Literature DB >> 26924551

Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?

David Moher1, Steven N Goodman2, John P A Ioannidis2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26924551     DOI: 10.1111/eci.12612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?

Authors:  Matthew J Page; David Moher
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  How to design preclinical studies in nanomedicine and cell therapy to maximize the prospects of clinical translation.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Betty Y S Kim; Alan Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.

Authors:  David Moher; Florian Naudet; Ioana A Cristea; Frank Miedema; John P A Ioannidis; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Collaboration in orthodontic clinical trials: prevalence and association with sample size and funding.

Authors:  D Al-Moghrabi; A Tsichlaki; N Pandis; P S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.

Authors:  Danielle B Rice; Hana Raffoul; John P A Ioannidis; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-25

7.  The impact of caring for children on women's research output: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren Sewell; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Randomly auditing research labs could be an affordable way to improve research quality: A simulation study.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Pauline Zardo; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.