| Literature DB >> 26923338 |
Chao-Ni He1, Wei-Qing Huang1, Liang Xu2,1, Yin-Cai Yang1, Bing-Xin Zhou1, Gui-Fang Huang1, P Peng2, Wu-Ming Liu3.
Abstract
The enhanced photocatalytic performance of doped graphene (Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26923338 PMCID: PMC4770300 DOI: 10.1038/srep22267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Crystal structures of GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites.
(a) Top view. The blue atom represents the location of dopant (B, N, S, and P). (b) Side view. (c) Top view of PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composite. One C atom bonded to P atom is removed to eliminate the large deformation of doped GR sheet. (d) Side view of crystal structure after optimization for SC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composite. The S dopant leads to a local distinct deformation of the GR sheet.
The distances from the Ag3PO4(100) surface to pure and doped GR sheets after optimization and the formation energy Ef (eV) for the GR/Ag3PO4(100) and doped GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites.
| Composites | Ef (eV) | Interface distance (Å) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| d1 | d2 | ||
| GR/Ag3PO4(100) | −0.77 | 2.61 | 2.65 |
| BC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | −5.12 | 2.63 | 2.68 |
| NC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | −5.48 | 3.12 | 3.15 |
| SC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 2.22 | 1.73 | 2.71 |
| PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | −7.34 | 2.63 | 2.68 |
d1 and d2 denote the farthest and closest distances from the Ag3PO4(100) surface to pure/doped GR sheets, respectively.
Figure 2Density of states (DOSs).
Left: The project DOSs for Ag3PO4(100) and pure/doped GR sheets. (a1–e1) are for GR/Ag3PO4(100), BC-, NC-, SC-, and PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The magenta and green curves are for pure/doped GR sheets and Ag3PO4(100) surface, respectively. It is clear that the near-gap electronic structures of the doped-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites are dependent on the dopants. Right: (b2–e2) DOSs of B, N, S, and P, respectively. The vertical dashed line indicates the Fermi level and the Fermi level is set at zero energy.
The band gap and Bader charge analysis for the undoped and doped GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites.
| Composites | Eg (eV) | Bader charge (e) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| B/N/S/P+VC-GR | Ag3PO4(100) | ||
| GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 0.53 | 0.39 | −0.39 |
| BC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 0.12 | 0.15 | −0.15 |
| NC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 1.44 | 0.61 | −0.61 |
| SC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 0.38 | 0.47 | −0.47 |
| PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) | 0.12 | 1.48 | −1.48 |
Figure 3The Mulliken population charges on the doped atoms and the atoms around the doped atom in GR sheet.
(a–e) are for undoped, BC-, NC-, SC-, and PC+VC-doped GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The red digits denote the significant variations of Mulliken population charges, relative to the corresponding positions in the GR/Ag3PO4(100) composite. It is clear that some C atoms become positively charged, while others are negative in these composites. Those atoms, especially the dopants, with positive effective charge will facilitate the adsorption of some species with negative charges, thus becoming active sites.
Figure 4The Mulliken population charges on Ag, O, and P atoms, which have changed in the Ag3PO4(100) surface.
(a–e) are for undoped, BC-, NC-, SC-, and PC+VC-doped GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The blue digits represent the changed Mulliken population charges on Ag atoms near the interface. The varistion of Mulliken population charges on P atoms shows that the dopants in GR sheets change the charge redistribution of the Ag3PO4(100) surface.
Figure 5Planar averaged self-consistent electrostatic potential as a function of position in the -direction: (a,d) are for BC- and NC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The higher potential near the doped GR sheets leads to a potential well formed at interfaces. 3D charge density difference with an isovalue of 0.006 e/Å3: (b,e) are for BC- and NC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. Blue and yellow is surfaces represent charge accumulation and depletion in the space. Planar averaged charge density difference as a function of position in the -direction: (c,f) are for BC- and NC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The charge difference shows that charge transfer occurs inversely from the Ag3PO4 surface to GR and induces the electrostatic potential inverse at the interface.
Figure 6Planar averaged self-consistent electrostatic potential as a function of position in the -direction: (a,d) are for SC- and PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The higher potential near the doped GR sheets leads to a potential well formed at interfaces. 3D charge density difference with an isovalue of 0.006 e/Å3: (b,e) are for SC- and PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. Blue and yellow is surfaces represent charge accumulation and depletion in the space. Planar averaged charge density difference as a function of position in the -direction: (c,f) are for SC- and PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, respectively. The charge difference shows that charge transfer occurs inversely from the Ag3PO4 surface to GR and induces the electrostatic potential inverse at the interface.
Figure 7Absorption spectra of the undoped, BC-, NC-, SC-, and PC+VC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites for the polarization vector perpendicular to the surface.
The inset of shows that the NC- and SC-GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites display strong absorption in the range 550 to 750 nm. The higher resonant-like peaks at about 400~440 nm, due to doping, are especially beneficial to enhance the photocatalytic performance of the doped GR/Ag3PO4(100) composites, according to the fact that the light with wavelength of ~440 nm might be the most appropriate visible light for generation of radical species in the GR/Ag3PO4(100) composite. The N atom may be one of the most appropriate dopants for the GR/Ag3PO4 photocatalyst.