Literature DB >> 26923375

Is non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with compensated hepatic cirrhosis possible by duplex Doppler ultrasonography?

Ritwik Chakrabarti1, Debraj Sen2, Vikram Khanna3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Esophageal varices are present in 30% to 40% of patients in compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A) and in 60% to 85% of patients in decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classes B and C). It is important to identify patients with compensated cirrhosis at risk for esophageal varix development. We evaluated the accuracy of a duplex Doppler ultrasonographic index for predicting the presence or absence of esophageal varices in patients with compensated hepatic cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A) by using endoscopy as the reference standard.
METHODS: Fifty-six enrolled patients underwent duplex Doppler ultrasonography followed by screening endoscopy. Mean portal vein velocity (PVV), splenic index (SI), splenoportal index (SPI), hepatic and splenic arterial resistive, and pulsatility indices (hepatic artery resistive index [HARI], hepatic artery pulsatility index [HAPI], splenic artery resistive index [SARI], splenic artery pulsatility index [SAPI]) were recorded. Univariate logistic regression analysis was followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve construction for the indices that were significant.
RESULTS: The indices HARI, HAPI, SARI, SAPI were not helpful (p > 0.05). Mean PVV, SI, and SPI were all predictive of the presence of esophageal varices (p < 0.05) and SPI was found to be the most accurate parameter. Of the various cut-off levels of SPI evaluated, a cut-off value of SPI at 5.0, offered the highest diagnostic accuracy (88%). For the 28 patients with SPI <5.0, the absence of esophageal varices in 27 of them could be correctly diagnosed using only SPI without invasive screening endoscopy, with high negative predictive value (96%) and sensitivity (96%). Of the remaining 28 patients with SPI ≥5.0, presence of esophageal varices could be similarly correctly diagnosed in 22 of them by using SPI without screening endoscopy, with high positive predictive value (79%) and specificity (82%).
CONCLUSION: The SPI was accurate in predicting the presence or absence of esophageal varices in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compensated cirrhosis; Duplex Doppler ultrasonography; Esophageal varices; Splenoportal index

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923375     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-016-0630-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current management of the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  G Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Value of splanchnic Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of portal hypertension.

Authors:  F Piscaglia; G Donati; C Serra; R Muratori; L Solmi; S Gaiani; L Gramantieri; L Bolondi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance, and primary prophylaxis strategies for esophageal varices.

Authors:  Miguel R Arguedas; Gustavo R Heudebert; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Gary A Abrams; Michael B Fallon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Color Doppler ultrasonography is reliable in assessing the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sanja Plestina; Roland Pulanić; Marko Kralik; Stjepko Plestina; Miro Samarzija
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ravi Madhotra; Hugh E Mulcahy; Ira Willner; Adrian Reuben
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Hepatic arterial pulsatility index in cirrhosis: correlation with portal pressure.

Authors:  A W Schneider; J F Kalk; C P Klein
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Hemodynamic analysis of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis using color Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Feng-Hua Li; Jing Hao; Jian-Guo Xia; Hong-Li Li; Hua Fang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Esophageal varices: noninvasive diagnosis with duplex Doppler US in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Chen-Hua Liu; Shih-Jer Hsu; Cheng-Chao Liang; Feng-Chiao Tsai; Jou-Wei Lin; Chun-Jen Liu; Pei-Ming Yang; Ming-Yang Lai; Pei-Jer Chen; Jun-Herng Chen; Jia-Horng Kao; Ding-Shinn Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  [Non-endoscopic predictors of large esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis].

Authors:  Myung Hee Chang; Joo Hyun Sohn; Tae Yeob Kim; Byoung Kwan Son; Jong Pyo Kim; Yong Cheol Jeon; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06

10.  Doppler study of mesenteric, hepatic, and portal circulation in alcoholic cirrhosis: relationship between quantitative Doppler measurements and the severity of portal hypertension and hepatic failure.

Authors:  P Taourel; P Blanc; M Dauzat; M Chabre; J Pradel; B Gallix; D Larrey; J M Bruel
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.425

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Portal vein flow velocity as a possible fast noninvasive screening tool for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Yara N Elkenawy; Reda A Elarabawy; Layla M Ahmed; Abdallah A Elsawy
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-01-22

2.  Feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Anderson Antônio de Faria; Carlos Alberto Freitas Dias; Luciana Dias Moetzsohn; Silas de Castro Carvalho; Tereza Abreu Ferrari; Vitor Nunes Arantes
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 3.  Platelet Count to Spleen Diameter Ratio for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Runhua Chen; Han Deng; Xia Ding; Chune Xie; Wei Wang; Qian Shen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Liver fibrosis index-based nomograms for identifying esophageal varices in patients with chronic hepatitis B related cirrhosis.

Authors:  Shi-Hao Xu; Fang Wu; Le-Hang Guo; Wei-Bing Zhang; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Νon-invasive screening for esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Andreas Karatzas; Christos Konstantakis; Ioanna Aggeletopoulou; Christina Kalogeropoulou; Konstantinos Thomopoulos; Christos Triantos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-03

6.  Gall bladder wall thickening as non-invasive screening parameter for esophageal varices - a comparative endoscopic - sonographic study.

Authors:  Birgit Tsaknakis; Rawan Masri; Ahmad Amanzada; Golo Petzold; Volker Ellenrieder; Albrecht Neesse; Steffen Kunsch
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.