Literature DB >> 26924824

Surface energy and stiffness discrete gradients in additive manufactured scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.

Andrea Di Luca1, Alessia Longoni, Giuseppe Criscenti, Ivan Lorenzo-Moldero, Michel Klein-Gunnewiek, Julius Vancso, Clemens van Blitterswijk, Carlos Mota, Lorenzo Moroni.   

Abstract

Swift progress in biofabrication technologies has enabled unprecedented advances in the application of developmental biology design criteria in three-dimensional scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Considering that tissues and organs in the human body develop following specific physico-chemical gradients, in this study, we hypothesized that additive manufacturing (AM) technologies would significantly aid in the construction of 3D scaffolds encompassing such gradients. Specifically, we considered surface energy and stiffness gradients and analyzed their effect on adult bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into skeletal lineages. Discrete step-wise macroscopic gradients were obtained by sequentially depositing different biodegradable biomaterials in the AM process, namely poly(lactic acid) (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) copolymers. At the bulk level, PEOT/PBT homogeneous scaffolds supported a higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity compared to PCL, PLA, and gradient scaffolds, respectively. All homogeneous biomaterial scaffolds supported also a significantly higher amount of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) production compared to discrete gradient scaffolds. Interestingly, the analysis of the different material compartments revealed a specific contribution of PCL, PLA, and PEOT/PBT to surface energy gradients. Whereas PEOT/PBT regions were associated to significantly higher ALP activity, PLA regions correlated with significantly higher GAG production. These results show that cell activity could be influenced by the specific spatial distribution of different biomaterial chemistries in a 3D scaffold and that engineering surface energy discrete gradients could be considered as an appealing criterion to design scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26924824     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  10 in total

1.  Functionally graded biomaterials for use as model systems and replacement tissues.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lowen; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 2.  3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds.

Authors:  Laura G Bracaglia; Brandon T Smith; Emma Watson; Navein Arumugasaamy; Antonios G Mikos; John P Fisher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Brandon T Smith; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Carrigan D Hudgins; Anthony J Melchiorri; David W Scott; John P Fisher; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Three-dimensional Printing of Multilayered Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Jason L Guo; Anthony Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 31.041

5.  Repositioning Titanium: An In Vitro Evaluation of Laser-Generated Microporous, Microrough Titanium Templates As a Potential Bridging Interface for Enhanced Osseointegration and Durability of Implants.

Authors:  Daniel Tang; Liang-Yo Yang; Keng-Liang Ou; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 6.  Biofabrication and Bone Tissue Regeneration: Cell Source, Approaches, and Challenges.

Authors:  Monia Orciani; Milena Fini; Roberto Di Primio; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 7.  Strategies to Improve Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Tianyu Yao; Matthew B Baker; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Additive manufactured, highly resilient, elastic, and biodegradable poly(ester)urethane scaffolds with chondroinductive properties for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  S Camarero-Espinosa; C Tomasina; A Calore; L Moroni
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2020-04-13

9.  scafSLICR: A MATLAB-based slicing algorithm to enable 3D-printing of tissue engineering scaffolds with heterogeneous porous microarchitecture.

Authors:  Ethan Nyberg; Aine O'Sullivan; Warren Grayson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 10.  3D Printed Multiphasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Repair: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie E Doyle; Finn Snow; Serena Duchi; Cathal D O'Connell; Carmine Onofrillo; Claudia Di Bella; Elena Pirogova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.