Literature DB >> 26924905

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Vaginal Insertion and Intra-Cesarean Insertion of Post-Partum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device.

Abhijit Halder1, M S Sowmya1, Abhimannyu Gayen1, Popli Bhattacharya1, Sanjay Mukherjee1, Siddhartha Datta1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation and comparison of safety and efficacy of vaginal and intra-cesarean insertion of Post-Partum Intrauterine Contraceptive device (PPIUCD).
METHODS: An interventional prospective study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at NRS Medical College, Kolkata. PPIUCD were inserted in 263 mothers in 1-year study period. Among them, first 100 mothers who delivered vaginally and the first 100 who underwent cesarean section were regarded as study groups and were followed up for 1 year.
RESULTS: Both modes of PPIUCD insertion were found to have very low rates of expulsion, vaginal bleeding, infection, missing strings, and also effective as contraceptive. Expulsion rate was 4 % in the vaginal group and 2 % in intra-cesarean group. Strings of PPIUCD were less visible after cesarean insertion than vaginal insertion (p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: PPIUCD is an appealing approach and may become the best choice as post-partum contraception after vaginal as well as cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immediate post-partum; Intra-cesarean insertion; PPIUCD; Vaginal insertion- post-placental

Year:  2014        PMID: 26924905      PMCID: PMC4755943          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0640-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

Review 1.  Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Huib Aam Van Vliet; Nancy L Stanwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

2.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia Letti Müller; José Geraldo Lopes Ramos; Sérgio H Martins-Costa; Ricardo S Palma Dias; Edimárlei G Valério; Luciano S Hammes; Cristina L Glitz; Angela E Zucatto; Daniela V Vettori; José Antonio A Magalhães
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Kapp; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Levi; Evelyn Cantillo; Veronica Ades; Erika Banks; Amitasrigowri Murthy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Post-partum bleeding and infection after post-placental IUD insertion.

Authors:  S Welkovic; L O Costa; A Faúndes; R de Alencar Ximenes; C F Costa
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section.

Authors:  Şevki Çelen; Ayhan Sucak; Yasemin Yıldız; Nuri Danışman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience.

Authors:  Safwat A Mohamed; Momen A Kamel; Omar M Shaaban; Hossam T Salem
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Intraoperative placement of the Copper T-380 intrauterine devices in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anita L Nelson; Stephanie Chen; Robert Eden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Authors:  Sevki Celen; Perran Möröy; Ayhan Sucak; Ayla Aktulay; Nuri Danişman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.375

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.