Literature DB >> 26922676

Influence of lumbar spine rhythms and intra-abdominal pressure on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination.

Rizwan Arshad1, Thomas Zander1, Marcel Dreischarf1, Hendrik Schmidt2.   

Abstract

Improved knowledge on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces may clarify the mechanical causes of various spinal diseases and has the potential to improve the current treatment options. Using an inverse dynamic musculoskeletal model, this sensitivity analysis was aimed to investigate the influence of lumbar spine rhythms and intra-abdominal pressure on the compressive and shear forces in L4-L5 disc and the trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination. Based on in vivo data, three different spine rhythms (SRs) were used along with alternative settings (with/without) of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Compressive and shear forces in L4-L5 disc as well as trunk muscle forces were predicted by inverse static simulations from standing upright to 55° of intermediate trunk inclination. Alternate model settings of intra-abdominal pressure and different spine rhythms resulted in significant variation of compression (763 N) and shear forces (195 N) in the L4-L5 disc and in global (454 N) and local (156 N) trunk muscle forces at maximum flexed position. During upper body inclination, the compression forces at L4-L5 disc were mostly released by IAP and increased for larger intervertebral rotation in a lumbar spine rhythm. This study demonstrated that with various possible assumptions of lumbar spine rhythm and intra-abdominal pressure, variation in predicted loads and muscles forces increase with larger flexion. It is therefore, essential to adapt these model parameters for accurate prediction of spinal loads and trunk muscle forces.
Copyright © 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anybody; Intra-abdominal pressure; Inverse quasi-static; MiSpEx; Spinal loads; Spine rhythm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922676     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  Effects of body postures on the shear modulus of thoracolumbar fascia: a shear wave elastography study.

Authors:  Baizhen Chen; Chunlong Liu; Ming Lin; Weixin Deng; Zhijie Zhang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effect of muscle ageing and sarcopenia on spinal segmental loads.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Waldo Valenzuela; Mauricio Reyes; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intervertebral Disc Swelling Demonstrated by 3D and Water Content Magnetic Resonance Analyses after a 3-Day Dry Immersion Simulating Microgravity.

Authors:  Loïc Treffel; Karen Mkhitaryan; Stéphane Gellee; Guillemette Gauquelin-Koch; Claude Gharib; Stéphane Blanc; Catherine Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Dependence of lumbar loads on spinopelvic sagittal alignment: An evaluation based on musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Tito Bassani; Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Numerical Investigation of Intra-abdominal Pressure Effects on Spinal Loads and Load-Sharing in Forward Flexion.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Kinda Khalaf; Samer Adeeb; Marwan El-Rich
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Prediction of the Spinal Musculoskeletal Loadings during Level Walking and Stair Climbing after Two Types of Simulated Interventions in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Shengzheng Kuai; Xinyu Guan; Weiqiang Liu; Run Ji; Jianyi Xiong; Daping Wang; Wenyu Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  The Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Spine Loading Characteristics during Trunk Flexion and Two Types of Picking Up Activities.

Authors:  Shengzheng Kuai; Weiqiang Liu; Run Ji; Wenyu Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 2.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.