| Literature DB >> 26922682 |
Mehran Rostami, Abdollah Jalilian1, Ramin Rezaei-Zangeneh, Arash Salari.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of factors in the choice of suicide methods is important in understanding the phenomenon.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26922682 PMCID: PMC6074267 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Saudi Med ISSN: 0256-4947 Impact factor: 1.526
Figure 1Population pyramid of Kermanshah province according to the 2011 Census of Population and Housing.
Distribution (number and percentage) of completed suicide cases in Kermanshah province by suicide method and demographic factors.
| Hanging (n=793) | Self-immolation (n=493) | Drug-poisoning (n=237) | Firearms (n=210) | Toxic-poisoning (n=123) | Others (n=45) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Male | 605 (76.3) | 87 (17.6) | 156 (65.8) | 177 (84.3) | 77 (62.6) | 36 (80.0) |
| Female | 188 (23.7) | 406 (82.4) | 81 (34.2) | 33 (15.7) | 46 (37.4) | 9 (20.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Rural | 131 (16.5) | 72 (14.6) | 11 (4.6) | 52 (24.8) | 13 (10.6) | 8 (17.8) |
| Urban | 662 (83.5) | 421 (85.4) | 226 (95.4) | 158 (75.2) | 110 (89.4) | 37 (82.2) |
|
| ||||||
| 10–19 | 98 (12.4) | 90 (18.3) | 36 (15.2) | 34 (16.3) | 14 (11.6) | 2 (4.4) |
| 20–29 | 271 (34.4) | 226 (45.9) | 133 (56.4) | 103 (49.3) | 47 (38.8) | 10 (22.2) |
| 30–39 | 189 (23.9) | 91 (18.5) | 38 (16.1) | 30 (14.3) | 20 (16.5) | 17 (37.8) |
| ≥40 | 231 (29.3) | 85 (17.3) | 29 (12.3) | 42 (20.1) | 40 (33.1) | 16 (35.6) |
|
| ||||||
| Illiterate | 163 (20.7) | 133 (27.1) | 21 (8.9) | 24 (11.5) | 33 (27.3) | 3 (6.7) |
| Primary/Middle school | 379 (48.2) | 248 (50.5) | 132 (55.9) | 95 (45.4) | 53 (43.8) | 21 (46.7) |
| High school/Diploma | 220 (28.0) | 98 (20.0) | 68 (28.8) | 79 (37.8) | 30 (24.8) | 15 (33.3) |
| University degree | 24 (3.1) | 12 (2.4) | 15 (6.4) | 11 (5.3) | 5 (4.1) | 6 (13.3) |
|
| ||||||
| Never married | 384 (48.6) | 196 (39.9) | 144 (61.0) | 128 (61.2) | 53 (43.8) | 23 (51.1) |
| Married | 350 (44.3) | 276 (56.2) | 83 (35.2) | 71 (34.0) | 54 (44.6) | 18 (40.0) |
|
| ||||||
| 56 (7.1) | 19 (3.9) | 9 (3.8) | 10 (4.8) | 14 (11.6) | 4 (8.9) | |
The others category of marital status includes cases with widowed, divorced or separated and unspecified marital status.
Figure 2Proportions of suicide methods between males and females.
Figure 3Proportions of suicide methods among different age groups.
Figure 4Statistics and P values of the likelihood-ratio chi-square tests of independence for association of each factor with the choice of suicide method.
Estimated relative-risk ratios (RRR), 95% confidence intervals and P values versus the null hypothesis based on the fitted multinomial logistic regression model.
| Factors | Levels | RRR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Female | 1.83 | 1.20 | 2.81 | ||
| Living area | Rural | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Urban | 1.79 | 0.97 | 3.30 | .063 | |
| Age group | 10–19 | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| 20–29 | 1.22 | 0.63 | 2.36 | .558 | |
| 30–39 | 0.73 | 0.33 | 1.62 | .445 | |
| ≥ 40 | 1.01 | 0.44 | 2.29 | .986 | |
| Education level | Illiterate | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Primary/Middle school | 0.78 | 0.45 | 1.36 | .384 | |
| High school/Diploma | 0.74 | 0.39 | 1.41 | .363 | |
| University degree | 1.15 | 0.38 | 3.42 | .804 | |
| Marital status | Never married | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Married | 1.11 | 0.68 | 1.82 | .670 | |
| Others | 1.57 | 0.75 | 3.31 | .232 | |
| Gender | Male | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Female | 1.74 | 1.24 | 2.45 | ||
| Living area | Rural | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Urban | 3.98 | 2.10 | 7.56 | ||
| Age group | 10–19 | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| 20–29 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 2.13 | .193 | |
| 30–39 | 0.60 | 0.34 | 1.07 | .083 | |
| ≥ 40 | 0.46 | 0.11 | 1.14 | ||
| Education level | Illiterate | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Primary/Middle school | 1.70 | 0.97 | 2.96 | .062 | |
| High school/Diploma | 1.33 | 0.73 | 2.42 | .352 | |
| University degree | 2.76 | 1.19 | 6.42 | ||
| Marital status | Never married | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Married | 0.97 | 0.67 | 1.41 | .877 | |
| Others | 0.71 | 0.32 | 1.56 | .395 | |
| Gender | Male | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Female | 13.32 | 9.86 | 17.99 | .001 | |
| Living area | Rural | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Urban | 1.58 | 1.09 | 2.29 | ||
| Age group | 10–19 | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| 20–29 | 1.01 | 0.68 | 1.51 | .952 | |
| 30–39 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.97 | ||
| ≥ 40 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.61 | ||
| Education level | Illiterate | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Primary/Middle school | 0.69 | 0.47 | 1.02 | .062 | |
| High school/Diploma | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.69 | <.001 | |
| University degree | 0.62 | 0.26 | 1.44 | .262 | |
| Marital status | Never married | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Married | 1.55 | 1.13 | 2.14 | ||
| Others | 0.59 | 0.36 | 1.03 | .054 | |
| Gender | Male | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Female | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.86 | ||
| Living area | Rural | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Urban | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.82 | ||
| Age group | 10–19 | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| 20–29 | 1.09 | 0.68 | 1.74 | .732 | |
| 30–39 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.85 | ||
| ≥ 40 | 0.62 | 0.33 | 1.19 | .155 | |
| Education level | Illiterate | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Primary/Middle school | 1.35 | 0.78 | 2.34 | .283 | |
| High school/Diploma | 1.79 | 1.00 | 3.19 | ||
| University degree | 2.32 | 0.95 | 5.65 | .065 | |
| Marital status | Never married | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Married | 0.97 | 0.64 | 1.45 | .873 | |
| Others | 1.00 | 0.47 | 2.14 | .994 | |
| Gender | Male | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Female | 1.24 | 0.56 | 2.73 | .592 | |
| Living area | Rural | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Urban | 0.77 | 0.34 | 1.72 | .524 | |
| Age group | 10–19 | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| 20–29 | 1.92 | 0.41 | 9.10 | .410 | |
| 30–39 | 6.36 | 1.36 | 29.74 | ||
| ≥40 | 9.50 | 1.87 | 48.28 | ||
| Education level | Illiterate | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Primary/Middle school | 5.26 | 1.44 | 19.30 | ||
| High school/Diploma | 7.69 | 1.99 | 29.72 | ||
| University degree | 24.91 | 5.27 | 117.70 | ||
| Marital status | Never married | 1.0 (reference) | |||
| Married | 0.52 | 0.24 | 1.01 | .082 | |
| Others | 1.07 | 0.32 | 3.55 | .910 | |
Null hypothesis is RRR=1.0. Hanging is the baseline (reference) method. Statistically significant results (P<.05) are bolded. Detailed model parameters available online at:
The overall relative-risk ratios (RRR), their 95% confidence intervals and the P values of the null hypothesis of of the demographic factors associated with the choice of suicide methods based on the fitted multinomial logistic regression model.
| Self-immolation | Drug poisoning | Firearms | Toxic poisoning | Others | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRR | 13.55 | 1.67 | 0.57 | 1.89 | 1.15 | ||||||
| <.001 | .003 | .009 | .003 | .730 | |||||||
| 95% CI | 10.07 | 18.23 | 1.20 | 2.34 | 0.37 | 0.87 | 1.24 | 2.88 | 0.53 | 2.50 | |
| RRR | 1.57 | 4.07 | 0.56 | 1.8 | 0.80 | ||||||
| .015 | <.001 | .003 | .061 | .583 | |||||||
| 95% CI | 1.09 | 2.26 | 2.15 | 7.71 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 3.31 | 0.36 | 1.78 | |
| RRR | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 1.99 | ||||||
| <.001 | <.001 | .008 | .695 | .001 | |||||||
| 95% CI | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 1.21 | 1.34 | 2.95 | |
| RRR | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 1.22 | 0.74 | ||||||
| .912 | .380 | .774 | .282 | .353 | |||||||
| 95% CI | 0.79 | 1.3 | 0.64 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 1.31 | 0.85 | 1.77 | 0.39 | 1.40 | |
| RRR | 0.85 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 0.95 | 1.55 | ||||||
| .002 | .282 | .017 | .488 | <.001 | |||||||
| 95% CI | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 1.03 | 1.30 | 0.82 | 1.10 | 1.25 | 1.93 | |
Null hypothesis is RRR=1.0. Hanging is the baseline (reference) method. Statistically significant results (P<.05) are bolded.