Literature DB >> 26924826

Brain-computer interface devices for patients with paralysis and amputation: a meeting report.

K Bowsher1, E F Civillico, J Coburn, J Collinger, J L Contreras-Vidal, T Denison, J Donoghue, J French, N Getzoff, L R Hochberg, M Hoffmann, J Judy, N Kleitman, G Knaack, V Krauthamer, K Ludwig, M Moynahan, J J Pancrazio, P H Peckham, C Pena, V Pinto, T Ryan, D Saha, H Scharen, S Shermer, K Skodacek, P Takmakov, D Tyler, S Vasudevan, K Wachrathit, D Weber, C G Welle, M Ye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) believes it is important to help stakeholders (e.g., manufacturers, health-care professionals, patients, patient advocates, academia, and other government agencies) navigate the regulatory landscape for medical devices. For innovative devices involving brain-computer interfaces, this is particularly important. APPROACH: Towards this goal, on 21 November, 2014, CDRH held an open public workshop on its White Oak, MD campus with the aim of fostering an open discussion on the scientific and clinical considerations associated with the development of brain-computer interface (BCI) devices, defined for the purposes of this workshop as neuroprostheses that interface with the central or peripheral nervous system to restore lost motor or sensory capabilities. MAIN
RESULTS: This paper summarizes the presentations and discussions from that workshop. SIGNIFICANCE: CDRH plans to use this information to develop regulatory considerations that will promote innovation while maintaining appropriate patient protections. FDA plans to build on advances in regulatory science and input provided in this workshop to develop guidance that provides recommendations for premarket submissions for BCI devices. These proceedings will be a resource for the BCI community during the development of medical devices for consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26924826     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/023001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  12 in total

Review 1.  Neural engineering: the process, applications, and its role in the future of medicine.

Authors:  Evon S Ereifej; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Hamid Charkhkar; Ivana Cuberovic; Alan D Dorval; Emily L Graczyk; Takashi D Y Kozai; Kevin J Otto; Dustin J Tyler; Cristin G Welle; Alik S Widge; José Zariffa; Chet T Moritz; Dennis J Bourbeau; Paul D Marasco
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Monika Goss-Varley; Andrew J Shoffstall; Keith R Dona; Justin A McMahon; Sydney C Lindner; Evon S Ereifej; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Neuroprosthetics and the science of patient input.

Authors:  Heather L Benz; Eugene F Civillico
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael J Young; David J Lin; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.212

5.  EEG Negativity in Fixations Used for Gaze-Based Control: Toward Converting Intentions into Actions with an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Sergei L Shishkin; Yuri O Nuzhdin; Evgeny P Svirin; Alexander G Trofimov; Anastasia A Fedorova; Bogdan L Kozyrskiy; Boris M Velichkovsky
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation of People with Motor Impairment: A Novel Approach of the 21 st Century.

Authors:  Ioulietta Lazarou; Spiros Nikolopoulos; Panagiotis C Petrantonakis; Ioannis Kompatsiaris; Magda Tsolaki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Design Choices for Next-Generation Neurotechnology Can Impact Motion Artifact in Electrophysiological and Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry Measurements.

Authors:  Evan N Nicolai; Nicholas J Michelson; Megan L Settell; Seth A Hara; James K Trevathan; Anders J Asp; Kaylene C Stocking; J Luis Lujan; Takashi D Y Kozai; Kip A Ludwig
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Adding wisdom to 'smart' bioelectronic systems: a design framework for physiologic control including practical examples.

Authors:  Aysegul Gunduz; Enrico Opri; Ro'ee Gilron; Vaclav Kremen; Gregory Worrell; Phil Starr; Kent Leyde; Timothy Denison
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-30

9.  Agency and Accountability: Ethical Considerations for Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Authors:  Erika J Davidoff
Journal:  Rutgers J Bioeth       Date:  2020

10.  Clinician awareness of brain computer interfaces: a Canadian national survey.

Authors:  Sasha Letourneau; Ephrem Takele Zewdie; Zeanna Jadavji; John Andersen; Lee M Burkholder; Adam Kirton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.