Literature DB >> 26923664

Feature Biases in Early Word Learning: Network Distinctiveness Predicts Age of Acquisition.

Tomas Engelthaler1, Thomas T Hills1.   

Abstract

Do properties of a word's features influence the order of its acquisition in early word learning? Combining the principles of mutual exclusivity and shape bias, the present work takes a network analysis approach to understanding how feature distinctiveness predicts the order of early word learning. Distance networks were built from nouns with edge lengths computed using various distance measures. Feature distinctiveness was computed as a distance measure, showing how far an object in a network is from other objects based on shared and non-shared features. Feature distinctiveness predicted order of acquisition across all measures: Words that were further away from other words in the network space were learned earlier. The best distance measures were based only on non-shared features (object dissimilarity) and did not include shared features (object similarity). This indicates that shared features may play less of a role in early word learning than non-shared features. In addition, the strongest effects were found for visual form and surface features. Cluster analysis further revealed that this effect is a localized effect in the object feature space, where objects' distances from their cluster centroid were inversely correlated with their age of acquisition. Together, these results suggest a role for feature distinctiveness in early word learning.
© 2016 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distinctiveness; Mutual exclusivity; Network analysis; Shape bias; Word learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923664     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  9 in total

1.  Modeling early lexico-semantic network development: Perceptual features matter most.

Authors:  Ryan Peters; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04

2.  How humans learn and represent networks.

Authors:  Christopher W Lynn; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Individual differences in learning social and nonsocial network structures.

Authors:  Steven H Tompson; Ari E Kahn; Emily B Falk; Jean M Vettel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Local Patterns to Global Architectures: Influences of Network Topology on Human Learning.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Perceptual Connectivity Influences Toddlers' Attention to Known Objects and Subsequent Label Processing.

Authors:  Ryan E Peters; Justin B Kueser; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-27

7.  Optimizing the human learnability of abstract network representations.

Authors:  William Qian; Christopher W Lynn; Andrei A Klishin; Jennifer Stiso; Nicolas H Christianson; Dani S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Ari E Kahn; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Knowledge gaps in the early growth of semantic feature networks.

Authors:  Ann E Sizemore; Elisabeth A Karuza; Chad Giusti; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-09-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.