Literature DB >> 26926888

First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--Chapter 2b: genetically modified source pigs.

Peter J Cowan1, David Ayares2, Eckhard Wolf3, David K C Cooper4.   

Abstract

Genetic modification of the source pig offers the opportunity to improve the engraftment and survival of islet xenografts. The type of modification can be tailored to the transplant setting; for example, intraportal islet xenografts have been shown to benefit from the expression of anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory transgenes, whereas cytoprotective transgenes are probably more relevant for encapsulated islets. The rapid development of pig genetic engineering, particularly with the introduction of genome editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas, has accelerated the generation of new pig lines with multiple modifications. With pre-clinical testing in progress, it is an opportune time to consider any implications of genetic modification for the conditions for undertaking clinical trials. Obviously, the stringent requirements to fulfill designated pathogen-free status that are applied to wild-type pigs will apply equally to genetically modified (GM) source pigs. In addition, it is important from a safety perspective that the genetic modifications are characterized at the molecular level (e.g., integration site, absence of off-target mutations), the phenotypic level (e.g., durability and stability of transgene expression), and the functional level (e.g., protection of islets in vitro or in vivo, absence of detrimental effects on insulin secretion). The assessment of clinical trial protocols using GM pig islets will need to be performed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account a range of factors including the particular genetic modification(s) and the site and method of delivery.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic modification; genome editing; islet xenotransplantation; multitransgenic; site-specific nuclease

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26926888     DOI: 10.1111/xen.12224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pig-to-Primate Islet Xenotransplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Zhengzhao Liu; Wenbao Hu; Tian He; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; Rita Bottino; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Advances in islet encapsulation technologies.

Authors:  Tejal Desai; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Islet cell transplant: Update on current clinical trials.

Authors:  Christian Schuetz; James F Markmann
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2016-05-17

Review 4.  Xenotransplantation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Ping Li; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Xenoantigen Deletion and Chemical Immunosuppression Can Prolong Renal Xenograft Survival.

Authors:  Andrew B Adams; Steven C Kim; Gregory R Martens; Joseph M Ladowski; Jose L Estrada; Luz M Reyes; Cindy Breeden; Allison Stephenson; Devin E Eckhoff; Matt Tector; Alfred Joseph Tector
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Gene Editing, Gene Therapy, and Cell Xenotransplantation: Cell Transplantation Across Species.

Authors:  Nizar I Mourad; Pierre Gianello
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence S Gazda; James Collins; Archie Lovatt; Robert W Holdcraft; Merribeth J Morin; Daniel Galbraith; Melanie Graham; Melissa A Laramore; Christine Maclean; John Black; Euan W Milne; Douglas G Marthaler; Horatiu V Vinerean; Michelle M Michalak; Deborah Hoffer; Steven Richter; Richard D Hall; Barry H Smith
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.907

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.