BACKGROUND: This study used cross-sectional data to test the independent relationship of proximity to chain fast-food outlets and proximity to full-service supermarkets on the frequency of mealtime dining at fast-food outlets in two major urban areas, using three approaches to define access. Interactions between presence of a supermarket and presence of fast-food outlets as predictors of fast-food dining were also tested. METHODS: Residential intersections for respondents in point-of-purchase and random-digit-dial telephone surveys of adults in Philadelphia, PA, and Baltimore, MD, were geocoded. The count of fast-food outlets and supermarkets within quarter-mile, half-mile, and 1-mile street network buffers around each respondent's intersection was calculated, as well as distance to the nearest fast-food outlet and supermarket. These variables were regressed on weekly fast-food dining frequency to determine whether proximity to fast food and supermarkets had independent and joint effects on fast-food dining. RESULTS: The effect of access to supermarkets and chain fast-food outlets varied by study population. Among telephone survey respondents, supermarket access was the only significant predictor of fast-food dining frequency. Point-of-purchase respondents were generally unaffected by proximity to either supermarkets or fast-food outlets. However, ≥1 fast-food outlet within a 1-mile buffer was an independent predictor of consuming more fast-food meals among point-of-purchase respondents. At the quarter-mile distance, ≥1 supermarket was predictive of fewer fast-food meals. CONCLUSIONS: Supermarket access was associated with less fast-food dining among telephone respondents, whereas access to fast-food outlets were associated with more fast-food visits among survey respondents identified at point-of-purchase. This study adds to the existing literature on geographic determinants of fast-food dining behavior among urban adults in the general population and those who regularly consume fast food.
BACKGROUND: This study used cross-sectional data to test the independent relationship of proximity to chain fast-food outlets and proximity to full-service supermarkets on the frequency of mealtime dining at fast-food outlets in two major urban areas, using three approaches to define access. Interactions between presence of a supermarket and presence of fast-food outlets as predictors of fast-food dining were also tested. METHODS: Residential intersections for respondents in point-of-purchase and random-digit-dial telephone surveys of adults in Philadelphia, PA, and Baltimore, MD, were geocoded. The count of fast-food outlets and supermarkets within quarter-mile, half-mile, and 1-mile street network buffers around each respondent's intersection was calculated, as well as distance to the nearest fast-food outlet and supermarket. These variables were regressed on weekly fast-food dining frequency to determine whether proximity to fast food and supermarkets had independent and joint effects on fast-food dining. RESULTS: The effect of access to supermarkets and chain fast-food outlets varied by study population. Among telephone survey respondents, supermarket access was the only significant predictor of fast-food dining frequency. Point-of-purchase respondents were generally unaffected by proximity to either supermarkets or fast-food outlets. However, ≥1 fast-food outlet within a 1-mile buffer was an independent predictor of consuming more fast-food meals among point-of-purchase respondents. At the quarter-mile distance, ≥1 supermarket was predictive of fewer fast-food meals. CONCLUSIONS: Supermarket access was associated with less fast-food dining among telephone respondents, whereas access to fast-food outlets were associated with more fast-food visits among survey respondents identified at point-of-purchase. This study adds to the existing literature on geographic determinants of fast-food dining behavior among urban adults in the general population and those who regularly consume fast food.
Authors: Mark A Pereira; Alex I Kartashov; Cara B Ebbeling; Linda Van Horn; Martha L Slattery; David R Jacobs; David S Ludwig Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 1-7 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cathleen D Zick; Ken R Smith; Jessie X Fan; Barbara B Brown; Ikuho Yamada; Lori Kowaleski-Jones Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Lauren Fiechtner; Jason Block; Dustin T Duncan; Matthew W Gillman; Steven L Gortmaker; Steven J Melly; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Prev Med Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Meizi He; Patricia Tucker; Jason Gilliland; Jennifer D Irwin; Kristian Larsen; Paul Hess Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jessica M Madrigal; Esteban Cedillo-Couvert; Ana C Ricardo; Lawrence J Appel; Cheryl A M Anderson; Rajat Deo; L Lee Hamm; Denise Cornish-Zirker; Thida C Tan; Daohang Sha; Jesse Y Hsu; Shannon N Zenk; Milda R Saunders; Victoria Persky; James P Lash Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Kee Chee Cheong; Cheong Yoon Ling; Lim Kuang Hock; Sumarni Mohd Ghazali; Teh Chien Huey; Mohd Khairuddin Che Ibrahim; Azli Baharudin; Cheong Siew Man; Cheah Yong Kang; Noor Ani Ahmad; Ahmad Faudzi Yusoff Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mariane de Almeida Alves; Maria Gabriela M Pinho; Elizabeth Nappi Corrêa; Janaina das Neves; Francisco de Assis Guedes de Vasconcelos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.390