
Fig. 3Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of F. picrosperma individuals using genetic distance matrices. Individuals from the seven populations are indicated by the symbols illustrated. Coordinate axis 1 accounts for 14.53 % of variation within the data, axis 2, 12.05 % and axis 3, 10.59 %. The cumulative percentage for the first three axes combined explain 37.17 % of the variation
Fig. 4Admixture bar plots representing the identity of individuals based on assignment using Bayesian modelling. Each individual is shown as a vertical line partitioned into K coloured segments whose length is proportional to the individual coefficients of membership in K = 2 to K = 7 genetic clusters that represent the populations assessed (top). The average membership of individuals of the K = 3 clusters (selected as the best estimate of the number of genetic clusters following implementation of the Evanno method [17]) for each sub-population are presented as pie charts, superimposed onto the location map to provide geographic perspective (bottom)