Literature DB >> 26926281

The effects of environment and ownership on children's innovation of tools and tool material selection.

Kimberly M Sheridan1, Abigail W Konopasky1, Sophie Kirkwood2, Margaret A Defeyter3.   

Abstract

Research indicates that in experimental settings, young children of 3-7 years old are unlikely to devise a simple tool to solve a problem. This series of exploratory studies done in museums in the US and UK explores how environment and ownership of materials may improve children's ability and inclination for (i) tool material selection and (ii) innovation. The first study takes place in a children's museum, an environment where children can use tools and materials freely. We replicated a tool innovation task in this environment and found that while 3-4 year olds showed the predicted low levels of innovation rates, 4-7 year olds showed higher rates of innovation than the younger children and than reported in prior studies. The second study explores the effect of whether the experimental materials are owned by the experimenter or the child on tool selection and innovation. Results showed that 5-6 year olds and 6-7 year olds were more likely to select tool material they owned compared to tool material owned by the experimenter, although ownership had no effect on tool innovation. We argue that learning environments supporting tool exploration and invention and conveying ownership over materials may encourage successful tool innovation at earlier ages.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive development; environment; innovation; ownership; tools

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26926281      PMCID: PMC4780533          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  31 in total

1.  Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan.

Authors:  M E McCarty; R K Clifton; R R Collard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Young children overimitate in third-party contexts.

Authors:  Mark Nielsen; Chris Moore; Jumana Mohamedally
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 3.  A developmental perspective on executive function.

Authors:  John R Best; Patricia H Miller
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Putting the social into social learning: explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children's copying behavior.

Authors:  Harriet Over; Malinda Carpenter
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Overimitation in Kalahari Bushman children and the origins of human cultural cognition.

Authors:  Mark Nielsen; Keyan Tomaselli
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-16

6.  Memory retrieval by 18--30-month-olds: age-related changes in representational flexibility.

Authors:  J Herbert; H Hayne
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2000-07

7.  Making tools isn't child's play.

Authors:  Sarah R Beck; Ian A Apperly; Jackie Chappell; Carlie Guthrie; Nicola Cutting
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-02-18

8.  Imitation of televised models by infants.

Authors:  A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1988-10

9.  The development of tool manufacture in humans: what helps young children make innovative tools?

Authors:  Jackie Chappell; Nicola Cutting; Ian A Apperly; Sarah R Beck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Determining who owns what: do children infer ownership from first possession?

Authors:  Ori Friedman; Karen R Neary
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-20
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Adaptable individuals and innovative lineages.

Authors:  Kim Sterelny
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions.

Authors:  Simon M Reader; Julie Morand-Ferron; Emma Flynn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Young children fail to generate an additive ratchet effect in an open-ended construction task.

Authors:  Eva Reindl; Claudio Tennie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.