OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of environmental barriers perceived by people living with spinal cord injury in the Swiss community and to compare this across subpopulations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,549 participants in the community survey of the Swiss spinal cord injury Cohort study. METHODS: The perceived impact of environmental barriers on participation was measured with the Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory Short Form (NEFI-SF). Physical independence was measured with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self Report (SCIM-SR). Perceived barriers were compared across people with different demographic and lesion characteristics. Multivariable regression modelling applying fractional polynomials was used to evaluate the overall perceived impact of barriers in relation to demographics, spinal cord injury characteristics, and physical independence. RESULTS: Most perceived barriers were climatic conditions and inaccessibility of public and private infrastructure. Older participants, those with longer time since injury and participants with complete lesions indicated more problems with access. Females reported more attitudinal barriers. Approximately one-third of participants with complete tetraplegia reported obstacles related to assistance with personal care. A higher level of physical independence was associated with fewer perceived barriers. CONCLUSION: Despite living in a rich country with a well-developed social security system, many people with spinal cord injury in Switzerland experience participation restrictions due to environmental barriers; in particular women, people with non-traumatic spinal cord injury and limited physical independence.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of environmental barriers perceived by people living with spinal cord injury in the Swiss community and to compare this across subpopulations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,549 participants in the community survey of the Swiss spinal cord injury Cohort study. METHODS: The perceived impact of environmental barriers on participation was measured with the Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory Short Form (NEFI-SF). Physical independence was measured with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self Report (SCIM-SR). Perceived barriers were compared across people with different demographic and lesion characteristics. Multivariable regression modelling applying fractional polynomials was used to evaluate the overall perceived impact of barriers in relation to demographics, spinal cord injury characteristics, and physical independence. RESULTS: Most perceived barriers were climatic conditions and inaccessibility of public and private infrastructure. Older participants, those with longer time since injury and participants with complete lesions indicated more problems with access. Females reported more attitudinal barriers. Approximately one-third of participants with complete tetraplegia reported obstacles related to assistance with personal care. A higher level of physical independence was associated with fewer perceived barriers. CONCLUSION: Despite living in a rich country with a well-developed social security system, many people with spinal cord injury in Switzerland experience participation restrictions due to environmental barriers; in particular women, people with non-traumatic spinal cord injury and limited physical independence.
Authors: Lizette Norin; Björn Slaug; Maria Haak; Sophie Jörgensen; Jan Lexell; Susanne Iwarsson Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: J J Carr; M B Kendall; D I Amsters; K J Pershouse; P Kuipers; P Buettner; R N Barker Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Elias Ronca; Anke Scheel-Sailer; Hans Georg Koch; Stefan Essig; Mirjam Brach; Nadja Münzel; Armin Gemperli Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Jan D Reinhardt; Marcel W M Post; Christine Fekete; Bruno Trezzini; Martin W G Brinkhof Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 3.240