Literature DB >> 26923334

Method for Fusing Observational Data and Chemical Transport Model Simulations To Estimate Spatiotemporally Resolved Ambient Air Pollution.

Mariel D Friberg1, Xinxin Zhai1, Heather A Holmes1, Howard H Chang2, Matthew J Strickland2, Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat2, Paige E Tolbert2, Armistead G Russell1, James A Mulholland1.   

Abstract

Investigations of ambient air pollution health effects rely on complete and accurate spatiotemporal air pollutant estimates. Three methods are developed for fusing ambient monitor measurements and 12 km resolution chemical transport model (CMAQ) simulations to estimate daily air pollutant concentrations across Georgia. Temporal variance is determined by observations in one method, with the annual mean CMAQ field providing spatial structure. A second method involves scaling daily CMAQ simulated fields using mean observations to reduce bias. Finally, a weighted average of these results based on prediction of temporal variance provides optimized daily estimates for each 12 × 12 km grid. These methods were applied to daily metrics of 12 pollutants (CO, NO2, NOx, O3, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and five PM2.5 components) over the state of Georgia for a seven-year period (2002-2008). Cross-validation demonstrates a wide range in optimized model performance across pollutants, with SO2 predicted most poorly due to limitations in coal combustion plume monitoring and modeling. For the other pollutants studied, 54-88% of the spatiotemporal variance (Pearson R(2) from cross-validation) was captured, with ozone and PM2.5 predicted best. The optimized fusion approach developed provides daily spatial field estimates of air pollutant concentrations and uncertainties that are consistent with observations, emissions, and meteorology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923334     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of a data fusion approach to estimate daily PM2.5 levels in North China.

Authors:  Fengchao Liang; Meng Gao; Qingyang Xiao; Gregory R Carmichael; Xiaochuan Pan; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach.

Authors:  Xuefei Hu; Jessica H Belle; Xia Meng; Avani Wildani; Lance A Waller; Matthew J Strickland; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Time-Series Analysis of Air Pollution and Health Accounting for Covariate-Dependent Overdispersion.

Authors:  Anqi Pan; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Examining Joint Effects of Air Pollution Exposure and Social Determinants of Health in Defining "At-Risk" Populations Under the Clean Air Act: Susceptibility of Pregnant Women to Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  World Med Health Policy       Date:  2018-03-12

5.  A System for Developing and Projecting PM2.5 Spatial Fields to Correspond to Just Meeting National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Carey J Jang; Brian Timin; Brett Gantt; Adam Reff; Yun Zhu; Shicheng Long; Adel Hanna
Journal:  Atmos Environ X       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  Associations Between Ambient Air Pollutant Concentrations and Birth Weight: A Quantile Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Strickland; Ying Lin; Lyndsey A Darrow; Joshua L Warren; James A Mulholland; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Fine particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: Comparison of assessment methods for long-term exposure.

Authors:  Laura A McGuinn; Cavin Ward-Caviness; Lucas M Neas; Alexandra Schneider; Qian Di; Alexandra Chudnovsky; Joel Schwartz; Petros Koutrakis; Armistead G Russell; Val Garcia; William E Kraus; Elizabeth R Hauser; Wayne Cascio; David Diaz-Sanchez; Robert B Devlin
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Health benefit assessment of PM2.5 reduction in Pearl River Delta region of China using a model-monitor data fusion approach.

Authors:  Jiabin Li; Yun Zhu; James T Kelly; Carey J Jang; Shuxiao Wang; Adel Hanna; Jia Xing; Che-Jen Lin; Shicheng Long; Lian Yu
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  A multicity study of air pollution and cardiorespiratory emergency department visits: Comparing approaches for combining estimates across cities.

Authors:  Jenna R Krall; Howard H Chang; Lance A Waller; James A Mulholland; Andrea Winquist; Evelyn O Talbott; Judith R Rager; Paige E Tolbert; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models.

Authors:  Minghui Diao; Tracey Holloway; Seohyun Choi; Susan M O'Neill; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene M Fiore; Daven K Henze; Forrest Lacey; Patrick L Kinney; Frank Freedman; Narasimhan K Larkin; Yufei Zou; James T Kelly; Ambarish Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.235

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.