Austin C Starnes1, Carrie Huisingh1, Gerald McGwin2, Kenneth R Sloan3, Zsolt Ablonczy4, R Theodore Smith5, Christine A Curcio1, Thomas Ach1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology,University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham,Alabama. 2. Department of Epidemiology,University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham,Alabama. 3. Department of Computer and Information Sciences,University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham,Alabama. 4. Department of Ophthalmology,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,South Carolina. 5. Department of Ophthalmology,New York University School of Medicine,New York,New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is reportedly 3% bi-nucleated. The importance to human vision of multi-nucleated (MN)-RPE cells could be clarified with more data about their distribution in central retina. METHODS: Nineteen human RPE-flatmounts (9 ≤ 51 years, 10 > 80 years) were imaged at 12 locations: 3 eccentricities (fovea, perifovea, near periphery) in 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, temporal, nasal). Image stacks of lipofuscin-attributable autofluorescence and phalloidin labeled F-actin cytoskeleton were obtained using a confocal fluorescence microscope. Nuclei were devoid of autofluorescence and were marked using morphometric software. Cell areas were approximated by Voronoi regions. Mean number of nuclei per cell among eccentricity/quadrant groups and by age were compared using Poisson and binominal regression models. RESULTS: A total of 11,403 RPE cells at 200 locations were analyzed: 94.66% mono-, 5.31% bi-, 0.02% tri-nucleate, and 0.01% with 5 nuclei. Age had no effect on number of nuclei. There were significant regional differences: highest frequencies of MN-cells were found at the perifovea (9.9%) and near periphery (6.8%). The fovea lacked MN-cells almost entirely. The nasal quadrant had significantly more MN-cells compared to other quadrants, at all eccentricities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates MN-RPE cells in human macula. MN-cells may arise due to endoreplication, cell fusion, or incomplete cell division. The topography of MN-RPE cells follows the topography of photoreceptors; with near-absence at the fovea (cones only) and high frequency at perifovea (highest rod density). This distribution might reflect specific requirements of retinal metabolism or other mechanisms addressable in further studies.
BACKGROUND: The human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is reportedly 3% bi-nucleated. The importance to human vision of multi-nucleated (MN)-RPE cells could be clarified with more data about their distribution in central retina. METHODS: Nineteen human RPE-flatmounts (9 ≤ 51 years, 10 > 80 years) were imaged at 12 locations: 3 eccentricities (fovea, perifovea, near periphery) in 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, temporal, nasal). Image stacks of lipofuscin-attributable autofluorescence and phalloidin labeled F-actin cytoskeleton were obtained using a confocal fluorescence microscope. Nuclei were devoid of autofluorescence and were marked using morphometric software. Cell areas were approximated by Voronoi regions. Mean number of nuclei per cell among eccentricity/quadrant groups and by age were compared using Poisson and binominal regression models. RESULTS: A total of 11,403 RPE cells at 200 locations were analyzed: 94.66% mono-, 5.31% bi-, 0.02% tri-nucleate, and 0.01% with 5 nuclei. Age had no effect on number of nuclei. There were significant regional differences: highest frequencies of MN-cells were found at the perifovea (9.9%) and near periphery (6.8%). The fovea lacked MN-cells almost entirely. The nasal quadrant had significantly more MN-cells compared to other quadrants, at all eccentricities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates MN-RPE cells in human macula. MN-cells may arise due to endoreplication, cell fusion, or incomplete cell division. The topography of MN-RPE cells follows the topography of photoreceptors; with near-absence at the fovea (cones only) and high frequency at perifovea (highest rod density). This distribution might reflect specific requirements of retinal metabolism or other mechanisms addressable in further studies.
Authors: Guangpu Shi; Arvydas Maminishkis; Tina Banzon; Stephen Jalickee; Rong Li; Jeffrey Hammer; Sheldon S Miller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tobias Duncker; Jonathan P Greenberg; Janet R Sparrow; R Theodore Smith; Harry A Quigley; François C Delori Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jin-Dong Ding; Lincoln V Johnson; Rolf Herrmann; Sina Farsiu; Stephanie G Smith; Marybeth Groelle; Brian E Mace; Patrick Sullivan; Jeffrey A Jamison; Una Kelly; Ons Harrabi; Sangeetha Subbarao Bollini; Jeanette Dilley; Dione Kobayashi; Bing Kuang; Wenlin Li; Jaume Pons; John C Lin; Catherine Bowes Rickman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; Jeffrey D Messinger; Kenneth R Sloan; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lei Wang; Koray D Kaya; Sujung Kim; Matthew J Brooks; Jie Wang; Ying Xin; Jiang Qian; Anand Swaroop; James T Handa Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2020-07-04 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Aswin Pyakurel; Delphine Balmer; Marc K Saba-El-Leil; Caroline Kizilyaprak; Jean Daraspe; Bruno M Humbel; Laure Voisin; Yun Z Le; Johannes von Lintig; Sylvain Meloche; Raphaël Roduit Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: J Alan Gambril; Kenneth R Sloan; Thomas A Swain; Carrie Huisingh; Anna V Zarubina; Jeffrey D Messinger; Thomas Ach; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.799