Literature DB >> 26924879

The effect of sediment mixing on mercury dynamics in two intertidal mudflats at Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire, USA.

Lauren E Brown1, Celia Y Chen2, Mary A Voytek3, Aria Amirbahman1.   

Abstract

Estuarine sediments store particulate contaminants including mercury (Hg). We studied Hg sediment dynamics in two intertidal mudflats at Great Bay estuary, NH, over multiple years. Sediments at both mudflats were physically mixed down to ~10 cm, as determined by 7Be measurements, albeit via different mechanisms. Portsmouth mudflat (PT) sediments were subject to bioturbation by infaunal organisms and Squamscott mudflat (SQ) sediments were subject to erosion and redeposition. The presence of higher concentrations of fresh Fe(III) hydroxide at PT suggested bioirrigation by the polychaetes (Nereis virens). At depths where infaunal bioirrigation was observed, pore-water inorganic Hg (Hgi) and methylmercury (MeHg) were lower potentially due to their interaction with Fe(III) hydroxide. Methylmercury concentrations increased immediately below this zone in some samples, suggesting that the observed increase in material flux in bioirrigated sediments may initiate from lower depths. Pore water in sediment at PT also had higher fractions of more protein-like and labile DOC than those at SQ that can lead to increased MeHg production in PT, especially at depths where Hgi is not removed from solution by Fe(III) hydroxide. Where sediment erosion and redeposition were observed at SQ, Hg species distribution was extended deeper into the sediment column. Moreover, methyl coenzyme M reductase (MCR) and mercury reductase (mer-A) genes were higher at SQ than PT suggesting differences in conditions for Hg cycling. Results showed that the near-surface region of high MeHg concentrations commonly observed in unmixed sediments does not exist in physically mixed sediments that are common in many estuarine environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Estuary; Mercury; Methylmercury; Sediment

Year:  2015        PMID: 26924879      PMCID: PMC4765959          DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Chem        ISSN: 0304-4203            Impact factor:   3.807


  28 in total

1.  Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Paul Westerhoff; Jerry A Leenheer; Karl Booksh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Mircea Podar; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew M Graham; Steven D Brown; Anil C Somenahally; Alex Johs; Richard A Hurt; Kathryn L Bailey; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Marine biogeochemical cycling of mercury.

Authors:  William F Fitzgerald; Carl H Lamborg; Chad R Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Effect of bioirrigation on sediment-water exchange of methylmercury in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts.

Authors:  Janina M Benoit; David H Shull; Rebecca M Harvey; Samuel A Beal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  Lars Lambertsson; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Mercury methylation rates for geochemically relevant Hg(II) species in sediments.

Authors:  Sofi Jonsson; Ulf Skyllberg; Mats B Nilsson; Per-Olof Westlund; Andrey Shchukarev; Erik Lundberg; Erik Björn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  High temporal resolution oxygen imaging in bioirrigated sediments.

Authors:  Lubos Polerecky; Nils Volkenborn; Peter Stief
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?

Authors:  Andreas Drott; Lars Lambertsson; Erik Björn; Ulf Skyllberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Evidence on the human health effects of low-level methylmercury exposure.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Anna L Choi; Emily Oken; Milena Horvat; Rita Schoeny; Elizabeth Kamai; Whitney Cowell; Philippe Grandjean; Susan Korrick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.