PURPOSE: Recent development in anticancer therapies for breast carcinoma allowed an improvement in patients' survival, notwithstanding a parallel increase of cardiovascular morbidity. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer therapies represents a relevant problem due to its insidious onset and potentially irreversible cardiac damage. The aim of the present study was to test whether 2D speckle tracking analysis can help in predicting overt systolic dysfunction. METHODS: A "real world" cohort of 69 patients with breast carcinoma undergoing adjuvant and/or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was tested 2D-speckle tracking analysis before the beginning of chemotherapy and every 3 months for 1 year. Clinical data, 12-lead ECGs, and lab tests were collected according to the same visit protocol. RESULTS: Over 1-year follow-up, 19 patients (27 %) developed cardiac dysfunction according to the CREC criteria, with an average onset time from enrolment of 6.8 months. A global longitudinal strain (GLS) threshold ≥-16 % at 3 months from chemotherapy was able to predict subsequent systolic dysfunction development with high sensitivity (80 %) and specificity (90 %) and a negative predictive value of 92 %. After the introduction of cardioprotective drugs, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) progressively recovered, while alterations of GLS persisted at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Strain imaging with 2D speckle tracking allows the identification of patients at low-risk for chemotherapy-related systolic dysfunction and can help optimizing resources allocations and improving follow-up quality. GLS can also provide a more accurate prognostic index of resolved systolic dysfunction when compared to standard LVEF.
PURPOSE: Recent development in anticancer therapies for breast carcinoma allowed an improvement in patients' survival, notwithstanding a parallel increase of cardiovascular morbidity. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer therapies represents a relevant problem due to its insidious onset and potentially irreversible cardiac damage. The aim of the present study was to test whether 2D speckle tracking analysis can help in predicting overt systolic dysfunction. METHODS: A "real world" cohort of 69 patients with breast carcinoma undergoing adjuvant and/or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was tested 2D-speckle tracking analysis before the beginning of chemotherapy and every 3 months for 1 year. Clinical data, 12-lead ECGs, and lab tests were collected according to the same visit protocol. RESULTS: Over 1-year follow-up, 19 patients (27 %) developed cardiac dysfunction according to the CREC criteria, with an average onset time from enrolment of 6.8 months. A global longitudinal strain (GLS) threshold ≥-16 % at 3 months from chemotherapy was able to predict subsequent systolic dysfunction development with high sensitivity (80 %) and specificity (90 %) and a negative predictive value of 92 %. After the introduction of cardioprotective drugs, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) progressively recovered, while alterations of GLS persisted at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Strain imaging with 2D speckle tracking allows the identification of patients at low-risk for chemotherapy-related systolic dysfunction and can help optimizing resources allocations and improving follow-up quality. GLS can also provide a more accurate prognostic index of resolved systolic dysfunction when compared to standard LVEF.
Authors: Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Heloisa Sawaya; Igal A Sebag; Juan Carlos Plana; James L Januzzi; Bonnie Ky; Timothy C Tan; Victor Cohen; Jose Banchs; Joseph R Carver; Susan E Wiegers; Randolph P Martin; Michael H Picard; Robert E Gerszten; Elkan F Halpern; Jonathan Passeri; Irene Kuter; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Kazuaki Negishi; Tomoko Negishi; Brian A Haluska; James L Hare; Juan Carlos Plana; Thomas H Marwick Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: G Curigliano; D Cardinale; T Suter; G Plataniotis; E de Azambuja; M T Sandri; C Criscitiello; A Goldhirsch; C Cipolla; F Roila Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Joerg Herrmann; Amir Lerman; Nicole P Sandhu; Hector R Villarraga; Sharon L Mulvagh; Manish Kohli Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Médéa Locquet; Daan Spoor; Anne Crijns; Pim van der Harst; Arantxa Eraso; Ferran Guedea; Manuela Fiuza; Susana Constantino Rosa Santos; Stephanie Combs; Kai Borm; Elie Mousseaux; Umit Gencer; Guy Frija; Elisabeth Cardis; Hans Langendijk; Sophie Jacob Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Elissa A S Polomski; Julius C Heemelaar; Augustinus D G Krol; Marloes Louwerens; Saskia L M A Beeres; Eduard R Holman; J Wouter Jukema; Martin J Schalij; M Louisa Antoni Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-08 Impact factor: 6.575