| Literature DB >> 26926775 |
Christian Schulz1,2, Kerstin Schütte3, Siegfried Kropf4, Friedhelm C Schmitt5, Riccardo Vasapolli6, Leon M Kliegis7, Antonia Riegger8, Peter Malfertheiner9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a clinically significant complication of liver cirrhosis impacting on the patients' quality of life. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is diagnosed by psychometric tests, found in up to 80 % of patients with liver cirrhosis and carries a high risk of progression to overt HE. Continuous therapy with rifaximin in combination with lactulose significantly reduces the risk of overt HE, recurrence of HE and HE-related hospitalizations in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Rifaximin is approved for the therapy of overt HE in Germany. Treatment with lactulose has been shown to improve cognitive functions in patients with liver cirrhosis. Data from prospective clinical trials comparing the efficacy of rifaximin alone against a combination of rifaximin and lactulose in the treatment of MHE are scarce. Changes in the microbiome of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract as a result of therapy with rifaximin have not yet been addressed in clinical studies. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26926775 PMCID: PMC4770677 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1205-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Fig. 1Study flow chart
Clinical treatment plan
| Inclusion into study | Screening | Assignment to treatment group | Treatment phase | EOT | 6 weeks after EOT | 12 weeks after EOT = End of study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Day −15 –day 0 | 0 (visit 0) | Days 1–90 (visits 1–3) −3d to +3d | Visit 3 | Day 129– day 135 (visit 5) −3d to +3d | Day 171– day 177 (visit 6) −3d to +3d | |
| Informed consent | x | ||||||
| Demographics | X | ||||||
| Medical history concomitant medication | X | x | X | x | X | ||
| Physical exam, vital signs, weight | X | x | x | X | x | X | |
| ECG | X | ||||||
| ECOG performance status and QOL assessment | X | x | x | X | x | X | |
| Blood tests including pregnancy test | X | x | x | X | x | X | |
| EGD with biopsies | x | X | x | X | |||
| Inclusion into study | Screening | Assignment to treatment group | Treatment phase | EOT | 6 weeks after EOT | 12 weeks after EOT = End of study | |
| Time | Day −15–day 0 | 0 (visit 0) | Days 1–90 (visits 1–3) −3d to +3d | Visit 3 | Day 129– day 135 (visit 5) −3d to +3d | Day 171– day 177 (visit 6) −3d to +3d | |
|
| x | ||||||
| Stool samples | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| Rapid urease test | x | ||||||
| Assessment of neurocognitive function (NCT-A, CFF, VEP, EEG) | X | Days 1–28 weekly, then every 4 weeks | >x | x | x |
CFF critical flicker frequency, ECG electrocardiogram ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology group, EEG electroencephalogram, EGD esophagogastroduodenoscopy, EOT end of treatment, NCT-A number-connection test A, QOL quality of life, VEP visual evoked potentials