Literature DB >> 26925471

Minimally invasive treatment options in fixed prosthodontics.

Daniel Edelhoff, Anja Liebermann, Florian Beuer, Michael Stimmelmayr, Jan-Frederik Güth.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive treatment options have become increasingly feasible in restorative dentistry, due to the introduction of the adhesive technique in combination with restorative materials featuring translucent properties similar to those of natural teeth. Mechanical anchoring of restorations via conventional cementation represents a predominantly subtractive treatment approach that is gradually being superseded by a primarily defect-oriented additive method in prosthodontics. Modifications of conventional treatment procedures have led to the development of an economical approach to the removal of healthy tooth structure. This is possible because the planned treatment outcome is defined in a wax-up before the treatment is commenced and this wax-up is subsequently used as a reference during tooth preparation. Similarly, resin- bonded FDPs and implants have made it possible to preserve the natural tooth structure of potential abutment teeth. This report describes a number of clinical cases to demonstrate the principles of modern prosthetic treatment strategies and discusses these approaches in the context of minimally invasive prosthetic dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26925471     DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a35115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  7 in total

1.  Minimal invasive microscopic tooth preparation in esthetic restoration: a specialist consensus.

Authors:  Haiyang Yu; Yuwei Zhao; Junying Li; Tian Luo; Jing Gao; Hongchen Liu; Weicai Liu; Feng Liu; Ke Zhao; Fei Liu; Chufan Ma; Juergen M Setz; Shanshan Liang; Lin Fan; Shanshan Gao; Zhuoli Zhu; Jiefei Shen; Jian Wang; Zhimin Zhu; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.344

2.  Arithmetic Relationship between Fracture Load and Material Thickness of Resin-Based CAD-CAM Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Tobias Graf; Josef Schweiger; Jan-Frederik Güth; Thomas Sciuk; Oliver Schubert; Kurt-Jürgen Erdelt
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 3.  Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni; Sarah Arzani; Sasan Rasaeipour; Mina Shekarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report.

Authors:  Miguel Stanley; Ana Gomes Paz; Inês Miguel; Christian Coachman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Christine Keul; Gintare Burian; Josef Schweiger; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Fracture Resistance in Non-Vital Teeth: Absence of Interproximal Ferrule and Influence of Preparation Depth in CAD/CAM Endocrown Overlays-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Lucía Barallat; María Arregui; Sandra Fernandez-Villar; Blanca Paniagua; Andrés Pascual-La Rocca
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Congenitally Missing Central Incisors: A Case Report.

Authors:  Carlos Jurado; Nicholas G Fischer; Chin-Chuan Fu; Akimasa Tsujimoto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.