Literature DB >> 26924387

Meta-epidemiological study: a step-by-step approach by using R.

Zhongheng Zhang1.   

Abstract

The results of meta-analysis are usually influenced by characteristics of component trials. These characteristics include but are not limited to sample size, publication language, quality of study design and the number of participating centers. Because systematic review and meta-analysis is considered to be evidence of the highest quality in the era of evidence-based medicine, characteristics that may bias the results of meta-analysis should be fully investigated. Meta-epidemiological study aims to investigate the impact of study design characteristics on treatment effect. The article introduces how to perform meta-epidemiological study by using R software. There are several methodological approaches to perform meta-epidemiological study, depending on whether there is heterogeneity between meta-analyses and between trials. When there is no significant heterogeneity, these results would be similar.
© 2016 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords:  Logistic regression; R; meta-analysis; meta-epidemiology; randomized controlled trial

Year:  2016        PMID: 26924387     DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Med        ISSN: 1756-5391


  4 in total

Review 1.  Older studies can underestimate prognosis of glioblastoma biomarker in meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study for study-level effect in the current literature.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Kevin Phan; Julia X M Yin; Kerrie L McDonald
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The impact of malaria coinfection on Ebola virus disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah M Edwards; Helen Counihan; Craig Bonnington; Jane Achan; Prudence Hamade; James K Tibenderana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation.

Authors:  Ben Vandermeer; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Stephanie S Weinreich; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Dirk Bassler; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Askie; Haroon Saloojee; Paola Baiardi; Susan S Ellenberg; Johanna H van der Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Murad; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2017-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.